Comparison of infection and complication rates associated with transvenous vs. subcutaneous defibrillators in patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease: a multicenter long-term retrospective follow-up

BackgroundPatients with progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at higher risk of infections and complications from cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). In patients with a primary or secondary prophylactic indication, implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD) can prevent sudden cardiac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fabian Schiedat, Benjamin Meuterodt, Magnus Prull, Assem Aweimer, Michael Gotzmann, Stephen O’Connor, Christian Perings, Johannes Korth, Thomas Lawo, Ibrahim El-Battrawy, Christoph Hanefeld, Andreas Mügge, Axel Kloppe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1397138/full
_version_ 1827288713530441728
author Fabian Schiedat
Fabian Schiedat
Benjamin Meuterodt
Magnus Prull
Assem Aweimer
Michael Gotzmann
Stephen O’Connor
Christian Perings
Johannes Korth
Thomas Lawo
Ibrahim El-Battrawy
Ibrahim El-Battrawy
Christoph Hanefeld
Andreas Mügge
Andreas Mügge
Axel Kloppe
Axel Kloppe
author_facet Fabian Schiedat
Fabian Schiedat
Benjamin Meuterodt
Magnus Prull
Assem Aweimer
Michael Gotzmann
Stephen O’Connor
Christian Perings
Johannes Korth
Thomas Lawo
Ibrahim El-Battrawy
Ibrahim El-Battrawy
Christoph Hanefeld
Andreas Mügge
Andreas Mügge
Axel Kloppe
Axel Kloppe
author_sort Fabian Schiedat
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundPatients with progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at higher risk of infections and complications from cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). In patients with a primary or secondary prophylactic indication, implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD) can prevent sudden cardiac deaths (SCD). We retrospectively compared transvenous-ICD (TV-ICD) and intermuscularly implanted subcutaneous-ICD (S-ICD) associated infections and complication rates together with hospitalizations in recipients with stage 4 kidney disease.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 70 patients from six German centers with stage 4 CKD who received either a prophylactic TV-ICD with a single right ventricular lead, 49 patients, or a S-ICD, 21 patients. Follow-Ups (FU) were performed bi-annually.ResultsThe TV-ICD patients were significantly older. This group had more patients with a history of atrial arrhythmias and more were prescribed anti-arrhythmic medication compared with the S-ICD group. There were no significant differences for other baseline characteristics. The median and interquartile range of FU durations were 55.2 (57.6–69.3) months. During FU, patients with a TV-ICD system experienced significantly more device associated infections (n = 8, 16.3% vs. n = 0; p < 0.05), device-associated complications (n = 13, 26.5% vs. n = 1, 4.8%; p < 0.05) and device associated hospitalizations (n = 10, 20.4% vs. n = 1, 4.8%; p < 0.05).ConclusionIn this long-term FU of patients with stage 4 CKD and an indication for a prophylactic ICD, the S-ICD was associated with significantly fewer device associated infections, complications and hospitalizations compared with TV-ICDs.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T11:36:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8136d9c4ecbf428db83a6de2e5ef04a2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-055X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T11:36:22Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
spelling doaj.art-8136d9c4ecbf428db83a6de2e5ef04a22024-04-10T05:21:21ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2297-055X2024-04-011110.3389/fcvm.2024.13971381397138Comparison of infection and complication rates associated with transvenous vs. subcutaneous defibrillators in patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease: a multicenter long-term retrospective follow-upFabian Schiedat0Fabian Schiedat1Benjamin Meuterodt2Magnus Prull3Assem Aweimer4Michael Gotzmann5Stephen O’Connor6Christian Perings7Johannes Korth8Thomas Lawo9Ibrahim El-Battrawy10Ibrahim El-Battrawy11Christoph Hanefeld12Andreas Mügge13Andreas Mügge14Axel Kloppe15Axel Kloppe16Department of Cardiology and Angiology, UniversityHospital Bergmannsheil Bochum of the Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, GermanyDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology at Marienhospital Gelsenkirchen, Academic Hospital of the Ruhr University Bochum, Gelsenkirchen, GermanyDepartment of Cardiology, Electrophysiology, Pneumology and Intensive Care Medicine, St. Marien-Hospital Luenen, Academic Hospital of the University