Factors influencing the temporal variability of atmospheric methane emissions from Upper Silesia coal mines: a case study from the CoMet mission

<p>Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas responsible for around 20 % of radiative forcing (relative to the pre-industrial era) caused by all long-lived greenhouse gases (WMO, 2021). About 60 % of the global emissions are from anthropogenic sources, and coal mining is one of the largest contribu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Swolkień, A. Fix, M. Gałkowski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2022-12-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/16031/2022/acp-22-16031-2022.pdf
_version_ 1811195215278505984
author J. Swolkień
A. Fix
M. Gałkowski
M. Gałkowski
author_facet J. Swolkień
A. Fix
M. Gałkowski
M. Gałkowski
author_sort J. Swolkień
collection DOAJ
description <p>Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas responsible for around 20 % of radiative forcing (relative to the pre-industrial era) caused by all long-lived greenhouse gases (WMO, 2021). About 60 % of the global emissions are from anthropogenic sources, and coal mining is one of the largest contributors. Emissions are either estimated by bottom-up approaches (based on inventories) or top-down approaches (based on atmospheric measurements). Combining those with an accurate error estimation allows us to better characterise model errors e.g. caused by transport mechanisms.</p> <p>Here we provide a detailed description of factors influencing the coal mine methane emission variability. We use high-frequency (up to hourly) temporal data from seven coal mines in the Upper Silesian Coal Basin during the Carbon dioxide and Methane (CoMet 1.0) mission from 14 May to 13 June 2018. Knowledge of these factors for the individual ventilation shaft is essential for linking the observations achieved during the CoMet 1.0 mission with models, as most publicly available data in the bottom-up worldwide inventories provide annual emissions only.</p> <p>The methane concentrations in examined shafts ranged from 0.10 % to <span class="inline-formula">0.55 <i>%</i>±0.1</span> % during the study period. Due to the changing scope of mining works performed underground, they were subjected to a significant variation on a day-to-day basis. The yearly methane average emission rate calculated based on 1 month's set of temporal data of the analysed subset of mines was of the order of 142.68 kt yr<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span> (<span class="inline-formula"><i>σ</i>=18.63</span> kt yr<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span>), an estimate 27 % lower than the officially published State Mining Authority (WUG) data and 36 % lower than reported to the European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (E-PRTR). We also found that emissions from individual coal mine facilities were over- and underestimated by between 4 % to 60 %, compared to the E-PRTR, when short-term records were analysed. We show that the observed discrepancies between annual emissions based on temporal data and public inventories result from (1) the incorrect assumption that the methane emissions are time-invariant, (2) the methodology of measurements, and lastly, (3) the frequency and timing of measurements.</p> <p>From the emission monitoring perspective, we recommend using a standardised emission measurement system for all coal mines, similar to the Methane Fire Teletransmission Monitoring System (SMP-NT/A). Legal safety requirements require all coal mines to implement this system. After an adaptation, the system could allow for gas flow quantification, necessary for accurate and precise estimations of methane emissions at a high temporal resolution. Using this system will also reduce the emission uncertainty due to factors like frequency and timing of measurements. In addition, it would be beneficial to separately identify the emissions from individual ventilation shafts and methane drainage stations. That would bridge the gap between bottom-up and top-down approaches for coal mine emissions. The intermittent releases of unutilised methane from the drainage stations are currently not considered when constructing regional methane budgets.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-12T00:39:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-819021f6ca514ba4a132876b0d648129
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T00:39:42Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
