Comparison of the Cumulative Live Birth Rates of Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation and Flexible GnRH Antagonist Protocols in Patients With Low Prognosis
ObjectiveTo compare the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) of the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol with that of the flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in patients with poor prognosis diagnosed per the POSEIDON criteria.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study. Low-prognosis wom...
Main Authors: | Mingze Du, Junwei Zhang, Zhen Li, Xinmi Liu, Jing Li, Wenxia Liu, Yichun Guan |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Endocrinology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2021.705264/full |
Similar Items
-
Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation versus GnRH Antagonist Protocol for Ovarian Stimulation in IVF: A Prospective Pilot Study
by: Tien K. Le, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01) -
Non-inferiority of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus GnRH antagonist protocol: A propensity score-weighted analysis
by: Le Duc Thang, et al.
Published: (2024-04-01) -
GnRH Antagonist/Letrozole Versus Microdose GnRH Agonist Flare Protocol in Poor Responders Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization
by: Robab Davar, et al.
Published: (2010-09-01) -
Outcomes of a GnRH Agonist Trigger Following a GnRH Antagonist or Flexible Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Cycle
by: Erkan Kalafat, et al.
Published: (2022-05-01) -
Comparison of the neonatal outcomes of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation and flexible GnRH antagonist protocols: a propensity score–matched cohort study
by: Mingze Du, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01)