Relationship between occupational and leisure-time physical activity and the need for recovery after work

Abstract Background Health benefits of physical activity are very well acknowledged but the role of both occupational physical activity (OPA) and leisure time physical activity (LTPA) in recovery after work is not thoroughly understood. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tiina Karihtala, Anu M. Valtonen, Hannu Kautiainen, Leila Hopsu, Janne Halonen, Ari Heinonen, Sampsa Puttonen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-02-01
Series:Archives of Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-022-01017-8
_version_ 1811166068181303296
author Tiina Karihtala
Anu M. Valtonen
Hannu Kautiainen
Leila Hopsu
Janne Halonen
Ari Heinonen
Sampsa Puttonen
author_facet Tiina Karihtala
Anu M. Valtonen
Hannu Kautiainen
Leila Hopsu
Janne Halonen
Ari Heinonen
Sampsa Puttonen
author_sort Tiina Karihtala
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Health benefits of physical activity are very well acknowledged but the role of both occupational physical activity (OPA) and leisure time physical activity (LTPA) in recovery after work is not thoroughly understood. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between accelerometer-measured OPA and LTPA and the need for recovery after work (NFR) in early childhood education and care (ECEC) professionals. Methods The study participants were 217 female ECEC professionals aged 17–64. Physical activity was recorded with a three-axis accelerometer (ActiGraph GT9X Link, ActiGraph, USA) for seven consecutive days. Separate analyses were conducted for both OPA and LTPA and reported as hours/day based on different intensity levels (light, moderate, vigorous, very vigorous). The NFR was measured with the Need For Recovery (NFR) scale (0%–100%). Results Participants’ average physical activity for both OPA and LTPA was about 4 h/day, and the mean NFR score was 38.4%. OPA was significantly associated with the NFR but not with LTPA. The relationship remained significant after adjustments for age, body mass index, work ability, mental health status, and sleep difficulties (p < 0.024). Conclusion According to this study, the OPA level is related to the level of the NFR in female ECEC professionals. Based on the results, it seems that LTPA has no relevance to the NFR. Results suggest that long-lasting OPA, even without strenuous physical activity at work, may predispose individuals to a high NFR.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T15:46:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8195e9c3f6d14b7c946e3ba6482d598e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2049-3258
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T15:46:30Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Archives of Public Health
spelling doaj.art-8195e9c3f6d14b7c946e3ba6482d598e2023-02-12T12:05:16ZengBMCArchives of Public Health2049-32582023-02-018111910.1186/s13690-022-01017-8Relationship between occupational and leisure-time physical activity and the need for recovery after workTiina Karihtala0Anu M. Valtonen1Hannu Kautiainen2Leila Hopsu3Janne Halonen4Ari Heinonen5Sampsa Puttonen6Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of JyväskyläMetropolia University of Applied SciencesPrimary Health Care Unit, Kuopio University HospitalMyontec OyFinnish Institute of Occupational HealthFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of JyväskyläFaculty of Social Sciences, University of TampereAbstract Background Health benefits of physical activity are very well acknowledged but the role of both occupational physical activity (OPA) and leisure time physical activity (LTPA) in recovery after work is not thoroughly understood. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between accelerometer-measured OPA and LTPA and the need for recovery after work (NFR) in early childhood education and care (ECEC) professionals. Methods The study participants were 217 female ECEC professionals aged 17–64. Physical activity was recorded with a three-axis accelerometer (ActiGraph GT9X Link, ActiGraph, USA) for seven consecutive days. Separate analyses were conducted for both OPA and LTPA and reported as hours/day based on different intensity levels (light, moderate, vigorous, very vigorous). The NFR was measured with the Need For Recovery (NFR) scale (0%–100%). Results Participants’ average physical activity for both OPA and LTPA was about 4 h/day, and the mean NFR score was 38.4%. OPA was significantly associated with the NFR but not with LTPA. The relationship remained significant after adjustments for age, body mass index, work ability, mental health status, and sleep difficulties (p < 0.024). Conclusion According to this study, the OPA level is related to the level of the NFR in female ECEC professionals. Based on the results, it seems that LTPA has no relevance to the NFR. Results suggest that long-lasting OPA, even without strenuous physical activity at work, may predispose individuals to a high NFR.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-022-01017-8Occupational physical activityLeisure-time physical activityNeed for recovery after workAccelerometer
spellingShingle Tiina Karihtala
Anu M. Valtonen
Hannu Kautiainen
Leila Hopsu
Janne Halonen
Ari Heinonen
Sampsa Puttonen
Relationship between occupational and leisure-time physical activity and the need for recovery after work
Archives of Public Health
Occupational physical activity
Leisure-time physical activity
Need for recovery after work
Accelerometer
title Relationship between occupational and leisure-time physical activity and the need for recovery after work
title_full Relationship between occupational and leisure-time physical activity and the need for recovery after work
title_fullStr Relationship between occupational and leisure-time physical activity and the need for recovery after work
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between occupational and leisure-time physical activity and the need for recovery after work
title_short Relationship between occupational and leisure-time physical activity and the need for recovery after work
title_sort relationship between occupational and leisure time physical activity and the need for recovery after work
topic Occupational physical activity
Leisure-time physical activity
Need for recovery after work
Accelerometer
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-022-01017-8
work_keys_str_mv AT tiinakarihtala relationshipbetweenoccupationalandleisuretimephysicalactivityandtheneedforrecoveryafterwork
AT anumvaltonen relationshipbetweenoccupationalandleisuretimephysicalactivityandtheneedforrecoveryafterwork
AT hannukautiainen relationshipbetweenoccupationalandleisuretimephysicalactivityandtheneedforrecoveryafterwork
AT leilahopsu relationshipbetweenoccupationalandleisuretimephysicalactivityandtheneedforrecoveryafterwork
AT jannehalonen relationshipbetweenoccupationalandleisuretimephysicalactivityandtheneedforrecoveryafterwork
AT ariheinonen relationshipbetweenoccupationalandleisuretimephysicalactivityandtheneedforrecoveryafterwork
AT sampsaputtonen relationshipbetweenoccupationalandleisuretimephysicalactivityandtheneedforrecoveryafterwork