The Analysis of Mammalian Hearing Systems Supports the Hypothesis That Criticality Favors Neuronal Information Representation but Not Computation

In the neighborhood of critical states, distinct materials exhibit the same physical behavior, expressed by common simple laws among measurable observables, hence rendering a more detailed analysis of the individual systems obsolete. It is a widespread view that critical states are fundamental to ne...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ruedi Stoop, Florian Gomez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-04-01
Series:Entropy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/24/4/540
_version_ 1797434764178751488
author Ruedi Stoop
Florian Gomez
author_facet Ruedi Stoop
Florian Gomez
author_sort Ruedi Stoop
collection DOAJ
description In the neighborhood of critical states, distinct materials exhibit the same physical behavior, expressed by common simple laws among measurable observables, hence rendering a more detailed analysis of the individual systems obsolete. It is a widespread view that critical states are fundamental to neuroscience and directly favor computation. We argue here that from an evolutionary point of view, critical points seem indeed to be a natural phenomenon. Using mammalian hearing as our example, we show, however, explicitly that criticality does not describe the proper computational process and thus is only indirectly related to the computation in neural systems.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T10:37:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-81f0554e1d7442cc9fd2e7269edf653d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1099-4300
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T10:37:50Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Entropy
spelling doaj.art-81f0554e1d7442cc9fd2e7269edf653d2023-12-01T20:51:17ZengMDPI AGEntropy1099-43002022-04-0124454010.3390/e24040540The Analysis of Mammalian Hearing Systems Supports the Hypothesis That Criticality Favors Neuronal Information Representation but Not ComputationRuedi Stoop0Florian Gomez1Institute of Neuroinformatics, University and ETH Zürich, Irchel Campus, Winterthurerstr. 190, 8057 Zürich, SwitzerlandInstitute of Neuroinformatics, University and ETH Zürich, Irchel Campus, Winterthurerstr. 190, 8057 Zürich, SwitzerlandIn the neighborhood of critical states, distinct materials exhibit the same physical behavior, expressed by common simple laws among measurable observables, hence rendering a more detailed analysis of the individual systems obsolete. It is a widespread view that critical states are fundamental to neuroscience and directly favor computation. We argue here that from an evolutionary point of view, critical points seem indeed to be a natural phenomenon. Using mammalian hearing as our example, we show, however, explicitly that criticality does not describe the proper computational process and thus is only indirectly related to the computation in neural systems.https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/24/4/540criticalitycomputationhearinglistening
spellingShingle Ruedi Stoop
Florian Gomez
The Analysis of Mammalian Hearing Systems Supports the Hypothesis That Criticality Favors Neuronal Information Representation but Not Computation
Entropy
criticality
computation
hearing
listening
title The Analysis of Mammalian Hearing Systems Supports the Hypothesis That Criticality Favors Neuronal Information Representation but Not Computation
title_full The Analysis of Mammalian Hearing Systems Supports the Hypothesis That Criticality Favors Neuronal Information Representation but Not Computation
title_fullStr The Analysis of Mammalian Hearing Systems Supports the Hypothesis That Criticality Favors Neuronal Information Representation but Not Computation
title_full_unstemmed The Analysis of Mammalian Hearing Systems Supports the Hypothesis That Criticality Favors Neuronal Information Representation but Not Computation
title_short The Analysis of Mammalian Hearing Systems Supports the Hypothesis That Criticality Favors Neuronal Information Representation but Not Computation
title_sort analysis of mammalian hearing systems supports the hypothesis that criticality favors neuronal information representation but not computation
topic criticality
computation
hearing
listening
url https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/24/4/540
work_keys_str_mv AT ruedistoop theanalysisofmammalianhearingsystemssupportsthehypothesisthatcriticalityfavorsneuronalinformationrepresentationbutnotcomputation
AT floriangomez theanalysisofmammalianhearingsystemssupportsthehypothesisthatcriticalityfavorsneuronalinformationrepresentationbutnotcomputation
AT ruedistoop analysisofmammalianhearingsystemssupportsthehypothesisthatcriticalityfavorsneuronalinformationrepresentationbutnotcomputation
AT floriangomez analysisofmammalianhearingsystemssupportsthehypothesisthatcriticalityfavorsneuronalinformationrepresentationbutnotcomputation