Impact of antiepileptic-drug treatment burden on health-care-resource utilization and costs

Krithika Rajagopalan,1 Sean D Candrilli,2 Mayank Ajmera2 1Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc, Marlborough, MA 01752, USA; 2RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA Background: Complex titration requirements and dosing of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may pose a significant treatment burden...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rajagopalan K, Candrilli SD, Ajmera M
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2018-10-01
Series:ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/impact-of-antiepileptic-drug-treatment-burden-on-health-care-resource--peer-reviewed-article-CEOR
_version_ 1828405340306145280
author Rajagopalan K
Candrilli SD
Ajmera M
author_facet Rajagopalan K
Candrilli SD
Ajmera M
author_sort Rajagopalan K
collection DOAJ
description Krithika Rajagopalan,1 Sean D Candrilli,2 Mayank Ajmera2 1Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc, Marlborough, MA 01752, USA; 2RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA Background: Complex titration requirements and dosing of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may pose a significant treatment burden for patients with epilepsy. This study evaluated health-care-resource utilization (HCRU) rates and costs by treatment burden, defined as number of daily pills and dosing frequency, among managed-care enrollees with epilepsy who initiated AED monotherapy. Methods: This retrospective longitudinal study examined administrative HC-claim data in patients aged ≥18 years with two or more pharmacy claims for an AED and two or more medical claims for epilepsy or afebrile convulsion. The number of daily AED pills was estimated at index as the total number of pills dispensed divided by the days supplied, and categorized as more than zero/one, one/two, two/three, and more than three per day. AED-dosing frequency was measured at index and categorized as one, two, three, or four times daily. Postindex 12-month all-cause and epilepsy-related HCRU and costs were estimated using multivariable Poisson regression models and generalized linear models, respectively. Results: Unadjusted total all-cause and epilepsy-related costs at 12 months postindex averaged US$26,015 per person and US$5,557 per person (2017 values), respectively. Adjusted all-cause and epilepsy-related costs were US$25,918 per person and US$5,602 per person, respectively. A pill burden of more than three a day was associated with a 6.7% increase in total annual HC costs compared with one pill/day. Patients receiving one/two, two/three, and more than three pills per day had 13.3%, 23.9%, and 38.3% higher epilepsy-related costs, respectively, than those receiving one pill per day (P<0.0001). Increase in dosing frequency was associated with greater total HCRU and higher costs, but only patients with twice-daily dosing had significantly higher epilepsy-related costs. Conclusion: Findings from this study suggest that increased treatment burden is associated with greater HCRU and higher overall and epilepsy-related costs. Reducing treatment burden via selection of AED therapy with reduced pill numbers and dosing frequency should be considered to improve health and economic outcomes. Keywords: antiepileptic drugs, health-care-resource utilization, treatment burden, epilepsy-related costs
first_indexed 2024-12-10T10:52:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8162501d96874db0bc88ff3d52dd7e30
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1178-6981
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T10:52:32Z
publishDate 2018-10-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
spelling doaj.art-8162501d96874db0bc88ff3d52dd7e302022-12-22T01:51:58ZengDove Medical PressClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research1178-69812018-10-01Volume 1061962741506Impact of antiepileptic-drug treatment burden on health-care-resource utilization and costsRajagopalan KCandrilli SDAjmera MKrithika Rajagopalan,1 Sean D Candrilli,2 Mayank Ajmera2 1Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc, Marlborough, MA 01752, USA; 2RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA Background: Complex titration requirements and dosing of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may pose a significant treatment burden for patients with epilepsy. This study evaluated health-care-resource utilization (HCRU) rates and costs by treatment burden, defined as number of daily pills and dosing frequency, among managed-care enrollees with epilepsy who initiated AED monotherapy. Methods: This retrospective longitudinal study examined administrative HC-claim data in patients aged ≥18 years with two or more pharmacy claims for an AED and two or more medical claims for epilepsy or afebrile convulsion. The number of daily AED pills was estimated at index as the total number of pills dispensed divided by the days supplied, and categorized as more than zero/one, one/two, two/three, and more than three per day. AED-dosing frequency was measured at index and categorized as one, two, three, or four times daily. Postindex 12-month all-cause and epilepsy-related HCRU and costs were estimated using multivariable Poisson regression models and generalized linear models, respectively. Results: Unadjusted total all-cause and epilepsy-related costs at 12 months postindex averaged US$26,015 per person and US$5,557 per person (2017 values), respectively. Adjusted all-cause and epilepsy-related costs were US$25,918 per person and US$5,602 per person, respectively. A pill burden of more than three a day was associated with a 6.7% increase in total annual HC costs compared with one pill/day. Patients receiving one/two, two/three, and more than three pills per day had 13.3%, 23.9%, and 38.3% higher epilepsy-related costs, respectively, than those receiving one pill per day (P<0.0001). Increase in dosing frequency was associated with greater total HCRU and higher costs, but only patients with twice-daily dosing had significantly higher epilepsy-related costs. Conclusion: Findings from this study suggest that increased treatment burden is associated with greater HCRU and higher overall and epilepsy-related costs. Reducing treatment burden via selection of AED therapy with reduced pill numbers and dosing frequency should be considered to improve health and economic outcomes. Keywords: antiepileptic drugs, health-care-resource utilization, treatment burden, epilepsy-related costshttps://www.dovepress.com/impact-of-antiepileptic-drug-treatment-burden-on-health-care-resource--peer-reviewed-article-CEORantiepileptic drugshealthcare resource utilizationtreatment burdenepilepsy-related costs
spellingShingle Rajagopalan K
Candrilli SD
Ajmera M
Impact of antiepileptic-drug treatment burden on health-care-resource utilization and costs
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
antiepileptic drugs
healthcare resource utilization
treatment burden
epilepsy-related costs
title Impact of antiepileptic-drug treatment burden on health-care-resource utilization and costs
title_full Impact of antiepileptic-drug treatment burden on health-care-resource utilization and costs
title_fullStr Impact of antiepileptic-drug treatment burden on health-care-resource utilization and costs
title_full_unstemmed Impact of antiepileptic-drug treatment burden on health-care-resource utilization and costs
title_short Impact of antiepileptic-drug treatment burden on health-care-resource utilization and costs
title_sort impact of antiepileptic drug treatment burden on health care resource utilization and costs
topic antiepileptic drugs
healthcare resource utilization
treatment burden
epilepsy-related costs
url https://www.dovepress.com/impact-of-antiepileptic-drug-treatment-burden-on-health-care-resource--peer-reviewed-article-CEOR
work_keys_str_mv AT rajagopalank impactofantiepilepticdrugtreatmentburdenonhealthcareresourceutilizationandcosts
AT candrillisd impactofantiepilepticdrugtreatmentburdenonhealthcareresourceutilizationandcosts
AT ajmeram impactofantiepilepticdrugtreatmentburdenonhealthcareresourceutilizationandcosts