Using Gaze Tracking as a Research Tool in the Deaf Health Literacy and Access to Health Information Project: Protocol for a Multisite Mixed Methods Study and Preliminary Results
BackgroundPrevious studies have identified the internet as a major source of health information. Reliable and accessible sources of web-based health information are critical for cultivating patient-centered care. However, the accessibility and use of web-based health informat...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2021-09-01
|
| Series: | JMIR Research Protocols |
| Online Access: | https://www.researchprotocols.org/2021/9/e26708 |
| _version_ | 1797735747310059520 |
|---|---|
| author | Sara Champlin Jessica Cuculick Peter C Hauser Kelley Wyse Michael M McKee |
| author_facet | Sara Champlin Jessica Cuculick Peter C Hauser Kelley Wyse Michael M McKee |
| author_sort | Sara Champlin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
BackgroundPrevious studies have identified the internet as a major source of health information. Reliable and accessible sources of web-based health information are critical for cultivating patient-centered care. However, the accessibility and use of web-based health information remains largely unknown for deaf individuals. We used gaze-tracking technology to understand the navigation and use of web-based health information by deaf adults who communicate with sign language and by hearing adults.
ObjectiveThis paper discusses our protocol for implementing gaze-tracking technology in a study that included both deaf and hearing participants. We report the preliminary results and lessons learned from the implementation of the protocol.
MethodsWe conducted gaze-tracking sessions with 450 deaf signers and 450 hearing participants as a part of a larger, multisite mixed methods research study. Then, we conducted qualitative elicitation interviews with a subsample of 21 deaf and 13 hearing participants, who engaged in a search task and reviewed their gaze recordings. To our knowledge, no study has implemented a similar research protocol to better understand the experiences of deaf adults. As such, we also examined research staff notes and observations from team meetings regarding the conduct of gaze-tracking data to delineate lessons learned and best practices for research protocols in this area.
ResultsFindings from the implementation of this study protocol highlight the use of gaze technology with deaf participants. We developed additional protocol steps to minimize gaze disruption from either lipreading or communicating in sign language. For example, research assistants were often unable to maintain eye contact with participants while signing because of the need to simultaneously point at the computer monitor to provide instructions related to gaze study components, such as the calibration process. In addition to developing ways to effectively provide instructions in American Sign Language, a practice exercise was included in the gaze tracker session to familiarize participants with the computer and technology. The use of the playback feature permitted a deeper dialogue between researchers and participants, which we found vital for understanding the experiences of deaf participants.
ConclusionsOn the basis of our experience using the study protocol through a large research project, incorporating gaze-tracking technology offers beneficial avenues for better understanding how individuals interact with health information. Gaze tracking can determine the type and placement of visual content that attracts attention from the viewers of diverse backgrounds, including deaf individuals. The lessons learned through this study will help future researchers in determining ideal study designs, such as suitable protocols and participant characteristics (eg, deaf signers), while including gaze trackers in their projects. This approach explored how different ways of presenting health information can affect or enable visual learners to engage and use health information effectively.
