Validation of a German Version of the Grief Cognitions Questionnaire and Establishment of a Short Form

BackgroundWhereas the majority of bereaved persons recover from their grief without professional assistance, a minority develops pathological grief reactions. Etiological models postulate that dysfunctional cognitions may perpetuate such reactions. The Grief Cognitions Questionnaire (GCQ) assesses t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bettina K. Doering, Paul A. Boelen, Maarten C. Eisma, Antonia Barke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.620987/full
_version_ 1819054829423558656
author Bettina K. Doering
Paul A. Boelen
Paul A. Boelen
Maarten C. Eisma
Antonia Barke
author_facet Bettina K. Doering
Paul A. Boelen
Paul A. Boelen
Maarten C. Eisma
Antonia Barke
author_sort Bettina K. Doering
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundWhereas the majority of bereaved persons recover from their grief without professional assistance, a minority develops pathological grief reactions. Etiological models postulate that dysfunctional cognitions may perpetuate such reactions. The Grief Cognitions Questionnaire (GCQ) assesses thoughts after bereavement in nine interrelated domains. A short form (GCQ-SF) with four domains is often used. However, an evaluation of the psychometric properties of the GCQ-SF and its utility compared to the GCQ is lacking and these instruments have not been validated in German.MethodGerman bereaved persons (time since loss 35.3 ± 34.6 months) responded to an online survey containing the GCQ, measures of grief severity, grief rumination, symptoms of depression and anxiety, and optimism and pessimism. 585 participants (18–78 years, 88% women) were included. Item analyses and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted. Correlations between the GCQ and GCQ-SF and grief rumination, optimism and pessimism assessed construct validity. Criterion-related validity was assessed by comparing whether the correlation of the GCQ (and the GCQ-SF) with grief severity was higher than with anxious and depressive symptoms. Logistic regression and receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) compared the questionnaires on their ability to predict probable prolonged grief ‘caseness’ (ICG ≥ 25, time since loss ≥6 months).ResultsInternal consistencies for both questionnaires were identical and excellent (α = 0.96). Confirmatory factor analyses obtained a satisfactory fit for models with nine and four correlated subscales and respective higher-order factor models. The GCQ and the GCQ-SF correlated higher with grief severity than with other measures of psychopathology. The logistic regression showed a significant association between the GCQ-SF and prolonged grief ‘caseness’. Of the remaining subscales of the GCQ, only one subscale (‘Others’) contributed to the prediction. The ROC analyses showed nearly identical areas under the curve.ConclusionThe translated GCQ and GCQ-SF demonstrated very good psychometric properties. The correlations with grief severity highlight the questionnaires’ clinical relevance. The questionnaires possessed identical diagnostic specificity and sensitivity. Whenever a timesaving assessment of the most typical grief-specific cognitions is important, the GCQ-SF represents an alternative to the GCQ. The original GCQ may still be superior when a more detailed description of a bereaved person’s cognitions is desirable.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T12:57:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-826123060aa9483b9eaa98607f0e16f0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T12:57:50Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-826123060aa9483b9eaa98607f0e16f02022-12-21T19:03:16ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-01-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.620987620987Validation of a German Version of the Grief Cognitions Questionnaire and Establishment of a Short FormBettina K. Doering0Paul A. Boelen1Paul A. Boelen2Maarten C. Eisma3Antonia Barke4Clinical and Biological Psychology, Catholic University Eichstaett-Ingolstadt, Eichstaett, GermanyClinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, NetherlandsARQ National Psychotrauma Centre, Diemen, NetherlandsDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, University of Groningen, Groningen, NetherlandsClinical and Biological Psychology, Catholic University Eichstaett-Ingolstadt, Eichstaett, GermanyBackgroundWhereas the majority of bereaved persons recover from their grief without professional assistance, a minority develops pathological grief reactions. Etiological models postulate that dysfunctional cognitions may perpetuate such reactions. The Grief Cognitions Questionnaire (GCQ) assesses thoughts after bereavement in nine interrelated domains. A short form (GCQ-SF) with four domains is often used. However, an evaluation of the psychometric properties of the GCQ-SF and its utility compared to the GCQ is lacking and these instruments have not been validated in German.MethodGerman bereaved persons (time since loss 35.3 ± 34.6 months) responded to an online survey containing the GCQ, measures of grief severity, grief rumination, symptoms of depression and anxiety, and optimism and pessimism. 585 participants (18–78 years, 88% women) were included. Item analyses and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted. Correlations between the GCQ and GCQ-SF and grief rumination, optimism and pessimism assessed construct validity. Criterion-related validity was assessed by comparing whether the correlation of the GCQ (and the GCQ-SF) with grief severity was higher than with anxious and depressive symptoms. Logistic regression and receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) compared the questionnaires on their ability to predict probable prolonged grief ‘caseness’ (ICG ≥ 25, time since loss ≥6 months).ResultsInternal consistencies for both questionnaires were identical and excellent (α = 0.96). Confirmatory factor analyses obtained a satisfactory fit for models with nine and four correlated subscales and respective higher-order factor models. The GCQ and the GCQ-SF correlated higher with grief severity than with other measures of psychopathology. The logistic regression showed a significant association between the GCQ-SF and prolonged grief ‘caseness’. Of the remaining subscales of the GCQ, only one subscale (‘Others’) contributed to the prediction. The ROC analyses showed nearly identical areas under the curve.ConclusionThe translated GCQ and GCQ-SF demonstrated very good psychometric properties. The correlations with grief severity highlight the questionnaires’ clinical relevance. The questionnaires possessed identical diagnostic specificity and sensitivity. Whenever a timesaving assessment of the most typical grief-specific cognitions is important, the GCQ-SF represents an alternative to the GCQ. The original GCQ may still be superior when a more detailed description of a bereaved person’s cognitions is desirable.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.620987/fullgriefbereavementcognitionvalidation studyquestionnaire
spellingShingle Bettina K. Doering
Paul A. Boelen
Paul A. Boelen
Maarten C. Eisma
Antonia Barke
Validation of a German Version of the Grief Cognitions Questionnaire and Establishment of a Short Form
Frontiers in Psychology
grief
bereavement
cognition
validation study
questionnaire
title Validation of a German Version of the Grief Cognitions Questionnaire and Establishment of a Short Form
title_full Validation of a German Version of the Grief Cognitions Questionnaire and Establishment of a Short Form
title_fullStr Validation of a German Version of the Grief Cognitions Questionnaire and Establishment of a Short Form
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a German Version of the Grief Cognitions Questionnaire and Establishment of a Short Form
title_short Validation of a German Version of the Grief Cognitions Questionnaire and Establishment of a Short Form
title_sort validation of a german version of the grief cognitions questionnaire and establishment of a short form
topic grief
bereavement
cognition
validation study
questionnaire
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.620987/full
work_keys_str_mv AT bettinakdoering validationofagermanversionofthegriefcognitionsquestionnaireandestablishmentofashortform
AT paulaboelen validationofagermanversionofthegriefcognitionsquestionnaireandestablishmentofashortform
AT paulaboelen validationofagermanversionofthegriefcognitionsquestionnaireandestablishmentofashortform
AT maartenceisma validationofagermanversionofthegriefcognitionsquestionnaireandestablishmentofashortform
AT antoniabarke validationofagermanversionofthegriefcognitionsquestionnaireandestablishmentofashortform