Exploring Individual Differences in Recognizing Idiomatic Expressions in Context

Written language comprehension requires readers to integrate incoming information with stored mental knowledge to construct meaning. Literally plausible idiomatic expressions can activate both figurative and literal interpretations, which convey different meanings. Previous research has shown that c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mesian Tilmatine, Ferdy Hubers, Florian Hintz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2021-08-01
Series:Journal of Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/183
_version_ 1819133693265969152
author Mesian Tilmatine
Ferdy Hubers
Florian Hintz
author_facet Mesian Tilmatine
Ferdy Hubers
Florian Hintz
author_sort Mesian Tilmatine
collection DOAJ
description Written language comprehension requires readers to integrate incoming information with stored mental knowledge to construct meaning. Literally plausible idiomatic expressions can activate both figurative and literal interpretations, which convey different meanings. Previous research has shown that contexts biasing the figurative or literal interpretation of an idiom can facilitate its processing. Moreover, there is evidence that processing of idiomatic expressions is subject to individual differences in linguistic knowledge and cognitive-linguistic skills. It is therefore conceivable that individuals vary in the extent to which they experience context-induced facilitation in processing idiomatic expressions. To explore the interplay between reader-related variables and contextual facilitation, we conducted a self-paced reading experiment. We recruited participants who had recently completed a battery of 33 behavioural tests measuring individual differences in linguistic knowledge, general cognitive skills and linguistic processing skills. In the present experiment, a subset of these participants read idiomatic expressions that were either presented in isolation or preceded by a figuratively or literally biasing context. We conducted analyses on the reading times of idiom-final nouns and the word thereafter (spill-over region) across the three conditions, including participants’ scores from the individual differences battery. Our results showed no main effect of the preceding context, but substantial variation between readers and variation in contextual facilitation. We encourage interested researchers to exploit the present dataset for follow-up studies on individual differences in idiom processing.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T09:51:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-81ff0b4f33204d6faf8268f28f49d85b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2514-4820
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T09:51:21Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Cognition
spelling doaj.art-81ff0b4f33204d6faf8268f28f49d85b2022-12-21T18:30:22ZengUbiquity PressJournal of Cognition2514-48202021-08-014110.5334/joc.183187Exploring Individual Differences in Recognizing Idiomatic Expressions in ContextMesian Tilmatine0Ferdy Hubers1Florian Hintz2Free University Berlin, Berlin, DE; Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, NijmegenCentre for Language Studies, Radboud University, NijmegenMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, NijmegenWritten language comprehension requires readers to integrate incoming information with stored mental knowledge to construct meaning. Literally plausible idiomatic expressions can activate both figurative and literal interpretations, which convey different meanings. Previous research has shown that contexts biasing the figurative or literal interpretation of an idiom can facilitate its processing. Moreover, there is evidence that processing of idiomatic expressions is subject to individual differences in linguistic knowledge and cognitive-linguistic skills. It is therefore conceivable that individuals vary in the extent to which they experience context-induced facilitation in processing idiomatic expressions. To explore the interplay between reader-related variables and contextual facilitation, we conducted a self-paced reading experiment. We recruited participants who had recently completed a battery of 33 behavioural tests measuring individual differences in linguistic knowledge, general cognitive skills and linguistic processing skills. In the present experiment, a subset of these participants read idiomatic expressions that were either presented in isolation or preceded by a figuratively or literally biasing context. We conducted analyses on the reading times of idiom-final nouns and the word thereafter (spill-over region) across the three conditions, including participants’ scores from the individual differences battery. Our results showed no main effect of the preceding context, but substantial variation between readers and variation in contextual facilitation. We encourage interested researchers to exploit the present dataset for follow-up studies on individual differences in idiom processing.https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/183idiomatic expressionsindividual differencesself-paced reading
spellingShingle Mesian Tilmatine
Ferdy Hubers
Florian Hintz
Exploring Individual Differences in Recognizing Idiomatic Expressions in Context
Journal of Cognition
idiomatic expressions
individual differences
self-paced reading
title Exploring Individual Differences in Recognizing Idiomatic Expressions in Context
title_full Exploring Individual Differences in Recognizing Idiomatic Expressions in Context
title_fullStr Exploring Individual Differences in Recognizing Idiomatic Expressions in Context
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Individual Differences in Recognizing Idiomatic Expressions in Context
title_short Exploring Individual Differences in Recognizing Idiomatic Expressions in Context
title_sort exploring individual differences in recognizing idiomatic expressions in context
topic idiomatic expressions
individual differences
self-paced reading
url https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/183
work_keys_str_mv AT mesiantilmatine exploringindividualdifferencesinrecognizingidiomaticexpressionsincontext
AT ferdyhubers exploringindividualdifferencesinrecognizingidiomaticexpressionsincontext
AT florianhintz exploringindividualdifferencesinrecognizingidiomaticexpressionsincontext