Rapid Genomic Testing in Intensive Care: Health Professionals’ Perspectives on Ethical Challenges

Ultra-rapid genomic sequencing (urGS) is increasingly used in neonatal and pediatric intensive care settings (NICU/PICU), demonstrating high diagnostic and clinical utility. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of healthcare professionals (HPs) and the challenges raised by urGS, particularly...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katie Arkell, Christopher Gyngell, Zornitza Stark, Danya F. Vears
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-05-01
Series:Children
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/10/5/824
_version_ 1797600651443699712
author Katie Arkell
Christopher Gyngell
Zornitza Stark
Danya F. Vears
author_facet Katie Arkell
Christopher Gyngell
Zornitza Stark
Danya F. Vears
author_sort Katie Arkell
collection DOAJ
description Ultra-rapid genomic sequencing (urGS) is increasingly used in neonatal and pediatric intensive care settings (NICU/PICU), demonstrating high diagnostic and clinical utility. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of healthcare professionals (HPs) and the challenges raised by urGS, particularly when making treatment decisions. Four focus groups and two interviews were conducted with HPs who had experience using urGS in NICU/PICU. Inductive content analysis was used to analyze the data. Nineteen HPs participated overall (eight clinical geneticists, nine genetic counselors, and two intensivists). One challenging area of practice identified by HPs was setting realistic expectations for outcomes of urGS among HPs and families. HPs reported modifying pre-test counseling to include life-limiting diagnoses as a possible test outcome and felt concerned about the timing of the test and its impact on parent–child bonding. UrGS results of uncertain prognostic significance posed considerable challenges. Moral distress arose when families and HPs were misaligned regarding treatment goals following the urGS diagnosis. We identified areas of practice that remain ethically challenging for HPs using urGS in the NICU/PICU. HPs experiences of using urGS in the NICU/PICU could inform specialized training in withdrawal of treatment decision making for the genomics workforce.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T03:50:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-81f86040a7884abea91015bc5150c2cf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-9067
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T03:50:51Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Children
spelling doaj.art-81f86040a7884abea91015bc5150c2cf2023-11-18T00:55:26ZengMDPI AGChildren2227-90672023-05-0110582410.3390/children10050824Rapid Genomic Testing in Intensive Care: Health Professionals’ Perspectives on Ethical ChallengesKatie Arkell0Christopher Gyngell1Zornitza Stark2Danya F. Vears3Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, AustraliaBiomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, AustraliaBiomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, AustraliaUltra-rapid genomic sequencing (urGS) is increasingly used in neonatal and pediatric intensive care settings (NICU/PICU), demonstrating high diagnostic and clinical utility. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of healthcare professionals (HPs) and the challenges raised by urGS, particularly when making treatment decisions. Four focus groups and two interviews were conducted with HPs who had experience using urGS in NICU/PICU. Inductive content analysis was used to analyze the data. Nineteen HPs participated overall (eight clinical geneticists, nine genetic counselors, and two intensivists). One challenging area of practice identified by HPs was setting realistic expectations for outcomes of urGS among HPs and families. HPs reported modifying pre-test counseling to include life-limiting diagnoses as a possible test outcome and felt concerned about the timing of the test and its impact on parent–child bonding. UrGS results of uncertain prognostic significance posed considerable challenges. Moral distress arose when families and HPs were misaligned regarding treatment goals following the urGS diagnosis. We identified areas of practice that remain ethically challenging for HPs using urGS in the NICU/PICU. HPs experiences of using urGS in the NICU/PICU could inform specialized training in withdrawal of treatment decision making for the genomics workforce.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/10/5/824bioethicsgenomic sequencingNICUPICUconsentgenetic counseling
spellingShingle Katie Arkell
Christopher Gyngell
Zornitza Stark
Danya F. Vears
Rapid Genomic Testing in Intensive Care: Health Professionals’ Perspectives on Ethical Challenges
Children
bioethics
genomic sequencing
NICU
PICU
consent
genetic counseling
title Rapid Genomic Testing in Intensive Care: Health Professionals’ Perspectives on Ethical Challenges
title_full Rapid Genomic Testing in Intensive Care: Health Professionals’ Perspectives on Ethical Challenges
title_fullStr Rapid Genomic Testing in Intensive Care: Health Professionals’ Perspectives on Ethical Challenges
title_full_unstemmed Rapid Genomic Testing in Intensive Care: Health Professionals’ Perspectives on Ethical Challenges
title_short Rapid Genomic Testing in Intensive Care: Health Professionals’ Perspectives on Ethical Challenges
title_sort rapid genomic testing in intensive care health professionals perspectives on ethical challenges
topic bioethics
genomic sequencing
NICU
PICU
consent
genetic counseling
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/10/5/824
work_keys_str_mv AT katiearkell rapidgenomictestinginintensivecarehealthprofessionalsperspectivesonethicalchallenges
AT christophergyngell rapidgenomictestinginintensivecarehealthprofessionalsperspectivesonethicalchallenges
AT zornitzastark rapidgenomictestinginintensivecarehealthprofessionalsperspectivesonethicalchallenges
AT danyafvears rapidgenomictestinginintensivecarehealthprofessionalsperspectivesonethicalchallenges