Divergent strategies in cranial biomechanics and feeding ecology of the ankylosaurian dinosaurs

Abstract Ankylosaurs were important megaherbivores of Jurassic and Cretaceous ecosystems. Their distinctive craniodental anatomy and mechanics differentiated them from coexisting hadrosaurs and ceratopsians, and morphological evidence suggests dietary niche partitioning between sympatric ankylosauri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antonio Ballell, Bohao Mai, Michael J. Benton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-10-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45444-1
_version_ 1797452921934184448
author Antonio Ballell
Bohao Mai
Michael J. Benton
author_facet Antonio Ballell
Bohao Mai
Michael J. Benton
author_sort Antonio Ballell
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Ankylosaurs were important megaherbivores of Jurassic and Cretaceous ecosystems. Their distinctive craniodental anatomy and mechanics differentiated them from coexisting hadrosaurs and ceratopsians, and morphological evidence suggests dietary niche partitioning between sympatric ankylosaurids and nodosaurids. Here, we investigate the skull biomechanics of ankylosaurs relative to feeding function. First, we compare feeding functional performance between nodosaurids and ankylosaurids applying finite element analysis and lever mechanics to the skulls of Panoplosaurus mirus (Nodosauridae) and Euoplocephalus tutus (Ankylosauridae). We also compare jaw performance across a wider sample of ankylosaurs through lever mechanics and phylogenetic comparative methods. Mandibular stress levels are higher in Euoplocephalus, supporting the view that Panoplosaurus consumed tougher foodstuffs. Bite force and mechanical advantage (MA) estimates indicate that Panoplosaurus had a relatively more forceful and efficient bite than Euoplocephalus. There is little support for a role of the secondary palate in resisting feeding loads in the two ankylosaur clades. Several ankylosaurs converged on similar jaw mechanics, while some nodosaurids specialised towards high MA and some ankylosaurids evolved low MA jaws. Our study supports the hypothesis that ankylosaurs partitioned dietary niches in Late Cretaceous ecosystems and reveals that the two main ankylosaur clades evolved divergent evolutionary pathways in skull biomechanics and feeding habits.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T15:15:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-820db847f93a4f388c5d5bab7ff9acaa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T15:15:39Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-820db847f93a4f388c5d5bab7ff9acaa2023-11-26T13:05:24ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222023-10-0113111910.1038/s41598-023-45444-1Divergent strategies in cranial biomechanics and feeding ecology of the ankylosaurian dinosaursAntonio Ballell0Bohao Mai1Michael J. Benton2Bristol Palaeobiology Group, School of Earth Sciences, Life Sciences Building, University of BristolBristol Palaeobiology Group, School of Earth Sciences, Life Sciences Building, University of BristolBristol Palaeobiology Group, School of Earth Sciences, Life Sciences Building, University of BristolAbstract Ankylosaurs were important megaherbivores of Jurassic and Cretaceous ecosystems. Their distinctive craniodental anatomy and mechanics differentiated them from coexisting hadrosaurs and ceratopsians, and morphological evidence suggests dietary niche partitioning between sympatric ankylosaurids and nodosaurids. Here, we investigate the skull biomechanics of ankylosaurs relative to feeding function. First, we compare feeding functional performance between nodosaurids and ankylosaurids applying finite element analysis and lever mechanics to the skulls of Panoplosaurus mirus (Nodosauridae) and Euoplocephalus tutus (Ankylosauridae). We also compare jaw performance across a wider sample of ankylosaurs through lever mechanics and phylogenetic comparative methods. Mandibular stress levels are higher in Euoplocephalus, supporting the view that Panoplosaurus consumed tougher foodstuffs. Bite force and mechanical advantage (MA) estimates indicate that Panoplosaurus had a relatively more forceful and efficient bite than Euoplocephalus. There is little support for a role of the secondary palate in resisting feeding loads in the two ankylosaur clades. Several ankylosaurs converged on similar jaw mechanics, while some nodosaurids specialised towards high MA and some ankylosaurids evolved low MA jaws. Our study supports the hypothesis that ankylosaurs partitioned dietary niches in Late Cretaceous ecosystems and reveals that the two main ankylosaur clades evolved divergent evolutionary pathways in skull biomechanics and feeding habits.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45444-1
spellingShingle Antonio Ballell
Bohao Mai
Michael J. Benton
Divergent strategies in cranial biomechanics and feeding ecology of the ankylosaurian dinosaurs
Scientific Reports
title Divergent strategies in cranial biomechanics and feeding ecology of the ankylosaurian dinosaurs
title_full Divergent strategies in cranial biomechanics and feeding ecology of the ankylosaurian dinosaurs
title_fullStr Divergent strategies in cranial biomechanics and feeding ecology of the ankylosaurian dinosaurs
title_full_unstemmed Divergent strategies in cranial biomechanics and feeding ecology of the ankylosaurian dinosaurs
title_short Divergent strategies in cranial biomechanics and feeding ecology of the ankylosaurian dinosaurs
title_sort divergent strategies in cranial biomechanics and feeding ecology of the ankylosaurian dinosaurs
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45444-1
work_keys_str_mv AT antonioballell divergentstrategiesincranialbiomechanicsandfeedingecologyoftheankylosauriandinosaurs
AT bohaomai divergentstrategiesincranialbiomechanicsandfeedingecologyoftheankylosauriandinosaurs
AT michaeljbenton divergentstrategiesincranialbiomechanicsandfeedingecologyoftheankylosauriandinosaurs