A Comparative Study of the Solubility and Sorption Properties of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer and a Bioactive Liner
Background and Aim: This study aimed to compare the sorption and solubility properties of ACTIVA BioACTIVE liner and resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI). Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, a total of 30 samples were fabricated from each liner measuring 15 mm in diameter and 1 mm in...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Islamic Azad University
2022-07-01
|
Series: | Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-373-en.html |
_version_ | 1811288304179478528 |
---|---|
author | H Heshmat M hoorizad ganjkar N Sanaei SF Tabatabaei MJ Kharazifard |
author_facet | H Heshmat M hoorizad ganjkar N Sanaei SF Tabatabaei MJ Kharazifard |
author_sort | H Heshmat |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background and Aim: This study aimed to compare the sorption and solubility properties of ACTIVA BioACTIVE liner and resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI).
Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, a total of 30 samples were fabricated from each liner measuring 15 mm in diameter and 1 mm in thickness according to ISO 2009:4049. They were then divided into 6 subgroups (n=5) to assess their water solubility after 1 week and 8 weeks, water sorption after 1 week and 8 weeks, and acid solubility after 1 week and 8 weeks. The samples were then weighed, and placed in vials containing artificial saliva or lactic acid and incubated at 37°C for 1 week or 8 weeks according to specimen grouping. Afterwards, each specimen was weighed again. Sorption and solubility were calculated according to difference in weight of the samples. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA(alpha=0.05).
Results: RMGI showed greater water solubility and sorption compared with ACTIVA BioACTIVE liner after 1 week of storage (P=0.00). No significant difference was found in water solubility (P=0.64) and sorption (P=0.15) after 8 weeks of storage. There was no significant difference in acid solubility of RMGI and ACTIVA BioACTIVE liner after 1 week (P=0.30) or 8 weeks of storage (P=0.60)
Conclusion: Water sorption and solubility of RMGI were greater than those of ACTIVA BioACTIVE within the first week after setting but they were similar in long-term assessment. RMGI and ACTIVA BioACTIVE were not different in terms of acid resistance. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-13T03:33:53Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-820c7ab6f6924169b2d9a70e210d5a15 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2383-2754 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-13T03:33:53Z |
publishDate | 2022-07-01 |
publisher | Islamic Azad University |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences |
spelling | doaj.art-820c7ab6f6924169b2d9a70e210d5a152022-12-22T03:04:22ZengIslamic Azad UniversityJournal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences2383-27542022-07-0173125132A Comparative Study of the Solubility and Sorption Properties of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer and a Bioactive LinerH Heshmat0M hoorizad ganjkar1N Sanaei2SF Tabatabaei3MJ Kharazifard4 Dental Material Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran Private Dentistry office, Tehran, Iran Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran Dental Research Center, Dental Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Background and Aim: This study aimed to compare the sorption and solubility properties of ACTIVA BioACTIVE liner and resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI). Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, a total of 30 samples were fabricated from each liner measuring 15 mm in diameter and 1 mm in thickness according to ISO 2009:4049. They were then divided into 6 subgroups (n=5) to assess their water solubility after 1 week and 8 weeks, water sorption after 1 week and 8 weeks, and acid solubility after 1 week and 8 weeks. The samples were then weighed, and placed in vials containing artificial saliva or lactic acid and incubated at 37°C for 1 week or 8 weeks according to specimen grouping. Afterwards, each specimen was weighed again. Sorption and solubility were calculated according to difference in weight of the samples. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA(alpha=0.05). Results: RMGI showed greater water solubility and sorption compared with ACTIVA BioACTIVE liner after 1 week of storage (P=0.00). No significant difference was found in water solubility (P=0.64) and sorption (P=0.15) after 8 weeks of storage. There was no significant difference in acid solubility of RMGI and ACTIVA BioACTIVE liner after 1 week (P=0.30) or 8 weeks of storage (P=0.60) Conclusion: Water sorption and solubility of RMGI were greater than those of ACTIVA BioACTIVE within the first week after setting but they were similar in long-term assessment. RMGI and ACTIVA BioACTIVE were not different in terms of acid resistance.http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-373-en.htmladsorptionpulp capping and pulpectomy agentssolubility |
spellingShingle | H Heshmat M hoorizad ganjkar N Sanaei SF Tabatabaei MJ Kharazifard A Comparative Study of the Solubility and Sorption Properties of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer and a Bioactive Liner Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences adsorption pulp capping and pulpectomy agents solubility |
title | A Comparative Study of the Solubility and Sorption Properties of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer and a Bioactive Liner |
title_full | A Comparative Study of the Solubility and Sorption Properties of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer and a Bioactive Liner |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Study of the Solubility and Sorption Properties of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer and a Bioactive Liner |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study of the Solubility and Sorption Properties of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer and a Bioactive Liner |
title_short | A Comparative Study of the Solubility and Sorption Properties of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer and a Bioactive Liner |
title_sort | comparative study of the solubility and sorption properties of resin modified glass ionomer and a bioactive liner |
topic | adsorption pulp capping and pulpectomy agents solubility |
url | http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-373-en.html |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hheshmat acomparativestudyofthesolubilityandsorptionpropertiesofresinmodifiedglassionomerandabioactiveliner AT mhoorizadganjkar acomparativestudyofthesolubilityandsorptionpropertiesofresinmodifiedglassionomerandabioactiveliner AT nsanaei acomparativestudyofthesolubilityandsorptionpropertiesofresinmodifiedglassionomerandabioactiveliner AT sftabatabaei acomparativestudyofthesolubilityandsorptionpropertiesofresinmodifiedglassionomerandabioactiveliner AT mjkharazifard acomparativestudyofthesolubilityandsorptionpropertiesofresinmodifiedglassionomerandabioactiveliner AT hheshmat comparativestudyofthesolubilityandsorptionpropertiesofresinmodifiedglassionomerandabioactiveliner AT mhoorizadganjkar comparativestudyofthesolubilityandsorptionpropertiesofresinmodifiedglassionomerandabioactiveliner AT nsanaei comparativestudyofthesolubilityandsorptionpropertiesofresinmodifiedglassionomerandabioactiveliner AT sftabatabaei comparativestudyofthesolubilityandsorptionpropertiesofresinmodifiedglassionomerandabioactiveliner AT mjkharazifard comparativestudyofthesolubilityandsorptionpropertiesofresinmodifiedglassionomerandabioactiveliner |