Efficacy of the EZ-IO<sup>® </sup>needle driver for out-of-hospital intraosseous access - a preliminary, observational, multicenter study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Intraosseous (IO) access represents a reliable alternative to intravenous vascular access and is explicitly recommended in the current guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council when intravenous access is difficult or impossibl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Latasch Leo, Zacharowski Kai, Lotz Gösta, Schweigkofler Uwe, Schalk Richard, Byhahn Christian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-10-01
Series:Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sjtrem.com/content/19/1/65
_version_ 1818527493132386304
author Latasch Leo
Zacharowski Kai
Lotz Gösta
Schweigkofler Uwe
Schalk Richard
Byhahn Christian
author_facet Latasch Leo
Zacharowski Kai
Lotz Gösta
Schweigkofler Uwe
Schalk Richard
Byhahn Christian
author_sort Latasch Leo
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Intraosseous (IO) access represents a reliable alternative to intravenous vascular access and is explicitly recommended in the current guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council when intravenous access is difficult or impossible. We therefore aimed to study the efficacy of the intraosseous needle driver EZ-IO<sup>® </sup>in the prehospital setting.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>During a 24-month period, all cases of prehospital IO access using the EZ-IO<sup>® </sup>needle driver within three operational areas of emergency medical services were prospectively recorded by a standardized questionnaire that needed to be filled out by the rescuer immediately after the mission and sent to the primary investigator. We determined the rate of successful insertion of the IO needle, the time required, immediate procedure-related complications, the level of previous experience with IO access, and operator's subjective satisfaction with the device.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>77 IO needle insertions were performed in 69 adults and five infants and children by emergency physicians (n = 72 applications) and paramedics (n = 5 applications). Needle placement was successful at the first attempt in all but 2 adults (one patient with unrecognized total knee arthroplasty, one case of needle obstruction after placement). The majority of users (92%) were relative novices with less than five previous IO needle placements. Of 22 responsive patients, 18 reported pain upon fluid administration via the needle. The rescuers' subjective rating regarding handling of the device and ease of needle insertion, as described by means of an analogue scale (0 = entirely unsatisfied, 10 = most satisfied), provided a median score of 10 (range 1-10).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The EZ-IO<sup>® </sup>needle driver was an efficient alternative to establish immediate out-of-hospital vascular access. However, significant pain upon intramedullary infusion was observed in the majority of responsive patients.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-11T06:36:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-823ac6fdaa894140be4ae5cd16902628
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1757-7241
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T06:36:49Z
publishDate 2011-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
spelling doaj.art-823ac6fdaa894140be4ae5cd169026282022-12-22T01:17:20ZengBMCScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine1757-72412011-10-011916510.1186/1757-7241-19-65Efficacy of the EZ-IO<sup>® </sup>needle driver for out-of-hospital intraosseous access - a preliminary, observational, multicenter studyLatasch LeoZacharowski KaiLotz GöstaSchweigkofler UweSchalk RichardByhahn Christian<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Intraosseous (IO) access represents a reliable alternative to intravenous vascular access and is explicitly recommended in the current guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council when intravenous access is difficult or impossible. We therefore aimed to study the efficacy of the intraosseous needle driver EZ-IO<sup>® </sup>in the prehospital setting.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>During a 24-month period, all cases of prehospital IO access using the EZ-IO<sup>® </sup>needle driver within three operational areas of emergency medical services were prospectively recorded by a standardized questionnaire that needed to be filled out by the rescuer immediately after the mission and sent to the primary investigator. We determined the rate of successful insertion of the IO needle, the time required, immediate procedure-related complications, the level of previous experience with IO access, and operator's subjective satisfaction with the device.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>77 IO needle insertions were performed in 69 adults and five infants and children by emergency physicians (n = 72 applications) and paramedics (n = 5 applications). Needle placement was successful at the first attempt in all but 2 adults (one patient with unrecognized total knee arthroplasty, one case of needle obstruction after placement). The majority of users (92%) were relative novices with less than five previous IO needle placements. Of 22 responsive patients, 18 reported pain upon fluid administration via the needle. The rescuers' subjective rating regarding handling of the device and ease of needle insertion, as described by means of an analogue scale (0 = entirely unsatisfied, 10 = most satisfied), provided a median score of 10 (range 1-10).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The EZ-IO<sup>® </sup>needle driver was an efficient alternative to establish immediate out-of-hospital vascular access. However, significant pain upon intramedullary infusion was observed in the majority of responsive patients.</p>http://www.sjtrem.com/content/19/1/65Intraosseous accessEZ-IO<sup>® </sup>needle driverEmergency medicine
spellingShingle Latasch Leo
Zacharowski Kai
Lotz Gösta
Schweigkofler Uwe
Schalk Richard
Byhahn Christian
Efficacy of the EZ-IO<sup>® </sup>needle driver for out-of-hospital intraosseous access - a preliminary, observational, multicenter study
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Intraosseous access
EZ-IO<sup>® </sup>needle driver
Emergency medicine
title Efficacy of the EZ-IO<sup>® </sup>needle driver for out-of-hospital intraosseous access - a preliminary, observational, multicenter study
title_full Efficacy of the EZ-IO<sup>® </sup>needle driver for out-of-hospital intraosseous access - a preliminary, observational, multicenter study
title_fullStr Efficacy of the EZ-IO<sup>® </sup>needle driver for out-of-hospital intraosseous access - a preliminary, observational, multicenter study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of the EZ-IO<sup>® </sup>needle driver for out-of-hospital intraosseous access - a preliminary, observational, multicenter study
title_short Efficacy of the EZ-IO<sup>® </sup>needle driver for out-of-hospital intraosseous access - a preliminary, observational, multicenter study
title_sort efficacy of the ez io sup r sup needle driver for out of hospital intraosseous access a preliminary observational multicenter study
topic Intraosseous access
EZ-IO<sup>® </sup>needle driver
Emergency medicine
url http://www.sjtrem.com/content/19/1/65
work_keys_str_mv AT lataschleo efficacyoftheeziosupsupneedledriverforoutofhospitalintraosseousaccessapreliminaryobservationalmulticenterstudy
AT zacharowskikai efficacyoftheeziosupsupneedledriverforoutofhospitalintraosseousaccessapreliminaryobservationalmulticenterstudy
AT lotzgosta efficacyoftheeziosupsupneedledriverforoutofhospitalintraosseousaccessapreliminaryobservationalmulticenterstudy
AT schweigkofleruwe efficacyoftheeziosupsupneedledriverforoutofhospitalintraosseousaccessapreliminaryobservationalmulticenterstudy
AT schalkrichard efficacyoftheeziosupsupneedledriverforoutofhospitalintraosseousaccessapreliminaryobservationalmulticenterstudy
AT byhahnchristian efficacyoftheeziosupsupneedledriverforoutofhospitalintraosseousaccessapreliminaryobservationalmulticenterstudy