Comparison of Periprocedural and Intermediate-Term Outcomes of TAVI in Patients with Ejection Fraction ≤ 20% vs. Patients with 20% < EF ≤ 40%

Treatment of congestive heart failure (CHF) with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and severe aortic stenosis (AS) is challenging, yet transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a suitable treatment option in such patients. We compared the periprocedural outcomes of TAVR i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arber Kodra, Michael Cinelli, Renita Alexander, Rahming Hamfreth, Denny Wang, Shankar Thampi, Craig Basman, Chad Kliger, Jacob Scheinerman, Luigi Pirelli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-03-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/6/2390
_version_ 1797610957264912384
author Arber Kodra
Michael Cinelli
Renita Alexander
Rahming Hamfreth
Denny Wang
Shankar Thampi
Craig Basman
Chad Kliger
Jacob Scheinerman
Luigi Pirelli
author_facet Arber Kodra
Michael Cinelli
Renita Alexander
Rahming Hamfreth
Denny Wang
Shankar Thampi
Craig Basman
Chad Kliger
Jacob Scheinerman
Luigi Pirelli
author_sort Arber Kodra
collection DOAJ
description Treatment of congestive heart failure (CHF) with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and severe aortic stenosis (AS) is challenging, yet transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a suitable treatment option in such patients. We compared the periprocedural outcomes of TAVR in patients with an ejection fraction (EF) of ≤20% (VLEF group) to patients with an EF > 20% to ≤40% (LEF group). We included patients with severe AS and reduced LV ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 40%) who underwent TAVR at four centers within Northwell Health between January 2016 and December 2020. Over 2000 consecutive patients were analyzed, of which 355 patients met the inclusion criteria. The primary composite endpoint was in-hospital mortality, moderate or greater paravalvular (PVL), stroke, conversion to open surgery, aortic valve re-intervention, and/or need for PPM. Secondary endpoints were length of stay, NYHA classification at 1 month and 1 year, mortality at 1 month and 1 year, mean valve gradient at 1 month, KCCQ score at 1 month, and ≥ moderate PVL at 1 month. There was no difference in the primary composite endpoint between the two groups (23.6% for VLEF vs. 25.3% for LEF, <i>p</i> = 0.29). During TAVR placement, 40% of patients in the VLEF group required ≥1 vasopressors for hypotension lasting ≥30 min vs. only 21% of patients in the LEF group (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use during procedure was greater in the VLEF group (9% vs. 1%, <i>p</i> < 0.01)—all placed post TAVR. Emergency ECMO use was higher in the VLEF group as well (5% vs. 0%). Total length of stay was significantly different between the two groups as well (6 days vs. 3 days, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Both groups had a change in LVEF of ~10%. One-year outcomes were similar between the groups. All-cause mortality at 1 year was not significantly different at 1 year (13% for VLEF vs. 11% for LEF), and KCC scores were also similar (77.54 vs. 74.97). Mean aortic valve gradients were also similar (12 mmHg vs. 11 mmHg, <i>p</i> = 0.48). Our study suggests that patients with EF ≤ 20% can safely have TAVR with similar periprocedural outcomes compared to patients with EF > 20% to ≤40% despite higher rates of vasopressor and mechanical support.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T06:22:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8260f1a7572c4054807b127acd2a7a91
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T06:22:10Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-8260f1a7572c4054807b127acd2a7a912023-11-17T11:52:13ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832023-03-01126239010.3390/jcm12062390Comparison of Periprocedural and Intermediate-Term Outcomes of TAVI in Patients with Ejection Fraction ≤ 20% vs. Patients with 20% < EF ≤ 40%Arber Kodra0Michael Cinelli1Renita Alexander2Rahming Hamfreth3Denny Wang4Shankar Thampi5Craig Basman6Chad Kliger7Jacob Scheinerman8Luigi Pirelli9Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY 10075, USADepartment of Cardiology, Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY 10305, USADepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY 10075, USADepartment of Cardiology, Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY 10305, USADepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY 10075, USADepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY 10075, USADepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY 10075, USADepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY 10075, USADepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY 10075, USADepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY 10075, USATreatment of congestive heart failure (CHF) with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and severe aortic stenosis (AS) is challenging, yet transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a