Ground Reaction Forces and Kinematics of Ski Jump Landing Using Wearable Sensors

In the past, technological issues limited research focused on ski jump landing. Today, thanks to the development of wearable sensors, it is possible to analyze the biomechanics of athletes without interfering with their movements. The aims of this study were twofold. Firstly, the quantification of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Veronica Bessone, Johannes Petrat, Ansgar Schwirtz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-04-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/19/9/2011
_version_ 1798027064331206656
author Veronica Bessone
Johannes Petrat
Ansgar Schwirtz
author_facet Veronica Bessone
Johannes Petrat
Ansgar Schwirtz
author_sort Veronica Bessone
collection DOAJ
description In the past, technological issues limited research focused on ski jump landing. Today, thanks to the development of wearable sensors, it is possible to analyze the biomechanics of athletes without interfering with their movements. The aims of this study were twofold. Firstly, the quantification of the kinetic magnitude during landing is performed using wireless force insoles while 22 athletes jumped during summer training on the hill. In the second part, the insoles were combined with inertial motion units (IMUs) to determine the possible correlation between kinematics and kinetics during landing. The maximal normal ground reaction force (GRF<sub>max</sub>) ranged between 1.1 and 5.3 body weight per foot independently when landing using the telemark or parallel leg technique. The GRF<sub>max</sub> and impulse were correlated with flying time (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The hip flexions/extensions and the knee and hip rotations of the telemark front leg correlated with GRF<sub>max</sub> (<i>r</i> = 0.689, <i>p</i> = 0.040; <i>r</i> = &#8722;0.670, <i>p</i> = 0.048; <i>r</i> = 0.820, <i>p</i> = 0.007; respectively). The force insoles and their combination with IMUs resulted in promising setups to analyze landing biomechanics and to provide in-field feedback to the athletes, being quick to place and light, without limiting movement.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T18:45:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8128be3e92cb4ec0807a7bac9a755f37
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T18:45:18Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-8128be3e92cb4ec0807a7bac9a755f372022-12-22T04:08:49ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202019-04-01199201110.3390/s19092011s19092011Ground Reaction Forces and Kinematics of Ski Jump Landing Using Wearable SensorsVeronica Bessone0Johannes Petrat1Ansgar Schwirtz2Department of Biomechanics in Sports, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 80992 Munich, GermanyDepartment of Biomechanics in Sports, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 80992 Munich, GermanyDepartment of Biomechanics in Sports, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 80992 Munich, GermanyIn the past, technological issues limited research focused on ski jump landing. Today, thanks to the development of wearable sensors, it is possible to analyze the biomechanics of athletes without interfering with their movements. The aims of this study were twofold. Firstly, the quantification of the kinetic magnitude during landing is performed using wireless force insoles while 22 athletes jumped during summer training on the hill. In the second part, the insoles were combined with inertial motion units (IMUs) to determine the possible correlation between kinematics and kinetics during landing. The maximal normal ground reaction force (GRF<sub>max</sub>) ranged between 1.1 and 5.3 body weight per foot independently when landing using the telemark or parallel leg technique. The GRF<sub>max</sub> and impulse were correlated with flying time (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The hip flexions/extensions and the knee and hip rotations of the telemark front leg correlated with GRF<sub>max</sub> (<i>r</i> = 0.689, <i>p</i> = 0.040; <i>r</i> = &#8722;0.670, <i>p</i> = 0.048; <i>r</i> = 0.820, <i>p</i> = 0.007; respectively). The force insoles and their combination with IMUs resulted in promising setups to analyze landing biomechanics and to provide in-field feedback to the athletes, being quick to place and light, without limiting movement.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/19/9/2011landinginjury preventionkinematicskineticsperformancewinter sportforce insolesinertial sensorsimpact
spellingShingle Veronica Bessone
Johannes Petrat
Ansgar Schwirtz
Ground Reaction Forces and Kinematics of Ski Jump Landing Using Wearable Sensors
Sensors
landing
injury prevention
kinematics
kinetics
performance
winter sport
force insoles
inertial sensors
impact
title Ground Reaction Forces and Kinematics of Ski Jump Landing Using Wearable Sensors
title_full Ground Reaction Forces and Kinematics of Ski Jump Landing Using Wearable Sensors
title_fullStr Ground Reaction Forces and Kinematics of Ski Jump Landing Using Wearable Sensors
title_full_unstemmed Ground Reaction Forces and Kinematics of Ski Jump Landing Using Wearable Sensors
title_short Ground Reaction Forces and Kinematics of Ski Jump Landing Using Wearable Sensors
title_sort ground reaction forces and kinematics of ski jump landing using wearable sensors
topic landing
injury prevention
kinematics
kinetics
performance
winter sport
force insoles
inertial sensors
impact
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/19/9/2011
work_keys_str_mv AT veronicabessone groundreactionforcesandkinematicsofskijumplandingusingwearablesensors
AT johannespetrat groundreactionforcesandkinematicsofskijumplandingusingwearablesensors
AT ansgarschwirtz groundreactionforcesandkinematicsofskijumplandingusingwearablesensors