Clinical Efficacy of Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Psychiatric and Cognitive Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review

BackgroundTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a widely used noninvasive brain stimulation technique for psychiatric and cognitive disorders. In recent years, deep TMS (dTMS) has shown promise as an enhanced form of TMS able to stimulate deeper brain structures and targ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne-Marie Di Passa, Melissa Dabir, Allan Fein, Saba Khoshroo, Carly McIntyre-Wood, Emma Marsden, Emily MacKillop, Jane De Jesus, James MacKillop, Dante Duarte
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2023-05-01
Series:JMIR Research Protocols
Online Access:https://www.researchprotocols.org/2023/1/e45213
_version_ 1827857296929062912
author Anne-Marie Di Passa
Melissa Dabir
Allan Fein
Saba Khoshroo
Carly McIntyre-Wood
Emma Marsden
Emily MacKillop
Jane De Jesus
James MacKillop
Dante Duarte
author_facet Anne-Marie Di Passa
Melissa Dabir
Allan Fein
Saba Khoshroo
Carly McIntyre-Wood
Emma Marsden
Emily MacKillop
Jane De Jesus
James MacKillop
Dante Duarte
author_sort Anne-Marie Di Passa
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a widely used noninvasive brain stimulation technique for psychiatric and cognitive disorders. In recent years, deep TMS (dTMS) has shown promise as an enhanced form of TMS able to stimulate deeper brain structures and target broader networks. Various magnetic Hesed-coil (H-coil) designs—a novel feature of dTMS—have been used to stimulate brain regions implicated in the pathophysiology of specific psychiatric and cognitive disorders, thereby producing therapeutic effects. Given the novelty of dTMS in psychiatry, little is known about the clinical efficacy of dTMS across psychiatric and cognitive disorders—that is, whether dTMS performs superiorly to sham or control. ObjectiveIn this paper, we outline a protocol for a systematic review investigating the clinical efficacy of dTMS. The primary objective is to conduct a systematic review of the literature on dTMS for psychiatric and cognitive disorders and, if feasible, a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of active dTMS versus sham/control for psychiatric disorders. Dementia and related cognitive disorders will also be examined. A secondary objective will be to examine subgroup differences (by age, sex, H-coil design, and dTMS parameters [ie, pulses per session, percentage of motor threshold, etc]) to evaluate whether dTMS differentially influences clinical outcomes based on these factors. MethodsA comprehensive search of the APA PsycINFO, Embase, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases will be conducted using keywords such as “H-coil” and “dTMS.” Two authors (AD and MD) will be responsible for screening relevant articles, assessing article eligibility (according to predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria), and data extraction. All included articles will undergo a quality and risk of bias assessment. Data from included articles will be summarized qualitatively in a systematic review. If a sufficient number of equivalent studies are available, a meta-analysis will be performed to (1) determine the effect of active versus sham dTMS (or another control arm) across psychiatric and cognitive disorders, and (2) examine subgroup effects of clinical outcomes. ResultsThe preliminary search rendered a total of 1134 articles from the APA PsycINFO, Embase, and MEDLINE databases. After full-text screening, 21 eligible articles remained. One additional article was identified from the references section of an existing systematic review. In total, 22 eligible articles were included. Data extraction and quality of assessment procedures are ongoing. ConclusionsWe will outline the evidence relating to the clinical efficacy of dTMS in various psychiatric and cognitive disorders. The results of the prospective systematic review will provide clinicians with valuable insight into the clinical (ie, participant age, sex, psychiatric or cognitive disorder, etc) and methodological factors (ie, H-coil design, dTMS parameters, etc) which may contribute to dTMS efficacy, and thereby may assist clinicians in their decision to prescribe dTMS for specific psychiatric and cognitive disorders. Trial RegistrationPROSPERO CRD42022360066; https://tinyurl.com/5ev6byrn International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)DERR1-10.2196/45213
first_indexed 2024-03-12T12:39:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-811ada07a7134fe9a85a492727296ffc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1929-0748
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T12:39:27Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series JMIR Research Protocols
spelling doaj.art-811ada07a7134fe9a85a492727296ffc2023-08-28T23:58:34ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Research Protocols1929-07482023-05-0112e4521310.2196/45213Clinical Efficacy of Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Psychiatric and Cognitive Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic ReviewAnne-Marie Di Passahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8310-8716Melissa Dabirhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7575-7567Allan Feinhttps://orcid.org/0009-0009-6466-6921Saba Khoshroohttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9470-8146Carly McIntyre-Woodhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4838-0300Emma Marsdenhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5993-7314Emily MacKillophttps://orcid.org/0009-0001-2518-2969Jane De Jesushttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3334-6799James MacKillophttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8695-1071Dante Duartehttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7516-5473 BackgroundTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a widely used noninvasive brain