Probative Value of Data Obtained Through Technical Surveillance

The present paper aims at analyzing the probative value of data obtained through technical surveillance, as the efficiency of the fight against corruption and organized crime calls for the use of modern investigative means and judicial bodies increasingly resort to the use of technical surveillanc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andrei Bacauanu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Danubius University 2018-05-01
Series:EIRP Proceedings
Subjects:
Online Access:http://proceedings.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/eirp/article/view/1874/1935
_version_ 1828894420077903872
author Andrei Bacauanu
author_facet Andrei Bacauanu
author_sort Andrei Bacauanu
collection DOAJ
description The present paper aims at analyzing the probative value of data obtained through technical surveillance, as the efficiency of the fight against corruption and organized crime calls for the use of modern investigative means and judicial bodies increasingly resort to the use of technical surveillance to obtain evidence in criminal proceedings. Statistical data from the courts attests to the large number of requests for authorization of interception of communications, a context in which we can state that this measure became a routine measure in criminal cases. Usage of intercepted communications as evidence obtained in other cases raises serious questions as to ensuring the proportionality of the interference with the right to privacy and with the pursued scope which must be legitimate, concrete, known, verified and analyzed by the judge at the time of authorization and not a future one, hypothetically, which may later arise in other causes. Another question marks the legal basis, in terms of quality and compatibility with the principle of the preeminence of law, the storage and archiving of communications for a long time, for use in other future causes. The academic and practical interest of the present study lies in the fact that it addresses both law theorists and practitioners in the field as it analyzes how judicial bodies can use data relevant to the criminal process, obtained through modern surveillance techniques.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T14:11:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-828e767fac5d4a36ac62e72a05ac5dac
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2067-9211
2069-9344
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T14:11:12Z
publishDate 2018-05-01
publisher Danubius University
record_format Article
series EIRP Proceedings
spelling doaj.art-828e767fac5d4a36ac62e72a05ac5dac2022-12-21T23:42:28ZengDanubius UniversityEIRP Proceedings2067-92112069-93442018-05-011316877Probative Value of Data Obtained Through Technical SurveillanceAndrei Bacauanu0Al. I. Cuza University of IasiThe present paper aims at analyzing the probative value of data obtained through technical surveillance, as the efficiency of the fight against corruption and organized crime calls for the use of modern investigative means and judicial bodies increasingly resort to the use of technical surveillance to obtain evidence in criminal proceedings. Statistical data from the courts attests to the large number of requests for authorization of interception of communications, a context in which we can state that this measure became a routine measure in criminal cases. Usage of intercepted communications as evidence obtained in other cases raises serious questions as to ensuring the proportionality of the interference with the right to privacy and with the pursued scope which must be legitimate, concrete, known, verified and analyzed by the judge at the time of authorization and not a future one, hypothetically, which may later arise in other causes. Another question marks the legal basis, in terms of quality and compatibility with the principle of the preeminence of law, the storage and archiving of communications for a long time, for use in other future causes. The academic and practical interest of the present study lies in the fact that it addresses both law theorists and practitioners in the field as it analyzes how judicial bodies can use data relevant to the criminal process, obtained through modern surveillance techniques.http://proceedings.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/eirp/article/view/1874/1935technical surveillance; interception; wiretap; probative value
spellingShingle Andrei Bacauanu
Probative Value of Data Obtained Through Technical Surveillance
EIRP Proceedings
technical surveillance; interception; wiretap; probative value
title Probative Value of Data Obtained Through Technical Surveillance
title_full Probative Value of Data Obtained Through Technical Surveillance
title_fullStr Probative Value of Data Obtained Through Technical Surveillance
title_full_unstemmed Probative Value of Data Obtained Through Technical Surveillance
title_short Probative Value of Data Obtained Through Technical Surveillance
title_sort probative value of data obtained through technical surveillance
topic technical surveillance; interception; wiretap; probative value
url http://proceedings.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/eirp/article/view/1874/1935
work_keys_str_mv AT andreibacauanu probativevalueofdataobtainedthroughtechnicalsurveillance