Comparative assessment of enamel remineralisation on the surface microhardness of demineralized enamel - an in vitro study
Objective The main objective of the study was to compare two different remineralising materials containing casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate, bioactive glass on enamel surface microhardness. Materials and Methods Thirty premolars were used for specimen preparation. Group 1 (the contr...
| Asıl Yazarlar: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Materyal Türü: | Makale |
| Dil: | English |
| Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: |
PeerJ Inc.
2022-10-01
|
| Seri Bilgileri: | PeerJ |
| Konular: | |
| Online Erişim: | https://peerj.com/articles/14098.pdf |
| _version_ | 1827608463983771648 |
|---|---|
| author | Bhavika Bhavsar Mary Vijo Pranjely Sharma Tulika Patnaik Mohammad Khursheed Alam Santosh Patil |
| author_facet | Bhavika Bhavsar Mary Vijo Pranjely Sharma Tulika Patnaik Mohammad Khursheed Alam Santosh Patil |
| author_sort | Bhavika Bhavsar |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective The main objective of the study was to compare two different remineralising materials containing casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate, bioactive glass on enamel surface microhardness. Materials and Methods Thirty premolars were used for specimen preparation. Group 1 (the control group) consisted of intact enamel samples, group 2: CPP-ACPF (Tooth Mousse Plus), group 3: bioenamel remineralising gel (Prevest DenPro). All specimens were subjected to demineralisation except the control group, followed by which remineralising agents were applied. A universal hardness tester was used to assess the surface microhardness of all samples. Results were analysed using one-way ANOVA test and comparison was analysed using Scheffe’s post hoc least significant difference (LSD) test. Results Both remineralising agents used in groups 2 and 3 have shown significant outcome in terms of improving the surface microhardness in comparison with the control group. Group 2 increased the enamel hardness by 8.34 where P = 0.023 whereas group 3 increased the hardness by 5.87, where P = 0.01. Conclusion Group 2 has a superior hardness value than group 3; however, no statistically significant results were obtained between both the groups. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T07:12:24Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-81d9260bc7ef4c068b159a0c02f87202 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2167-8359 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T07:12:24Z |
| publishDate | 2022-10-01 |
| publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PeerJ |
| spelling | doaj.art-81d9260bc7ef4c068b159a0c02f872022023-12-03T08:59:41ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592022-10-0110e1409810.7717/peerj.14098Comparative assessment of enamel remineralisation on the surface microhardness of demineralized enamel - an in vitro studyBhavika Bhavsar0Mary Vijo1Pranjely Sharma2Tulika Patnaik3Mohammad Khursheed Alam4Santosh Patil5Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Rkdf Dental College and Research Centre, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, IndiaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Rkdf Dental College and Research Centre, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, IndiaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Rkdf Dental College and Research Centre, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, IndiaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Rkdf Dental College and Research Centre, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, IndiaOrthodontics, Preventive Dentistry Department, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, New Horizon Dental College and Research Institute, Sakri, Bilaspur, IndiaObjective The main objective of the study was to compare two different remineralising materials containing casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate, bioactive glass on enamel surface microhardness. Materials and Methods Thirty premolars were used for specimen preparation. Group 1 (the control group) consisted of intact enamel samples, group 2: CPP-ACPF (Tooth Mousse Plus), group 3: bioenamel remineralising gel (Prevest DenPro). All specimens were subjected to demineralisation except the control group, followed by which remineralising agents were applied. A universal hardness tester was used to assess the surface microhardness of all samples. Results were analysed using one-way ANOVA test and comparison was analysed using Scheffe’s post hoc least significant difference (LSD) test. Results Both remineralising agents used in groups 2 and 3 have shown significant outcome in terms of improving the surface microhardness in comparison with the control group. Group 2 increased the enamel hardness by 8.34 where P = 0.023 whereas group 3 increased the hardness by 5.87, where P = 0.01. Conclusion Group 2 has a superior hardness value than group 3; however, no statistically significant results were obtained between both the groups.https://peerj.com/articles/14098.pdfCarious lesionsMicrohardnessFluorideRemineralisationBioglassHydroxyapatite |
| spellingShingle | Bhavika Bhavsar Mary Vijo Pranjely Sharma Tulika Patnaik Mohammad Khursheed Alam Santosh Patil Comparative assessment of enamel remineralisation on the surface microhardness of demineralized enamel - an in vitro study PeerJ Carious lesions Microhardness Fluoride Remineralisation Bioglass Hydroxyapatite |
| title | Comparative assessment of enamel remineralisation on the surface microhardness of demineralized enamel - an in vitro study |
| title_full | Comparative assessment of enamel remineralisation on the surface microhardness of demineralized enamel - an in vitro study |
| title_fullStr | Comparative assessment of enamel remineralisation on the surface microhardness of demineralized enamel - an in vitro study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative assessment of enamel remineralisation on the surface microhardness of demineralized enamel - an in vitro study |
| title_short | Comparative assessment of enamel remineralisation on the surface microhardness of demineralized enamel - an in vitro study |
| title_sort | comparative assessment of enamel remineralisation on the surface microhardness of demineralized enamel an in vitro study |
| topic | Carious lesions Microhardness Fluoride Remineralisation Bioglass Hydroxyapatite |
| url | https://peerj.com/articles/14098.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bhavikabhavsar comparativeassessmentofenamelremineralisationonthesurfacemicrohardnessofdemineralizedenamelaninvitrostudy AT maryvijo comparativeassessmentofenamelremineralisationonthesurfacemicrohardnessofdemineralizedenamelaninvitrostudy AT pranjelysharma comparativeassessmentofenamelremineralisationonthesurfacemicrohardnessofdemineralizedenamelaninvitrostudy AT tulikapatnaik comparativeassessmentofenamelremineralisationonthesurfacemicrohardnessofdemineralizedenamelaninvitrostudy AT mohammadkhursheedalam comparativeassessmentofenamelremineralisationonthesurfacemicrohardnessofdemineralizedenamelaninvitrostudy AT santoshpatil comparativeassessmentofenamelremineralisationonthesurfacemicrohardnessofdemineralizedenamelaninvitrostudy |