Early rhythm control vs. rate control in atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectiveIt has long been debated whether rhythm control vs. rate control strategies have differing effects on mortality and morbidity for atrial fibrillation (AF). Recently, several randomized controlled studies (RCTs) and observational trials described that an early rhythm management method was li...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shaojie Han, Ruikun Jia, Zhifu Cen, Ran Guo, Shenyu Zhao, Yixuan Bai, Min Xie, Kaijun Cui
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.978637/full
_version_ 1811170951560167424
author Shaojie Han
Ruikun Jia
Zhifu Cen
Ran Guo
Shenyu Zhao
Yixuan Bai
Min Xie
Kaijun Cui
author_facet Shaojie Han
Ruikun Jia
Zhifu Cen
Ran Guo
Shenyu Zhao
Yixuan Bai
Min Xie
Kaijun Cui
author_sort Shaojie Han
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveIt has long been debated whether rhythm control vs. rate control strategies have differing effects on mortality and morbidity for atrial fibrillation (AF). Recently, several randomized controlled studies (RCTs) and observational trials described that an early rhythm management method was linked to a lower likelihood of negative clinical outcomes in individuals with AF. We wanted to see if an early rhythm management method may help patients with AF.MethodsWe performed a systematic search to retrieve studies assessing the outcomes of early rhythm control vs. rate control in AF by using PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase published between 01/01/2000 and 15/04/2022.ResultsFinally, two RCTs, one retrospective analysis of RCTs, and four observational studies were identified. Compared with rate control, early rhythm control has been linked to lower all-cause mortality. [risk ratio (RR), 0.76; 95% CI 0.69–0.83; P < 0.00001; I2 = 77%]. The early rhythm control group was also associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR, 0.68; 95% CI 0.63–0.74; P < 0.00001; I2 = 33), stroke (RR, 0.77; 95% CI 0.67–0.87; P < 0.001; I2 = 64), and heart failure hospitalization (RR, 0.74; 95% CI 0.59–0.93; P = 0.0009; I2 = 93%). We found no significant difference in nights spent in hospital per year, acute coronary syndrome, major bleeding, and cardiac arrest/ventricular arrhythmia between the groups.ConclusionIn this meta-analysis, early rhythm therapy was linked to a lower risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, stroke, and heart failure hospitalization compared with the rate control group.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022333592.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T17:06:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-825828439a4249f7b2a8e5e10a41b88a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-055X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T17:06:20Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
spelling doaj.art-825828439a4249f7b2a8e5e10a41b88a2023-02-06T05:07:52ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2297-055X2023-02-011010.3389/fcvm.2023.978637978637Early rhythm control vs. rate control in atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysisShaojie Han0Ruikun Jia1Zhifu Cen2Ran Guo3Shenyu Zhao4Yixuan Bai5Min Xie6Kaijun Cui7Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, Chengdu Seventh People’s Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaObjectiveIt has long been debated whether rhythm control vs. rate control strategies have differing effects on mortality and morbidity for atrial fibrillation (AF). Recently, several randomized controlled studies (RCTs) and observational trials described that an early rhythm management method was linked to a lower likelihood of negative clinical outcomes in individuals with AF. We wanted to see if an early rhythm management method may help patients with AF.MethodsWe performed a systematic search to retrieve studies assessing the outcomes of early rhythm control vs. rate control in AF by using PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase published between 01/01/2000 and 15/04/2022.ResultsFinally, two RCTs, one retrospective analysis of RCTs, and four observational studies were identified. Compared with rate control, early rhythm control has been linked to lower all-cause mortality. [risk ratio (RR), 0.76; 95% CI 0.69–0.83; P < 0.00001; I2 = 77%]. The early rhythm control group was also associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR, 0.68; 95% CI 0.63–0.74; P < 0.00001; I2 = 33), stroke (RR, 0.77; 95% CI 0.67–0.87; P < 0.001; I2 = 64), and heart failure hospitalization (RR, 0.74; 95% CI 0.59–0.93; P = 0.0009; I2 = 93%). We found no significant difference in nights spent in hospital per year, acute coronary syndrome, major bleeding, and cardiac arrest/ventricular arrhythmia between the groups.ConclusionIn this meta-analysis, early rhythm therapy was linked to a lower risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, stroke, and heart failure hospitalization compared with the rate control group.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022333592.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.978637/fullatrial fibrillationearly rhythm controlrate controlmeta-analysiscardiovascular outcome
spellingShingle Shaojie Han
Ruikun Jia
Zhifu Cen
Ran Guo
Shenyu Zhao
Yixuan Bai
Min Xie
Kaijun Cui
Early rhythm control vs. rate control in atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
atrial fibrillation
early rhythm control
rate control
meta-analysis
cardiovascular outcome
title Early rhythm control vs. rate control in atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Early rhythm control vs. rate control in atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Early rhythm control vs. rate control in atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Early rhythm control vs. rate control in atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Early rhythm control vs. rate control in atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort early rhythm control vs rate control in atrial fibrillation a systematic review and meta analysis
topic atrial fibrillation
early rhythm control
rate control
meta-analysis
cardiovascular outcome
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.978637/full
work_keys_str_mv AT shaojiehan earlyrhythmcontrolvsratecontrolinatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ruikunjia earlyrhythmcontrolvsratecontrolinatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhifucen earlyrhythmcontrolvsratecontrolinatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ranguo earlyrhythmcontrolvsratecontrolinatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shenyuzhao earlyrhythmcontrolvsratecontrolinatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yixuanbai earlyrhythmcontrolvsratecontrolinatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT minxie earlyrhythmcontrolvsratecontrolinatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kaijuncui earlyrhythmcontrolvsratecontrolinatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis