The Influence of Delivery Vectors on HIV Vaccine Efficacy

Development of an effective HIV/AIDS vaccine remains a big challenge, largely due to the enormous HIV diversity which propels immune escape. Thus novel vaccine strategies are targeting multiple variants of conserved antibody and T cell epitopic regions which would incur a huge fitness cost to the vi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Beatrice Omusiro Ondondo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00439/full
_version_ 1818247735792369664
author Beatrice Omusiro Ondondo
author_facet Beatrice Omusiro Ondondo
author_sort Beatrice Omusiro Ondondo
collection DOAJ
description Development of an effective HIV/AIDS vaccine remains a big challenge, largely due to the enormous HIV diversity which propels immune escape. Thus novel vaccine strategies are targeting multiple variants of conserved antibody and T cell epitopic regions which would incur a huge fitness cost to the virus in the event of mutational escape. Besides immunogen design, the delivery modality is critical for vaccine potency and efficacy, and should be carefully selected in order to not only maximise transgene expression, but to also enhance the immuno-stimulatory potential to activate innate and adaptive immune systems. To date, five HIV vaccine candidates have been evaluated for efficacy and protection from acquisition was only achieved in a small proportion of vaccinees in the RV144 study which used a canarypox vector for delivery. Conversely, in the STEP study (HVTN 502) where human adenovirus serotype 5 (Ad5) was used, strong immune responses were induced but vaccination was more associated with increased risk of HIV acquisition than protection in vaccinees with pre-existing Ad5 immunity. The possibility that pre-existing immunity to a highly promising delivery vector may alter the natural course of HIV to increase acquisition risk is quite worrisome and a huge setback for HIV vaccine development. Thus, HIV vaccine development efforts are now geared towards delivery platforms which attain superior immunogenicity while concurrently limiting potential catastrophic effects likely to arise from pre-existing immunity or vector-related immuno-modulation. However, it still remains unclear whether it is poor immunogenicity of HIV antigens or substandard immunological potency of the safer delivery vectors that has limited the success of HIV vaccines. This article discusses some of the promising delivery vectors to be harnessed for improved HIV vaccine efficacy.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T15:09:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8235ac49936c4c638b551b3b1ffaad2f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-302X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T15:09:26Z
publishDate 2014-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Microbiology
spelling doaj.art-8235ac49936c4c638b551b3b1ffaad2f2022-12-22T00:20:39ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2014-08-01510.3389/fmicb.2014.00439108071The Influence of Delivery Vectors on HIV Vaccine EfficacyBeatrice Omusiro Ondondo0Oxford UniversityDevelopment of an effective HIV/AIDS vaccine remains a big challenge, largely due to the enormous HIV diversity which propels immune escape. Thus novel vaccine strategies are targeting multiple variants of conserved antibody and T cell epitopic regions which would incur a huge fitness cost to the virus in the event of mutational escape. Besides immunogen design, the delivery modality is critical for vaccine potency and efficacy, and should be carefully selected in order to not only maximise transgene expression, but to also enhance the immuno-stimulatory potential to activate innate and adaptive immune systems. To date, five HIV vaccine candidates have been evaluated for efficacy and protection from acquisition was only achieved in a small proportion of vaccinees in the RV144 study which used a canarypox vector for delivery. Conversely, in the STEP study (HVTN 502) where human adenovirus serotype 5 (Ad5) was used, strong immune responses were induced but vaccination was more associated with increased risk of HIV acquisition than protection in vaccinees with pre-existing Ad5 immunity. The possibility that pre-existing immunity to a highly promising delivery vector may alter the natural course of HIV to increase acquisition risk is quite worrisome and a huge setback for HIV vaccine development. Thus, HIV vaccine development efforts are now geared towards delivery platforms which attain superior immunogenicity while concurrently limiting potential catastrophic effects likely to arise from pre-existing immunity or vector-related immuno-modulation. However, it still remains unclear whether it is poor immunogenicity of HIV antigens or substandard immunological potency of the safer delivery vectors that has limited the success of HIV vaccines. This article discusses some of the promising delivery vectors to be harnessed for improved HIV vaccine efficacy.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00439/fullDNAVaccinesadenovirusHIV -1Delivery vectorsMVA
spellingShingle Beatrice Omusiro Ondondo
The Influence of Delivery Vectors on HIV Vaccine Efficacy
Frontiers in Microbiology
DNA
Vaccines
adenovirus
HIV -1
Delivery vectors
MVA
title The Influence of Delivery Vectors on HIV Vaccine Efficacy
title_full The Influence of Delivery Vectors on HIV Vaccine Efficacy
title_fullStr The Influence of Delivery Vectors on HIV Vaccine Efficacy
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Delivery Vectors on HIV Vaccine Efficacy
title_short The Influence of Delivery Vectors on HIV Vaccine Efficacy
title_sort influence of delivery vectors on hiv vaccine efficacy
topic DNA
Vaccines
adenovirus
HIV -1
Delivery vectors
MVA
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00439/full
work_keys_str_mv AT beatriceomusiroondondo theinfluenceofdeliveryvectorsonhivvaccineefficacy
AT beatriceomusiroondondo influenceofdeliveryvectorsonhivvaccineefficacy