What the climate movement’s debate about disruption gets wrong
The recent debate about whether climate activists should employ disruptive tactics tends to conflate all forms of disruption. The debate typically focuses on the public’s reaction to protesters, yet the more important question is whether a given tactic imposes disruption on elite decision makers. Mo...
Main Authors: | Kevin A. Young, Laura Thomas-Walters |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer Nature
2024-01-01
|
Series: | Humanities & Social Sciences Communications |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02507-y |
Similar Items
-
What is Wrong with Getting Emotional? On the Adjective ‘EMOTIONAL’ in British English
by: Jelena Rakić
Published: (2016-06-01) -
Lightning protection: getting it wrong
by: Gomes, Chandima, et al.
Published: (2011) -
Getting on the Wrong Side of Constitutionalism
by: Rodrigo Kaufmann -
What's wrong with me? : the frustrated patient's guide to getting an accurate diagnosis /
by: 296384 Dannheisser, Lynn M., et al.
Published: (2005) - Why the Debate between Kumm and Armstrong is about the Wrong Question