Should editors with multiple retractions or a record of academic misconduct serve on journal editorial boards?
In the academic world, despite their corrective nature, there is still a negative stigma attached to retractions, even more so if they are based on ethical infractions. Editors-in-chief and editors are role models in academic and scholarly communities. Thus, if they have multiple retractions or a re...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Pensoft Publishers
2022-12-01
|
Series: | European Science Editing |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ese.arphahub.com/article/95926/download/pdf/ |
_version_ | 1797421470860705792 |
---|---|
author | Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva |
author_facet | Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva |
author_sort | Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In the academic world, despite their corrective nature, there is still a negative stigma attached to retractions, even more so if they are based on ethical infractions. Editors-in-chief and editors are role models in academic and scholarly communities. Thus, if they have multiple retractions or a record of academic misconduct, this viewpoint argues that they should not serve on journals’ editorial boards. The exception is where such individuals have displayed a clear path of scholarly reform. Policy and guidance is needed by organizations such as the Committee on Publication Ethics. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T07:17:58Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-827959f3dc6f4d71abff94a2fd263dfe |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2518-3354 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T07:17:58Z |
publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
publisher | Pensoft Publishers |
record_format | Article |
series | European Science Editing |
spelling | doaj.art-827959f3dc6f4d71abff94a2fd263dfe2023-12-03T08:17:44ZengPensoft PublishersEuropean Science Editing2518-33542022-12-01481610.3897/ese.2022.e9592695926Should editors with multiple retractions or a record of academic misconduct serve on journal editorial boards?Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva0UnaffiliatedIn the academic world, despite their corrective nature, there is still a negative stigma attached to retractions, even more so if they are based on ethical infractions. Editors-in-chief and editors are role models in academic and scholarly communities. Thus, if they have multiple retractions or a record of academic misconduct, this viewpoint argues that they should not serve on journals’ editorial boards. The exception is where such individuals have displayed a clear path of scholarly reform. Policy and guidance is needed by organizations such as the Committee on Publication Ethics.https://ese.arphahub.com/article/95926/download/pdf/Academic imagecorrective sciencereformrespon |
spellingShingle | Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva Should editors with multiple retractions or a record of academic misconduct serve on journal editorial boards? European Science Editing Academic image corrective science reform respon |
title | Should editors with multiple retractions or a record of academic misconduct serve on journal editorial boards? |
title_full | Should editors with multiple retractions or a record of academic misconduct serve on journal editorial boards? |
title_fullStr | Should editors with multiple retractions or a record of academic misconduct serve on journal editorial boards? |
title_full_unstemmed | Should editors with multiple retractions or a record of academic misconduct serve on journal editorial boards? |
title_short | Should editors with multiple retractions or a record of academic misconduct serve on journal editorial boards? |
title_sort | should editors with multiple retractions or a record of academic misconduct serve on journal editorial boards |
topic | Academic image corrective science reform respon |
url | https://ese.arphahub.com/article/95926/download/pdf/ |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jaimeateixeiradasilva shouldeditorswithmultipleretractionsorarecordofacademicmisconductserveonjournaleditorialboards |