Should editors with multiple retractions or a record of academic misconduct serve on journal editorial boards?

In the academic world, despite their corrective nature, there is still a negative stigma attached to retractions, even more so if they are based on ethical infractions. Editors-in-chief and editors are role models in academic and scholarly communities. Thus, if they have multiple retractions or a re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2022-12-01
Series:European Science Editing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ese.arphahub.com/article/95926/download/pdf/
_version_ 1797421470860705792
author Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
author_facet Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
author_sort Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
collection DOAJ
description In the academic world, despite their corrective nature, there is still a negative stigma attached to retractions, even more so if they are based on ethical infractions. Editors-in-chief and editors are role models in academic and scholarly communities. Thus, if they have multiple retractions or a record of academic misconduct, this viewpoint argues that they should not serve on journals’ editorial boards. The exception is where such individuals have displayed a clear path of scholarly reform. Policy and guidance is needed by organizations such as the Committee on Publication Ethics.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T07:17:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-827959f3dc6f4d71abff94a2fd263dfe
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2518-3354
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T07:17:58Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Pensoft Publishers
record_format Article
series European Science Editing
spelling doaj.art-827959f3dc6f4d71abff94a2fd263dfe2023-12-03T08:17:44ZengPensoft PublishersEuropean Science Editing2518-33542022-12-01481610.3897/ese.2022.e9592695926Should editors with multiple retractions or a record of academic misconduct serve on journal editorial boards?Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva0UnaffiliatedIn the academic world, despite their corrective nature, there is still a negative stigma attached to retractions, even more so if they are based on ethical infractions. Editors-in-chief and editors are role models in academic and scholarly communities. Thus, if they have multiple retractions or a record of academic misconduct, this viewpoint argues that they should not serve on journals’ editorial boards. The exception is where such individuals have displayed a clear path of scholarly reform. Policy and guidance is needed by organizations such as the Committee on Publication Ethics.https://ese.arphahub.com/article/95926/download/pdf/Academic imagecorrective sciencereformrespon
spellingShingle Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
Should editors with multiple retractions or a record of academic misconduct serve on journal editorial boards?
European Science Editing
Academic image
corrective science
reform
respon
title Should editors with multiple retractions or a record of academic misconduct serve on journal editorial boards?
title_full Should editors with multiple retractions or a record of academic misconduct serve on journal editorial boards?
title_fullStr Should editors with multiple retractions or a record of academic misconduct serve on journal editorial boards?
title_full_unstemmed Should editors with multiple retractions or a record of academic misconduct serve on journal editorial boards?
title_short Should editors with multiple retractions or a record of academic misconduct serve on journal editorial boards?
title_sort should editors with multiple retractions or a record of academic misconduct serve on journal editorial boards
topic Academic image
corrective science
reform
respon
url https://ese.arphahub.com/article/95926/download/pdf/
work_keys_str_mv AT jaimeateixeiradasilva shouldeditorswithmultipleretractionsorarecordofacademicmisconductserveonjournaleditorialboards