suitable treatment option in such patients. We compared the periprocedural outcomes of TAVR in patients with an ejection fraction (EF) of ≤20% (VLEF group) to patients with an EF > 20% to ≤40% (LEF group). We included patients with severe AS and reduced LV ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 40%) who underwent TAVR at four centers within Northwell Health between January 2016 and December 2020. Over 2000 consecutive patients were analyzed, of which 355 patients met the inclusion criteria. The primary composite endpoint was in-hospital mortality, moderate or greater paravalvular (PVL), stroke, conversion to open surgery, aortic valve re-intervention, and/or need for PPM. Secondary endpoints were length of stay, NYHA classification at 1 month and 1 year, mortality at 1 month and 1 year, mean valve gradient at 1 month, KCCQ score at 1 month, and ≥ moderate PVL at 1 month. There was no difference in the primary composite endpoint between the two groups (23.6% for VLEF vs. 25.3% for LEF, <i>p</i> = 0.29). During TAVR placement, 40% of patients in the VLEF group required ≥1 vasopressors for hypotension lasting ≥30 min vs. only 21% of patients in the LEF group (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use during procedure was greater in the VLEF group (9% vs. 1%, <i>p</i> < 0.01)—all placed post TAVR. Emergency ECMO use was higher in the VLEF group as well (5% vs. 0%). Total length of stay was significantly different between the two groups as well (6 days vs. 3 days, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Both groups had a change in LVEF of ~10%. One-year outcomes were similar between the groups. All-cause mortality at 1 year was not significantly different at 1 year (13% for VLEF vs. 11% for LEF), and KCC scores were also similar (77.54 vs. 74.97). Mean aortic valve gradients were also similar (12 mmHg vs. 11 mmHg, <i>p</i> = 0.48). Our study suggests that patients with EF ≤ 20% can safely have TAVR with similar periprocedural outcomes compared to patients with EF > 20% to ≤40% despite higher rates of vasopressor and mechanical support.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/6/2390transcatheter aortic valve replacementlow ejection fractioninotropesassist devices
spellingShingle Arber Kodra
Michael Cinelli
Renita Alexander
Rahming Hamfreth
Denny Wang
Shankar Thampi
Craig Basman
Chad Kliger
Jacob Scheinerman
Luigi Pirelli
Comparison of Periprocedural and Intermediate-Term Outcomes of TAVI in Patients with Ejection Fraction ≤ 20% vs. Patients with 20% < EF ≤ 40%
Journal of Clinical Medicine
transcatheter aortic valve replacement
low ejection fraction
inotropes
assist devices
title Comparison of Periprocedural and Intermediate-Term Outcomes of TAVI in Patients with Ejection Fraction ≤ 20% vs. Patients with 20% < EF ≤ 40%
title_full Comparison of Periprocedural and Intermediate-Term Outcomes of TAVI in Patients with Ejection Fraction ≤ 20% vs. Patients with 20% < EF ≤ 40%
title_fullStr Comparison of Periprocedural and Intermediate-Term Outcomes of TAVI in Patients with Ejection Fraction ≤ 20% vs. Patients with 20% < EF ≤ 40%
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Periprocedural and Intermediate-Term Outcomes of TAVI in Patients with Ejection Fraction ≤ 20% vs. Patients with 20% < EF ≤ 40%
title_short Comparison of Periprocedural and Intermediate-Term Outcomes of TAVI in Patients with Ejection Fraction ≤ 20% vs. Patients with 20% < EF ≤ 40%
title_sort comparison of periprocedural and intermediate term outcomes of tavi in patients with ejection fraction ≤ 20 vs patients with 20 ef ≤ 40
topic transcatheter aortic valve replacement
low ejection fraction
inotropes
assist devices
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/6/2390
work_keys_str_mv AT arberkodra comparisonofperiproceduralandintermediatetermoutcomesoftaviinpatientswithejectionfraction20vspatientswith20ef40
AT michaelcinelli comparisonofperiproceduralandintermediatetermoutcomesoftaviinpatientswithejectionfraction20vspatientswith20ef40
AT renitaalexander comparisonofperiproceduralandintermediatetermoutcomesoftaviinpatientswithejectionfraction20vspatientswith20ef40
AT rahminghamfreth comparisonofperiproceduralandintermediatetermoutcomesoftaviinpatientswithejectionfraction20vspatientswith20ef40
AT dennywang comparisonofperiproceduralandintermediatetermoutcomesoftaviinpatientswithejectionfraction20vspatientswith20ef40
AT shankarthampi comparisonofperiproceduralandintermediatetermoutcomesoftaviinpatientswithejectionfraction20vspatientswith20ef40
AT craigbasman comparisonofperiproceduralandintermediatetermoutcomesoftaviinpatientswithejectionfraction20vspatientswith20ef40
AT chadkliger comparisonofperiproceduralandintermediatetermoutcomesoftaviinpatientswithejectionfraction20vspatientswith20ef40
AT jacobscheinerman comparisonofperiproceduralandintermediatetermoutcomesoftaviinpatientswithejectionfraction20vspatientswith20ef40
AT luigipirelli comparisonofperiproceduralandintermediatetermoutcomesoftaviinpatientswithejectionfraction20vspatientswith20ef40