Evaluation of Speech and Language Features of Children Born after Assisted Reproductive Techniques
Objective: To evaluate some speech and language features of children born after assisted reproductive techniques (ART). Materials & Methods: In this descriptive and analytical study, fifty children between 0– 49 months were selected simply and conveniently by consecutive method and evaluated v...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences
2010-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Rehabilitation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://rehabilitationj.uswr.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-44-40&slc_lang=en&sid=1 |
_version_ | 1818268915949633536 |
---|---|
author | Soudabeh Nouri Ramin Mozaffari-Kermani Jalil Kouhpayeh-Zadeh Shabnam Zoljalali |
author_facet | Soudabeh Nouri Ramin Mozaffari-Kermani Jalil Kouhpayeh-Zadeh Shabnam Zoljalali |
author_sort | Soudabeh Nouri |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objective: To evaluate some speech and language features of children born after assisted reproductive techniques (ART).
Materials & Methods: In this descriptive and analytical study, fifty children between 0– 49 months were selected simply and conveniently by consecutive method and evaluated via interview with their parents and clinical observation, by a speech and language pathologist. A questionnaire was completed after parent interview. The ELM–2 (Early Language Milestone Scale–2), MLU (Mean Length Utterance) test and POSP (Paediatric Oral Skill Pakage) were employed. Data were analyzed by Independent T Test, Mann–Whitney Test, Chi Square and Kolmogorov Smirnov Test.
Results: 33 children (66%) were born through intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) , and the reminder through invitro fertilization (IVF) or intrauterine insemination (IUI). Mean Length Utterance (MLU) was 3.3 words. 8% of these children had some structural anomalies in speech organs and 6% of them showed speech organs dysfunction. There was no gender priority in MLU (P=0.069), cooing (P=0.125), number of words (P=0.079) and structure and function of speech organs (P=0.327). There was significant difference between boys and girls in lalling (P=0.026).
Conclusion: Speech and language of children born after assisted reproductive techniques (ART) are normal but more comprehensive studies are needed. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-12T20:46:05Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-81d2c6d7e69945578b43a5572c4dc74a |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1607-2960 1607-2960 |
language | fas |
last_indexed | 2024-12-12T20:46:05Z |
publishDate | 2010-01-01 |
publisher | University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Rehabilitation |
spelling | doaj.art-81d2c6d7e69945578b43a5572c4dc74a2022-12-22T00:12:34ZfasUniversity of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation SciencesJournal of Rehabilitation1607-29601607-29602010-01-0110400Evaluation of Speech and Language Features of Children Born after Assisted Reproductive TechniquesSoudabeh Nouri0Ramin Mozaffari-Kermani1Jalil Kouhpayeh-Zadeh2Shabnam Zoljalali3 Research Center of Child Health & Growth, University Jehad of Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Objective: To evaluate some speech and language features of children born after assisted reproductive techniques (ART). Materials & Methods: In this descriptive and analytical study, fifty children between 0– 49 months were selected simply and conveniently by consecutive method and evaluated via interview with their parents and clinical observation, by a speech and language pathologist. A questionnaire was completed after parent interview. The ELM–2 (Early Language Milestone Scale–2), MLU (Mean Length Utterance) test and POSP (Paediatric Oral Skill Pakage) were employed. Data were analyzed by Independent T Test, Mann–Whitney Test, Chi Square and Kolmogorov Smirnov Test. Results: 33 children (66%) were born through intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) , and the reminder through invitro fertilization (IVF) or intrauterine insemination (IUI). Mean Length Utterance (MLU) was 3.3 words. 8% of these children had some structural anomalies in speech organs and 6% of them showed speech organs dysfunction. There was no gender priority in MLU (P=0.069), cooing (P=0.125), number of words (P=0.079) and structure and function of speech organs (P=0.327). There was significant difference between boys and girls in lalling (P=0.026). Conclusion: Speech and language of children born after assisted reproductive techniques (ART) are normal but more comprehensive studies are needed.http://rehabilitationj.uswr.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-44-40&slc_lang=en&sid=1Speech features Language features Assisted reproductiveTechniques Speech organs |
spellingShingle | Soudabeh Nouri Ramin Mozaffari-Kermani Jalil Kouhpayeh-Zadeh Shabnam Zoljalali Evaluation of Speech and Language Features of Children Born after Assisted Reproductive Techniques Journal of Rehabilitation Speech features Language features Assisted reproductive Techniques Speech organs |
title | Evaluation of Speech and Language Features of Children Born after Assisted Reproductive Techniques |
title_full | Evaluation of Speech and Language Features of Children Born after Assisted Reproductive Techniques |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Speech and Language Features of Children Born after Assisted Reproductive Techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Speech and Language Features of Children Born after Assisted Reproductive Techniques |
title_short | Evaluation of Speech and Language Features of Children Born after Assisted Reproductive Techniques |
title_sort | evaluation of speech and language features of children born after assisted reproductive techniques |
topic | Speech features Language features Assisted reproductive Techniques Speech organs |
url | http://rehabilitationj.uswr.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-44-40&slc_lang=en&sid=1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soudabehnouri evaluationofspeechandlanguagefeaturesofchildrenbornafterassistedreproductivetechniques AT raminmozaffarikermani evaluationofspeechandlanguagefeaturesofchildrenbornafterassistedreproductivetechniques AT jalilkouhpayehzadeh evaluationofspeechandlanguagefeaturesofchildrenbornafterassistedreproductivetechniques AT shabnamzoljalali evaluationofspeechandlanguagefeaturesofchildrenbornafterassistedreproductivetechniques |