The History of -<i>eer</i> in English: Suffix Competition or Symbiosis?
Ecological models of competition have provided great explanatory power regarding synonymy in derivational morphology. Competition models of this type have certainly shown their utility, as they have demonstrated, among other things, the relevance of frequency measures, productivity, compositionality...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2024-03-01
|
| Series: | Languages |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/9/3/102 |
| _version_ | 1797240280433295360 |
|---|---|
| author | Zachary Dukic Chris C. Palmer |
| author_facet | Zachary Dukic Chris C. Palmer |
| author_sort | Zachary Dukic |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Ecological models of competition have provided great explanatory power regarding synonymy in derivational morphology. Competition models of this type have certainly shown their utility, as they have demonstrated, among other things, the relevance of frequency measures, productivity, compositionality and analyzability when comparing the development of morphological constructions. There has been less consideration of alternative models that could be used to describe the historical co-development of suffixes that produce words with sometimes similar forms or meanings but are not inevitably or solely in competition. The symbiotic model proposed in this article may help answer larger questions in linguistics, such as how best to analyze certain multilingual morphological phenomena, including the emergence of semantically similar forms within the same language. The present study demonstrates the importance of a diachronic approach in situations of near-synonymy, as an understanding of semantic similarity necessitates a review of the available historical record. In particular, our study focuses on the case of the suffix -<i>eer</i> (e.g., <i>marketeer</i>) in English, analyzing its origins, semantics, compositionality, and historical development, including its symbiotic relationship to the similar suffix -<i>er</i> (e.g., <i>marketer</i>). |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T18:04:55Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-8258d9001e914b7abe91cc1820b9ad30 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2226-471X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T18:04:55Z |
| publishDate | 2024-03-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Languages |
| spelling | doaj.art-8258d9001e914b7abe91cc1820b9ad302024-03-27T13:50:59ZengMDPI AGLanguages2226-471X2024-03-019310210.3390/languages9030102The History of -<i>eer</i> in English: Suffix Competition or Symbiosis?Zachary Dukic0Chris C. Palmer1Department of English, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790-4240, USADepartment of English, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA 30144-5659, USAEcological models of competition have provided great explanatory power regarding synonymy in derivational morphology. Competition models of this type have certainly shown their utility, as they have demonstrated, among other things, the relevance of frequency measures, productivity, compositionality and analyzability when comparing the development of morphological constructions. There has been less consideration of alternative models that could be used to describe the historical co-development of suffixes that produce words with sometimes similar forms or meanings but are not inevitably or solely in competition. The symbiotic model proposed in this article may help answer larger questions in linguistics, such as how best to analyze certain multilingual morphological phenomena, including the emergence of semantically similar forms within the same language. The present study demonstrates the importance of a diachronic approach in situations of near-synonymy, as an understanding of semantic similarity necessitates a review of the available historical record. In particular, our study focuses on the case of the suffix -<i>eer</i> (e.g., <i>marketeer</i>) in English, analyzing its origins, semantics, compositionality, and historical development, including its symbiotic relationship to the similar suffix -<i>er</i> (e.g., <i>marketer</i>).https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/9/3/102competitionsymbiosissuffixderivativefrequencymorphology |
| spellingShingle | Zachary Dukic Chris C. Palmer The History of -<i>eer</i> in English: Suffix Competition or Symbiosis? Languages competition symbiosis suffix derivative frequency morphology |
| title | The History of -<i>eer</i> in English: Suffix Competition or Symbiosis? |
| title_full | The History of -<i>eer</i> in English: Suffix Competition or Symbiosis? |
| title_fullStr | The History of -<i>eer</i> in English: Suffix Competition or Symbiosis? |
| title_full_unstemmed | The History of -<i>eer</i> in English: Suffix Competition or Symbiosis? |
| title_short | The History of -<i>eer</i> in English: Suffix Competition or Symbiosis? |
| title_sort | history of i eer i in english suffix competition or symbiosis |
| topic | competition symbiosis suffix derivative frequency morphology |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/9/3/102 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT zacharydukic thehistoryofieeriinenglishsuffixcompetitionorsymbiosis AT chriscpalmer thehistoryofieeriinenglishsuffixcompetitionorsymbiosis AT zacharydukic historyofieeriinenglishsuffixcompetitionorsymbiosis AT chriscpalmer historyofieeriinenglishsuffixcompetitionorsymbiosis |