stimulation technique for psychiatric and cognitive disorders. In recent years, deep TMS (dTMS) has shown promise as an enhanced form of TMS able to stimulate deeper brain structures and target broader networks. Various magnetic Hesed-coil (H-coil) designs—a novel feature of dTMS—have been used to stimulate brain regions implicated in the pathophysiology of specific psychiatric and cognitive disorders, thereby producing therapeutic effects. Given the novelty of dTMS in psychiatry, little is known about the clinical efficacy of dTMS across psychiatric and cognitive disorders—that is, whether dTMS performs superiorly to sham or control. ObjectiveIn this paper, we outline a protocol for a systematic review investigating the clinical efficacy of dTMS. The primary objective is to conduct a systematic review of the literature on dTMS for psychiatric and cognitive disorders and, if feasible, a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of active dTMS versus sham/control for psychiatric disorders. Dementia and related cognitive disorders will also be examined. A secondary objective will be to examine subgroup differences (by age, sex, H-coil design, and dTMS parameters [ie, pulses per session, percentage of motor threshold, etc]) to evaluate whether dTMS differentially influences clinical outcomes based on these factors. MethodsA comprehensive search of the APA PsycINFO, Embase, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases will be conducted using keywords such as “H-coil” and “dTMS.” Two authors (AD and MD) will be responsible for screening relevant articles, assessing article eligibility (according to predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria), and data extraction. All included articles will undergo a quality and risk of bias assessment. Data from included articles will be summarized qualitatively in a systematic review. If a sufficient number of equivalent studies are available, a meta-analysis will be performed to (1) determine the effect of active versus sham dTMS (or another control arm) across psychiatric and cognitive disorders, and (2) examine subgroup effects of clinical outcomes. ResultsThe preliminary search rendered a total of 1134 articles from the APA PsycINFO, Embase, and MEDLINE databases. After full-text screening, 21 eligible articles remained. One additional article was identified from the references section of an existing systematic review. In total, 22 eligible articles were included. Data extraction and quality of assessment procedures are ongoing. ConclusionsWe will outline the evidence relating to the clinical efficacy of dTMS in various psychiatric and cognitive disorders. The results of the prospective systematic review will provide clinicians with valuable insight into the clinical (ie, participant age, sex, psychiatric or cognitive disorder, etc) and methodological factors (ie, H-coil design, dTMS parameters, etc) which may contribute to dTMS efficacy, and thereby may assist clinicians in their decision to prescribe dTMS for specific psychiatric and cognitive disorders. Trial RegistrationPROSPERO CRD42022360066; https://tinyurl.com/5ev6byrn International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)DERR1-10.2196/45213https://www.researchprotocols.org/2023/1/e45213
spellingShingle Anne-Marie Di Passa
Melissa Dabir
Allan Fein
Saba Khoshroo
Carly McIntyre-Wood
Emma Marsden
Emily MacKillop
Jane De Jesus
James MacKillop
Dante Duarte
Clinical Efficacy of Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Psychiatric and Cognitive Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review
JMIR Research Protocols
title Clinical Efficacy of Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Psychiatric and Cognitive Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review
title_full Clinical Efficacy of Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Psychiatric and Cognitive Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review
title_fullStr Clinical Efficacy of Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Psychiatric and Cognitive Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Efficacy of Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Psychiatric and Cognitive Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review
title_short Clinical Efficacy of Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Psychiatric and Cognitive Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review
title_sort clinical efficacy of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation in psychiatric and cognitive disorders protocol for a systematic review
url https://www.researchprotocols.org/2023/1/e45213
work_keys_str_mv AT annemariedipassa clinicalefficacyofdeeptranscranialmagneticstimulationinpsychiatricandcognitivedisordersprotocolforasystematicreview
AT melissadabir clinicalefficacyofdeeptranscranialmagneticstimulationinpsychiatricandcognitivedisordersprotocolforasystematicreview
AT allanfein clinicalefficacyofdeeptranscranialmagneticstimulationinpsychiatricandcognitivedisordersprotocolforasystematicreview
AT sabakhoshroo clinicalefficacyofdeeptranscranialmagneticstimulationinpsychiatricandcognitivedisordersprotocolforasystematicreview
AT carlymcintyrewood clinicalefficacyofdeeptranscranialmagneticstimulationinpsychiatricandcognitivedisordersprotocolforasystematicreview
AT emmamarsden clinicalefficacyofdeeptranscranialmagneticstimulationinpsychiatricandcognitivedisordersprotocolforasystematicreview
AT emilymackillop clinicalefficacyofdeeptranscranialmagneticstimulationinpsychiatricandcognitivedisordersprotocolforasystematicreview
AT janedejesus clinicalefficacyofdeeptranscranialmagneticstimulationinpsychiatricandcognitivedisordersprotocolforasystematicreview
AT jamesmackillop clinicalefficacyofdeeptranscranialmagneticstimulationinpsychiatricandcognitivedisordersprotocolforasystematicreview
AT danteduarte clinicalefficacyofdeeptranscranialmagneticstimulationinpsychiatricandcognitivedisordersprotocolforasystematicreview