Muenster, Luenen, GermanyDepartment of Cardiology, Augusta Hospital Bochum, Academic Hospital of the University Duisburg-Essen, Bochum, GermanyDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, UniversityHospital Bergmannsheil Bochum of the Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, GermanyDepartment of Cardiology, Katholische Kliniken Bochum of the Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, GermanyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, City, University of London, London, United KingdomDepartment of Cardiology, Electrophysiology, Pneumology and Intensive Care Medicine, St. Marien-Hospital Luenen, Academic Hospital of the University Muenster, Luenen, GermanyDepartment of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, GermanyDepartment of Cardiology, Elisabeth Hospital Recklinghausen, Recklinghausen, GermanyDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, UniversityHospital Bergmannsheil Bochum of the Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, GermanyDepartment of Molecular and Experimental Cardiology, Institut für Forschung und Lehre (IFL), Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, GermanyDepartment of Cardiology, Katholische Kliniken Bochum of the Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, GermanyDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, UniversityHospital Bergmannsheil Bochum of the Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, GermanyDepartment of Cardiology, Katholische Kliniken Bochum of the Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, GermanyDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, UniversityHospital Bergmannsheil Bochum of the Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, GermanyDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology at Marienhospital Gelsenkirchen, Academic Hospital of the Ruhr University Bochum, Gelsenkirchen, GermanyBackgroundPatients with progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at higher risk of infections and complications from cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). In patients with a primary or secondary prophylactic indication, implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD) can prevent sudden cardiac deaths (SCD). We retrospectively compared transvenous-ICD (TV-ICD) and intermuscularly implanted subcutaneous-ICD (S-ICD) associated infections and complication rates together with hospitalizations in recipients with stage 4 kidney disease.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 70 patients from six German centers with stage 4 CKD who received either a prophylactic TV-ICD with a single right ventricular lead, 49 patients, or a S-ICD, 21 patients. Follow-Ups (FU) were performed bi-annually.ResultsThe TV-ICD patients were significantly older. This group had more patients with a history of atrial arrhythmias and more were prescribed anti-arrhythmic medication compared with the S-ICD group. There were no significant differences for other baseline characteristics. The median and interquartile range of FU durations were 55.2 (57.6–69.3) months. During FU, patients with a TV-ICD system experienced significantly more device associated infections (n = 8, 16.3% vs. n = 0; p < 0.05), device-associated complications (n = 13, 26.5% vs. n = 1, 4.8%; p < 0.05) and device associated hospitalizations (n = 10, 20.4% vs. n = 1, 4.8%; p < 0.05).ConclusionIn this long-term FU of patients with stage 4 CKD and an indication for a prophylactic ICD, the S-ICD was associated with significantly fewer device associated infections, complications and hospitalizations compared with TV-ICDs.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1397138/fullsudden cardiac death (SCD)implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD)S-ICDdevice infectiondevice complicationchronic kidney disease
spellingShingle Fabian Schiedat
Fabian Schiedat
Benjamin Meuterodt
Magnus Prull
Assem Aweimer
Michael Gotzmann
Stephen O’Connor
Christian Perings
Johannes Korth
Thomas Lawo
Ibrahim El-Battrawy
Ibrahim El-Battrawy
Christoph Hanefeld
Andreas Mügge
Andreas Mügge
Axel Kloppe
Axel Kloppe
Comparison of infection and complication rates associated with transvenous vs. subcutaneous defibrillators in patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease: a multicenter long-term retrospective follow-up
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
sudden cardiac death (SCD)
implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD)
S-ICD
device infection
device complication
chronic kidney disease
title Comparison of infection and complication rates associated with transvenous vs. subcutaneous defibrillators in patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease: a multicenter long-term retrospective follow-up
