Future-Proofed Energy Design Approaches for Achieving Low-Energy Homes: Enhancing the Code for Sustainable Homes

Under the label “future-proofing”, this paper examines the temporal component of sustainable construction as an unexplored, yet fundamental ingredient in the delivery of low-energy domestic buildings. The overarching aim is to explore the integration of future-proofed design approaches into current...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Maria Christina Georgiadou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2014-09-01
Series:Buildings
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/4/3/488
_version_ 1811194356660436992
author Maria Christina Georgiadou
author_facet Maria Christina Georgiadou
author_sort Maria Christina Georgiadou
collection DOAJ
description Under the label “future-proofing”, this paper examines the temporal component of sustainable construction as an unexplored, yet fundamental ingredient in the delivery of low-energy domestic buildings. The overarching aim is to explore the integration of future-proofed design approaches into current mainstream construction practice in the UK, focusing on the example of the Code for Sustainable Homes (CSH) tool. Regulation has been the most significant driver for achieving the 2016 zero-carbon target; however, there is a gap between the appeal for future-proofing and the lack of effective implementation by building professionals. Even though the CSH was introduced as the leading tool to drive the “step-change” required for achieving zero-carbon new homes by 2016 and the single national standard to encourage energy performance beyond current statutory minima, it lacks assessment criteria that explicitly promote a futures perspective. Based on an established conceptual model of future-proofing, 14 interviews with building practitioners in the UK were conducted to identify the “feasible” and “reasonably feasible” future-proofed design approaches with the potential to enhance the “Energy and CO2 Emissions” category of the CSH. The findings are categorised under three key aspects; namely: coverage of sustainability issues; adopting lifecycle thinking; and accommodating risks and uncertainties and seek to inform industry practice and policy-making in relation to building energy performance.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T00:25:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8129d6a754f94f1aab2117497adbf0e9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-5309
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T00:25:49Z
publishDate 2014-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Buildings
spelling doaj.art-8129d6a754f94f1aab2117497adbf0e92022-12-22T03:55:33ZengMDPI AGBuildings2075-53092014-09-014348851910.3390/buildings4030488buildings4030488Future-Proofed Energy Design Approaches for Achieving Low-Energy Homes: Enhancing the Code for Sustainable HomesMaria Christina Georgiadou0Department of Property and Construction, School of Architecture and the Built Environment, University of Westminster, 35 Marylebone Road, London NW1 5LS, UKUnder the label “future-proofing”, this paper examines the temporal component of sustainable construction as an unexplored, yet fundamental ingredient in the delivery of low-energy domestic buildings. The overarching aim is to explore the integration of future-proofed design approaches into current mainstream construction practice in the UK, focusing on the example of the Code for Sustainable Homes (CSH) tool. Regulation has been the most significant driver for achieving the 2016 zero-carbon target; however, there is a gap between the appeal for future-proofing and the lack of effective implementation by building professionals. Even though the CSH was introduced as the leading tool to drive the “step-change” required for achieving zero-carbon new homes by 2016 and the single national standard to encourage energy performance beyond current statutory minima, it lacks assessment criteria that explicitly promote a futures perspective. Based on an established conceptual model of future-proofing, 14 interviews with building practitioners in the UK were conducted to identify the “feasible” and “reasonably feasible” future-proofed design approaches with the potential to enhance the “Energy and CO2 Emissions” category of the CSH. The findings are categorised under three key aspects; namely: coverage of sustainability issues; adopting lifecycle thinking; and accommodating risks and uncertainties and seek to inform industry practice and policy-making in relation to building energy performance.http://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/4/3/488code for sustainable homesenergy designfuture-proofingpolicy and practicezero-carbon
spellingShingle Maria Christina Georgiadou
Future-Proofed Energy Design Approaches for Achieving Low-Energy Homes: Enhancing the Code for Sustainable Homes
Buildings
code for sustainable homes
energy design
future-proofing
policy and practice
zero-carbon
title Future-Proofed Energy Design Approaches for Achieving Low-Energy Homes: Enhancing the Code for Sustainable Homes
title_full Future-Proofed Energy Design Approaches for Achieving Low-Energy Homes: Enhancing the Code for Sustainable Homes
title_fullStr Future-Proofed Energy Design Approaches for Achieving Low-Energy Homes: Enhancing the Code for Sustainable Homes
title_full_unstemmed Future-Proofed Energy Design Approaches for Achieving Low-Energy Homes: Enhancing the Code for Sustainable Homes
title_short Future-Proofed Energy Design Approaches for Achieving Low-Energy Homes: Enhancing the Code for Sustainable Homes
title_sort future proofed energy design approaches for achieving low energy homes enhancing the code for sustainable homes
topic code for sustainable homes
energy design
future-proofing
policy and practice
zero-carbon
url http://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/4/3/488
work_keys_str_mv AT mariachristinageorgiadou futureproofedenergydesignapproachesforachievinglowenergyhomesenhancingthecodeforsustainablehomes