Additional chemical polymerization of dual resin cements: reality or a goal to be achieved?

Abstract Introduction This study serves as a warning to dentists and researchers that dual-cured resin cements may not polymerize completely under some prosthetic crowns. Objective The aim of this study was to analyse the polymerization degree of dual-cured resin cements under prosthetic barrier,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luzia Sakaguti UMETSUBO, Karen Cristina Kazue YUI, Alessandra Bühler BORGES, Daphne Camara BARCELLOS, Sérgio Eduardo de Paiva GONÇALVES
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual Paulista
Series:Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772016000300159&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1811268789509029888
author Luzia Sakaguti UMETSUBO
Karen Cristina Kazue YUI
Alessandra Bühler BORGES
Daphne Camara BARCELLOS
Sérgio Eduardo de Paiva GONÇALVES
author_facet Luzia Sakaguti UMETSUBO
Karen Cristina Kazue YUI
Alessandra Bühler BORGES
Daphne Camara BARCELLOS
Sérgio Eduardo de Paiva GONÇALVES
author_sort Luzia Sakaguti UMETSUBO
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction This study serves as a warning to dentists and researchers that dual-cured resin cements may not polymerize completely under some prosthetic crowns. Objective The aim of this study was to analyse the polymerization degree of dual-cured resin cements under prosthetic barrier, by microhardness test. Material and method Three cements (Bistite II, RelyX ARC and Variolink II) were light-cured through different barriers, placed between the cement and the light source: G1: without barrier; G2: composite resin (Cesead); G3: Inceram alumina; G4: IPS Empress; G5: Inceram zirconia; G6: tooth fragment. Photopolymerization was carried out using a halogen light unit (650 mW/cm2); microhardness was evaluated using the Microhardness Tester FM 700, under a load of 50gf with a dwell time of 15s, at two evaluation times (30min and 24h). Result The results were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey tests (5%). Both Inceram alumina and Inceram zirconia ceramic barriers hindered polymerization. Bistite, followed by RelyX and Variolink, exhibited the highest microhardness values (p<0.05). As the highest values were obtained without a barrier, it was determined that the barrier, followed by the tooth, influenced microhardness. Both Empress and Cesead had the smallest microhardness values but with no statistically significant difference between them. Conclusion The barrier negatively affected the microhardness of dual-cured resin cements; evaluation time did not affect microhardness values for most of the conditions tested. There is a limited effect of the chemical activator on the polymerization of some dual-cured cements, and their performance is product specific.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T21:29:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8282183f816e4401bb8b2ede4441c4f5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1807-2577
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T21:29:23Z
publisher Universidade Estadual Paulista
record_format Article
series Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
spelling doaj.art-8282183f816e4401bb8b2ede4441c4f52022-12-22T03:16:05ZengUniversidade Estadual PaulistaRevista de Odontologia da UNESP1807-257745315916410.1590/1807-2577.12415S1807-25772016000300159Additional chemical polymerization of dual resin cements: reality or a goal to be achieved?Luzia Sakaguti UMETSUBOKaren Cristina Kazue YUIAlessandra Bühler BORGESDaphne Camara BARCELLOSSérgio Eduardo de Paiva GONÇALVESAbstract Introduction This study serves as a warning to dentists and researchers that dual-cured resin cements may not polymerize completely under some prosthetic crowns. Objective The aim of this study was to analyse the polymerization degree of dual-cured resin cements under prosthetic barrier, by microhardness test. Material and method Three cements (Bistite II, RelyX ARC and Variolink II) were light-cured through different barriers, placed between the cement and the light source: G1: without barrier; G2: composite resin (Cesead); G3: Inceram alumina; G4: IPS Empress; G5: Inceram zirconia; G6: tooth fragment. Photopolymerization was carried out using a halogen light unit (650 mW/cm2); microhardness was evaluated using the Microhardness Tester FM 700, under a load of 50gf with a dwell time of 15s, at two evaluation times (30min and 24h). Result The results were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey tests (5%). Both Inceram alumina and Inceram zirconia ceramic barriers hindered polymerization. Bistite, followed by RelyX and Variolink, exhibited the highest microhardness values (p<0.05). As the highest values were obtained without a barrier, it was determined that the barrier, followed by the tooth, influenced microhardness. Both Empress and Cesead had the smallest microhardness values but with no statistically significant difference between them. Conclusion The barrier negatively affected the microhardness of dual-cured resin cements; evaluation time did not affect microhardness values for most of the conditions tested. There is a limited effect of the chemical activator on the polymerization of some dual-cured cements, and their performance is product specific.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772016000300159&lng=en&tlng=enDental cementsmicrohardnesscementationpolymerization
spellingShingle Luzia Sakaguti UMETSUBO
Karen Cristina Kazue YUI
Alessandra Bühler BORGES
Daphne Camara BARCELLOS
Sérgio Eduardo de Paiva GONÇALVES
Additional chemical polymerization of dual resin cements: reality or a goal to be achieved?
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
Dental cements
microhardness
cementation
polymerization
title Additional chemical polymerization of dual resin cements: reality or a goal to be achieved?
title_full Additional chemical polymerization of dual resin cements: reality or a goal to be achieved?
title_fullStr Additional chemical polymerization of dual resin cements: reality or a goal to be achieved?
title_full_unstemmed Additional chemical polymerization of dual resin cements: reality or a goal to be achieved?
title_short Additional chemical polymerization of dual resin cements: reality or a goal to be achieved?
title_sort additional chemical polymerization of dual resin cements reality or a goal to be achieved
topic Dental cements
microhardness
cementation
polymerization
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772016000300159&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT luziasakagutiumetsubo additionalchemicalpolymerizationofdualresincementsrealityoragoaltobeachieved
AT karencristinakazueyui additionalchemicalpolymerizationofdualresincementsrealityoragoaltobeachieved
AT alessandrabuhlerborges additionalchemicalpolymerizationofdualresincementsrealityoragoaltobeachieved
AT daphnecamarabarcellos additionalchemicalpolymerizationofdualresincementsrealityoragoaltobeachieved
AT sergioeduardodepaivagoncalves additionalchemicalpolymerizationofdualresincementsrealityoragoaltobeachieved