title_full Comparison of infection and complication rates associated with transvenous vs. subcutaneous defibrillators in patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease: a multicenter long-term retrospective follow-up
title_fullStr Comparison of infection and complication rates associated with transvenous vs. subcutaneous defibrillators in patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease: a multicenter long-term retrospective follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of infection and complication rates associated with transvenous vs. subcutaneous defibrillators in patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease: a multicenter long-term retrospective follow-up
title_short Comparison of infection and complication rates associated with transvenous vs. subcutaneous defibrillators in patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease: a multicenter long-term retrospective follow-up
title_sort comparison of infection and complication rates associated with transvenous vs subcutaneous defibrillators in patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease a multicenter long term retrospective follow up
topic sudden cardiac death (SCD)
implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD)
S-ICD
device infection
device complication
chronic kidney disease
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1397138/full
work_keys_str_mv AT fabianschiedat comparisonofinfectionandcomplicationratesassociatedwithtransvenousvssubcutaneousdefibrillatorsinpatientswithstage4chronickidneydiseaseamulticenterlongtermretrospectivefollowup
AT fabianschiedat comparisonofinfectionandcomplicationratesassociatedwithtransvenousvssubcutaneousdefibrillatorsinpatientswithstage4chronickidneydiseaseamulticenterlongtermretrospectivefollowup
AT benjaminmeuterodt comparisonofinfectionandcomplicationratesassociatedwithtransvenousvssubcutaneousdefibrillatorsinpatientswithstage4chronickidneydiseaseamulticenterlongtermretrospectivefollowup
AT magnusprull comparisonofinfectionandcomplicationratesassociatedwithtransvenousvssubcutaneousdefibrillatorsinpatientswithstage4chronickidneydiseaseamulticenterlongtermretrospectivefollowup
AT assemaweimer comparisonofinfectionandcomplicationratesassociatedwithtransvenousvssubcutaneousdefibrillatorsinpatientswithstage4chronickidneydiseaseamulticenterlongtermretrospectivefollowup
AT michaelgotzmann comparisonofinfectionandcomplicationratesassociatedwithtransvenousvssubcutaneousdefibrillatorsinpatientswithstage4chronickidneydiseaseamulticenterlongtermretrospectivefollowup
AT stephenoconnor comparisonofinfectionandcomplicationratesassociatedwithtransvenousvssubcutaneousdefibrillatorsinpatientswithstage4chronickidneydiseaseamulticenterlongtermretrospectivefollowup
AT christianperings comparisonofinfectionandcomplicationratesassociatedwithtransvenousvssubcutaneousdefibrillatorsinpatientswithstage4chronickidneydiseaseamulticenterlongtermretrospectivefollowup
AT johanneskorth comparisonofinfectionandcomplicationratesassociatedwithtransvenousvssubcutaneousdefibrillatorsinpatientswithstage4chronickidneydiseaseamulticenterlongtermretrospectivefollowup
AT thomaslawo comparisonofinfectionandcomplicationratesassociatedwithtransvenousvssubcutaneousdefibrillatorsinpatientswithstage4chronickidneydiseaseamulticenterlongtermretrospectivefollowup
AT ibrahimelbattrawy comparisonofinfectionandcomplicationratesassociatedwithtransvenousvssubcutaneousdefibrillatorsinpatientswithstage4chronickidneydiseaseamulticenterlongtermretrospectivefollowup
AT ibrahimelbattrawy comparisonofinfectionandcomplicationratesassociatedwithtransvenousvssubcutaneousdefibrillatorsinpatientswithstage4chronickidneydiseaseamulticenterlongtermretrospectivefollowup
AT christophhanefeld comparisonofinfectionandcomplicationratesassociatedwithtransvenousvssubcutaneousdefibrillatorsinpatientswithstage4chronickidneydiseaseamulticenterlongtermretrospectivefollowup
AT andreasmugge comparisonofinfectionandcomplicationratesassociatedwithtransvenousvssubcutaneousdefibrillatorsinpatientswithstage4chronickidneydiseaseamulticenterlongtermretrospectivefollowup
AT andreasmugge comparisonofinfectionandcomplicationratesassociatedwithtransvenousvssubcutaneousdefibrillatorsinpatientswithstage4chronickidneydiseaseamulticenterlongtermretrospectivefollowup
AT axelkloppe comparisonofinfectionandcomplicationratesassociatedwithtransvenousvssubcutaneousdefibrillatorsinpatientswithstage4chronickidneydiseaseamulticenterlongtermretrospectivefollowup
AT axelkloppe comparisonofinfectionandcomplicationratesassociatedwithtransvenousvssubcutaneousdefibrillatorsinpatientswithstage4chronickidneydiseaseamulticenterlongtermretrospectivefollowup