A new formula for selecting the size of cuffed endotracheal tubes in pediatric patients

Background: Choosing an appropriate endotracheal tube size during the first attempt is crucial for avoiding unnecessary reintubation. Previous studies on endotracheal tube size in children focused on uncuffed tubes. Following recent studies on pediatric airway anatomy, cuffed endotracheal tubes are...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ji Yeon Kwon, Ki Hwa Lee, Sang Eun Lee, Yong Han Kim, Sung Hyun Shin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-01-01
Series:Bali Journal of Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.bjoaonline.com/article.asp?issn=2549-2276;year=2023;volume=7;issue=3;spage=141;epage=144;aulast=Kwon
_version_ 1827783406557069312
author Ji Yeon Kwon
Ki Hwa Lee
Sang Eun Lee
Yong Han Kim
Sung Hyun Shin
author_facet Ji Yeon Kwon
Ki Hwa Lee
Sang Eun Lee
Yong Han Kim
Sung Hyun Shin
author_sort Ji Yeon Kwon
collection DOAJ
description Background: Choosing an appropriate endotracheal tube size during the first attempt is crucial for avoiding unnecessary reintubation. Previous studies on endotracheal tube size in children focused on uncuffed tubes. Following recent studies on pediatric airway anatomy, cuffed endotracheal tubes are increasingly utilized in children. The objective of our study was to develop a new formula for selecting the correctly sized cuffed endotracheal tube for pediatric patients. Materials and Methods: We examined the electronic anesthetic records of 465 pediatric patients who received elective ophthalmic surgery between January 2011 and December 2018. Multiple linear regression was used to identify potential predictors of cuffed endotracheal size among age, weight, height, body mass index, and the presence of underweight, overweight, and obesity. We used repeated-measures ANOVA to assess the difference between the actual and calculated sizes of the endotracheal tube. Results: The derived formula is as follows: Predicted endotracheal tube size (mm) = 3.7 + 0.1 × age (years) + 0.02 × weight (kg) + 0.1 × presence of overweight (0: negative, 1: positive). The coefficient of determination (R2) for the total population was 0.685 and was higher in the overweight group (R2 = 0.763). When compared with the three conventional age-based formulas (Cole’s, Khine’s, and Duracher’s formula), the difference between the actual endotracheal tube size and the endotracheal tube size calculated using Duracher’s formula was the smallest. Conclusions: In choosing the appropriate size of a cuffed endotracheal tube in children, age and body size should be considered.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T15:47:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8237ffbcdbc94ad099d9883ac505fb5f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2549-2276
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T15:47:10Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Bali Journal of Anesthesiology
spelling doaj.art-8237ffbcdbc94ad099d9883ac505fb5f2023-10-26T06:05:07ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsBali Journal of Anesthesiology2549-22762023-01-017314114410.4103/bjoa.bjoa_118_23A new formula for selecting the size of cuffed endotracheal tubes in pediatric patientsJi Yeon KwonKi Hwa LeeSang Eun LeeYong Han KimSung Hyun ShinBackground: Choosing an appropriate endotracheal tube size during the first attempt is crucial for avoiding unnecessary reintubation. Previous studies on endotracheal tube size in children focused on uncuffed tubes. Following recent studies on pediatric airway anatomy, cuffed endotracheal tubes are increasingly utilized in children. The objective of our study was to develop a new formula for selecting the correctly sized cuffed endotracheal tube for pediatric patients. Materials and Methods: We examined the electronic anesthetic records of 465 pediatric patients who received elective ophthalmic surgery between January 2011 and December 2018. Multiple linear regression was used to identify potential predictors of cuffed endotracheal size among age, weight, height, body mass index, and the presence of underweight, overweight, and obesity. We used repeated-measures ANOVA to assess the difference between the actual and calculated sizes of the endotracheal tube. Results: The derived formula is as follows: Predicted endotracheal tube size (mm) = 3.7 + 0.1 × age (years) + 0.02 × weight (kg) + 0.1 × presence of overweight (0: negative, 1: positive). The coefficient of determination (R2) for the total population was 0.685 and was higher in the overweight group (R2 = 0.763). When compared with the three conventional age-based formulas (Cole’s, Khine’s, and Duracher’s formula), the difference between the actual endotracheal tube size and the endotracheal tube size calculated using Duracher’s formula was the smallest. Conclusions: In choosing the appropriate size of a cuffed endotracheal tube in children, age and body size should be considered.http://www.bjoaonline.com/article.asp?issn=2549-2276;year=2023;volume=7;issue=3;spage=141;epage=144;aulast=Kwonbody weightendotracheal intubationoverweightpediatrics
spellingShingle Ji Yeon Kwon
Ki Hwa Lee
Sang Eun Lee
Yong Han Kim
Sung Hyun Shin
A new formula for selecting the size of cuffed endotracheal tubes in pediatric patients
Bali Journal of Anesthesiology
body weight
endotracheal intubation
overweight
pediatrics
title A new formula for selecting the size of cuffed endotracheal tubes in pediatric patients
title_full A new formula for selecting the size of cuffed endotracheal tubes in pediatric patients
title_fullStr A new formula for selecting the size of cuffed endotracheal tubes in pediatric patients
title_full_unstemmed A new formula for selecting the size of cuffed endotracheal tubes in pediatric patients
title_short A new formula for selecting the size of cuffed endotracheal tubes in pediatric patients
title_sort new formula for selecting the size of cuffed endotracheal tubes in pediatric patients
topic body weight
endotracheal intubation
overweight
pediatrics
url http://www.bjoaonline.com/article.asp?issn=2549-2276;year=2023;volume=7;issue=3;spage=141;epage=144;aulast=Kwon
work_keys_str_mv AT jiyeonkwon anewformulaforselectingthesizeofcuffedendotrachealtubesinpediatricpatients
AT kihwalee anewformulaforselectingthesizeofcuffedendotrachealtubesinpediatricpatients
AT sangeunlee anewformulaforselectingthesizeofcuffedendotrachealtubesinpediatricpatients
AT yonghankim anewformulaforselectingthesizeofcuffedendotrachealtubesinpediatricpatients
AT sunghyunshin anewformulaforselectingthesizeofcuffedendotrachealtubesinpediatricpatients
AT jiyeonkwon newformulaforselectingthesizeofcuffedendotrachealtubesinpediatricpatients
AT kihwalee newformulaforselectingthesizeofcuffedendotrachealtubesinpediatricpatients
AT sangeunlee newformulaforselectingthesizeofcuffedendotrachealtubesinpediatricpatients
AT yonghankim newformulaforselectingthesizeofcuffedendotrachealtubesinpediatricpatients
AT sunghyunshin newformulaforselectingthesizeofcuffedendotrachealtubesinpediatricpatients