Conceptualizing semantic transparency: A systematic analysis of semantic transparency measures in English compound words

Semantic transparency refers to the extent to which the meaning of a multimorphemic word can be determined from the meaning of its constituents. In terms of compounds, semantic transparency has been operationally defined in multiple ways, and research has sometimes produced conflicting results conce...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leah Auch, Christina L. Gagné, Thomas L. Spalding
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-12-01
Series:Methods in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260120300175
_version_ 1818875775850381312
author Leah Auch
Christina L. Gagné
Thomas L. Spalding
author_facet Leah Auch
Christina L. Gagné
Thomas L. Spalding
author_sort Leah Auch
collection DOAJ
description Semantic transparency refers to the extent to which the meaning of a multimorphemic word can be determined from the meaning of its constituents. In terms of compounds, semantic transparency has been operationally defined in multiple ways, and research has sometimes produced conflicting results concerning its effect on processing. This study explored a potential source of these experimental conflicts by examining the methodology and measures used to operationalize semantic transparency. First, we used factor analysis to investigate whether common measures of semantic transparency truly inform the same underlying construct and found that there were at least four factors represented by eleven common semantic transparency variables. After extracting predicted values from these factors, we found that different aspects of semantic transparency are not equally predictive of behavioural data from lexical decision and naming tasks. Moreover, the various aspects represented by the different measures appear to interact and influence each other when predicting this behavioural data. We conclude that different measures of semantic transparency reflect different constructs, and that this should be considered when investigating the effect of semantic transparency.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T13:31:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-823c4ead71354bc498b8a538aa833ca0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2590-2601
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T13:31:52Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Methods in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-823c4ead71354bc498b8a538aa833ca02022-12-21T20:19:21ZengElsevierMethods in Psychology2590-26012020-12-013100030Conceptualizing semantic transparency: A systematic analysis of semantic transparency measures in English compound wordsLeah Auch0Christina L. Gagné1Thomas L. Spalding2University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaCorresponding author. P-217 Biological Sciences Building, Department of Psychology, T6G 2E9, Canada.; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaSemantic transparency refers to the extent to which the meaning of a multimorphemic word can be determined from the meaning of its constituents. In terms of compounds, semantic transparency has been operationally defined in multiple ways, and research has sometimes produced conflicting results concerning its effect on processing. This study explored a potential source of these experimental conflicts by examining the methodology and measures used to operationalize semantic transparency. First, we used factor analysis to investigate whether common measures of semantic transparency truly inform the same underlying construct and found that there were at least four factors represented by eleven common semantic transparency variables. After extracting predicted values from these factors, we found that different aspects of semantic transparency are not equally predictive of behavioural data from lexical decision and naming tasks. Moreover, the various aspects represented by the different measures appear to interact and influence each other when predicting this behavioural data. We conclude that different measures of semantic transparency reflect different constructs, and that this should be considered when investigating the effect of semantic transparency.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260120300175Semantic transparencyCompound wordsFactor analysisPsycholinguisticsMorphologyCognitive psychology
spellingShingle Leah Auch
Christina L. Gagné
Thomas L. Spalding
Conceptualizing semantic transparency: A systematic analysis of semantic transparency measures in English compound words
Methods in Psychology
Semantic transparency
Compound words
Factor analysis
Psycholinguistics
Morphology
Cognitive psychology
title Conceptualizing semantic transparency: A systematic analysis of semantic transparency measures in English compound words
title_full Conceptualizing semantic transparency: A systematic analysis of semantic transparency measures in English compound words
title_fullStr Conceptualizing semantic transparency: A systematic analysis of semantic transparency measures in English compound words
title_full_unstemmed Conceptualizing semantic transparency: A systematic analysis of semantic transparency measures in English compound words
title_short Conceptualizing semantic transparency: A systematic analysis of semantic transparency measures in English compound words
title_sort conceptualizing semantic transparency a systematic analysis of semantic transparency measures in english compound words
topic Semantic transparency
Compound words
Factor analysis
Psycholinguistics
Morphology
Cognitive psychology
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260120300175
work_keys_str_mv AT leahauch conceptualizingsemantictransparencyasystematicanalysisofsemantictransparencymeasuresinenglishcompoundwords
AT christinalgagne conceptualizingsemantictransparencyasystematicanalysisofsemantictransparencymeasuresinenglishcompoundwords
AT thomaslspalding conceptualizingsemantictransparencyasystematicanalysisofsemantictransparencymeasuresinenglishcompoundwords