spelling doaj.art-819021f6ca514ba4a132876b0d6481292022-12-22T03:55:04ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242022-12-0122160311605210.5194/acp-22-16031-2022Factors influencing the temporal variability of atmospheric methane emissions from Upper Silesia coal mines: a case study from the CoMet missionJ. Swolkień0A. Fix1M. Gałkowski2M. Gałkowski3Faculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, PolandDeutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Oberpfaffenhofen, GermanyMax Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, GermanyFaculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland<p>Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas responsible for around 20 % of radiative forcing (relative to the pre-industrial era) caused by all long-lived greenhouse gases (WMO, 2021). About 60 % of the global emissions are from anthropogenic sources, and coal mining is one of the largest contributors. Emissions are either estimated by bottom-up approaches (based on inventories) or top-down approaches (based on atmospheric measurements). Combining those with an accurate error estimation allows us to better characterise model errors e.g. caused by transport mechanisms.</p> <p>Here we provide a detailed description of factors influencing the coal mine methane emission variability. We use high-frequency (up to hourly) temporal data from seven coal mines in the Upper Silesian Coal Basin during the Carbon dioxide and Methane (CoMet 1.0) mission from 14 May to 13 June 2018. Knowledge of these factors for the individual ventilation shaft is essential for linking the observations achieved during the CoMet 1.0 mission with models, as most publicly available data in the bottom-up worldwide inventories provide annual emissions only.</p> <p>The methane concentrations in examined shafts ranged from 0.10 % to <span class="inline-formula">0.55 <i>%</i>±0.1</span> % during the study period. Due to the changing scope of mining works performed underground, they were subjected to a significant variation on a day-to-day basis. The yearly methane average emission rate calculated based on 1 month's set of temporal data of the analysed subset of mines was of the order of 142.68 kt yr<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span> (<span class="inline-formula"><i>σ</i>=18.63</span> kt yr<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span>), an estimate 27 % lower than the officially published State Mining Authority (WUG) data and 36 % lower than reported to the European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (E-PRTR). We also found that emissions from individual coal mine facilities were over- and underestimated by between 4 % to 60 %, compared to the E-PRTR, when short-term records were analysed. We show that the observed discrepancies between annual emissions based on temporal data and public inventories result from (1) the incorrect assumption that the methane emissions are time-invariant, (2) the methodology of measurements, and lastly, (3) the frequency and timing of measurements.</p> <p>From the emission monitoring perspective, we recommend using a standardised emission measurement system for all coal mines, similar to the Methane Fire Teletransmission Monitoring System (SMP-NT/A). Legal safety requirements require all coal mines to implement this system. After an adaptation, the system could allow for gas flow quantification, necessary for accurate and precise estimations of methane emissions at a high temporal resolution. Using this system will also reduce the emission uncertainty due to factors like frequency and timing of measurements. In addition, it would be beneficial to separately identify the emissions from individual ventilation shafts and methane drainage stations. That would bridge the gap between bottom-up and top-down approaches for coal mine emissions. The intermittent releases of unutilised methane from the drainage stations are currently not considered when constructing regional methane budgets.</p>https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/16031/2022/acp-22-16031-2022.pdf
spellingShingle J. Swolkień
A. Fix
M. Gałkowski
M. Gałkowski
Factors influencing the temporal variability of atmospheric methane emissions from Upper Silesia coal mines: a case study from the CoMet mission
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
title Factors influencing the temporal variability of atmospheric methane emissions from Upper Silesia coal mines: a case study from the CoMet mission
title_full Factors influencing the temporal variability of atmospheric methane emissions from Upper Silesia coal mines: a case study from the CoMet mission
title_fullStr Factors influencing the temporal variability of atmospheric methane emissions from Upper Silesia coal mines: a case study from the CoMet mission
title_full_unstemmed Factors influencing the temporal variability of atmospheric methane emissions from Upper Silesia coal mines: a case study from the CoMet mission
title_short Factors influencing the temporal variability of atmospheric methane emissions from Upper Silesia coal mines: a case study from the CoMet mission
title_sort factors influencing the temporal variability of atmospheric methane emissions from upper silesia coal mines a case study from the comet mission
url https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/16031/2022/acp-22-16031-2022.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jswolkien factorsinfluencingthetemporalvariabilityofatmosphericmethaneemissionsfromuppersilesiacoalminesacasestudyfromthecometmission
AT afix factorsinfluencingthetemporalvariabilityofatmosphericmethaneemissionsfromuppersilesiacoalminesacasestudyfromthecometmission
AT mgałkowski factorsinfluencingthetemporalvariabilityofatmosphericmethaneemissionsfromuppersilesiacoalminesacasestudyfromthecometmission
AT mgałkowski factorsinfluencingthetemporalvariabilityofatmosphericmethaneemissionsfromuppersilesiacoalminesacasestudyfromthecometmission