International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)RR1-10.2196/26708 |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T13:03:34Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-81e67ada1044467abd230513f223d9e3 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1929-0748 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T13:03:34Z |
| publishDate | 2021-09-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | JMIR Research Protocols |
| spelling | doaj.art-81e67ada1044467abd230513f223d9e32023-08-28T19:00:41ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Research Protocols1929-07482021-09-01109e2670810.2196/26708Using Gaze Tracking as a Research Tool in the Deaf Health Literacy and Access to Health Information Project: Protocol for a Multisite Mixed Methods Study and Preliminary ResultsSara Champlinhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8138-7830Jessica Cuculickhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6018-3812Peter C Hauserhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5949-5920Kelley Wysehttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7879-972XMichael M McKeehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5561-9885 BackgroundPrevious studies have identified the internet as a major source of health information. Reliable and accessible sources of web-based health information are critical for cultivating patient-centered care. However, the accessibility and use of web-based health information remains largely unknown for deaf individuals. We used gaze-tracking technology to understand the navigation and use of web-based health information by deaf adults who communicate with sign language and by hearing adults. ObjectiveThis paper discusses our protocol for implementing gaze-tracking technology in a study that included both deaf and hearing participants. We report the preliminary results and lessons learned from the implementation of the protocol. MethodsWe conducted gaze-tracking sessions with 450 deaf signers and 450 hearing participants as a part of a larger, multisite mixed methods research study. Then, we conducted qualitative elicitation interviews with a subsample of 21 deaf and 13 hearing participants, who engaged in a search task and reviewed their gaze recordings. To our knowledge, no study has implemented a similar research protocol to better understand the experiences of deaf adults. As such, we also examined research staff notes and observations from team meetings regarding the conduct of gaze-tracking data to delineate lessons learned and best practices for research protocols in this area. ResultsFindings from the implementation of this study protocol highlight the use of gaze technology with deaf participants. We developed additional protocol steps to minimize gaze disruption from either lipreading or communicating in sign language. For example, research assistants were often unable to maintain eye contact with participants while signing because of the need to simultaneously point at the computer monitor to provide instructions related to gaze study components, such as the calibration process. In addition to developing ways to effectively provide instructions in American Sign Language, a practice exercise was included in the gaze tracker session to familiarize participants with the computer and technology. The use of the playback feature permitted a deeper dialogue between researchers and participants, which we found vital for understanding the experiences of deaf participants. ConclusionsOn the basis of our experience using the study protocol through a large research project, incorporating gaze-tracking technology offers beneficial avenues for better understanding how individuals interact with health information. Gaze tracking can determine the type and placement of visual content that attracts attention from the viewers of diverse backgrounds, including deaf individuals. The lessons learned through this study will help future researchers in determining ideal study designs, such as suitable protocols and participant characteristics (eg, deaf signers), while including gaze trackers in their projects. This approach explored how different ways of presenting health information can affect or enable visual learners to engage and use health information effectively. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)RR1-10.2196/26708https://www.researchprotocols.org/2021/9/e26708 |
| spellingShingle | Sara Champlin Jessica Cuculick Peter C Hauser Kelley Wyse Michael M McKee Using Gaze Tracking as a Research Tool in the Deaf Health Literacy and Access to Health Information Project: Protocol for a Multisite Mixed Methods Study and Preliminary Results JMIR Research Protocols |
| title | Using Gaze Tracking as a Research Tool in the Deaf Health Literacy and Access to Health Information Project: Protocol for a Multisite Mixed Methods Study and Preliminary Results |
| title_full | Using Gaze Tracking as a Research Tool in the Deaf Health Literacy and Access to Health Information Project: Protocol for a Multisite Mixed Methods Study and Preliminary Results |
| title_fullStr | Using Gaze Tracking as a Research Tool in the Deaf Health Literacy and Access to Health Information Project: Protocol for a Multisite Mixed Methods Study and Preliminary Results |
| title_full_unstemmed | Using Gaze Tracking as a Research Tool in the Deaf Health Literacy and Access to Health Information Project: Protocol for a Multisite Mixed Methods Study and Preliminary Results |
| title_short | Using Gaze Tracking as a Research Tool in the Deaf Health Literacy and Access to Health Information Project: Protocol for a Multisite Mixed Methods Study and Preliminary Results |
| title_sort | using gaze tracking as a research tool in the deaf health literacy and access to health information project protocol for a multisite mixed methods study and preliminary results |
| url | https://www.researchprotocols.org/2021/9/e26708 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sarachamplin usinggazetrackingasaresearchtoolinthedeafhealthliteracyandaccesstohealthinformationprojectprotocolforamultisitemixedmethodsstudyandpreliminaryresults AT jessicacuculick usinggazetrackingasaresearchtoolinthedeafhealthliteracyandaccesstohealthinformationprojectprotocolforamultisitemixedmethodsstudyandpreliminaryresults AT peterchauser usinggazetrackingasaresearchtoolinthedeafhealthliteracyandaccesstohealthinformationprojectprotocolforamultisitemixedmethodsstudyandpreliminaryresults AT kelleywyse usinggazetrackingasaresearchtoolinthedeafhealthliteracyandaccesstohealthinformationprojectprotocolforamultisitemixedmethodsstudyandpreliminaryresults AT michaelmmckee usinggazetrackingasaresearchtoolinthedeafhealthliteracyandaccesstohealthinformationprojectprotocolforamultisitemixedmethodsstudyandpreliminaryresults |