The independence and impartiality of the hybrid CETA Investment Court System: Reflections in the aftermath of Opinion 1/17
In its recent Opinion 1/17, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) examined the compatibility of an external judicial body, the Investment Court System (ICS) under the EU–Canada Comprehensive and Economic Trade Agreement (CETA), with EU law. At a time when judicial independence has arisen as one of t...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
UCL Press
2020-08-01
|
| Series: | Europe and the World |
| Online Access: | https://uclpress.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2020.26 |
| _version_ | 1797896130029158400 |
|---|---|
| author | Maria Fanou |
| author_facet | Maria Fanou |
| author_sort | Maria Fanou |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In its recent Opinion 1/17, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) examined the compatibility of an external judicial body, the Investment Court System (ICS) under the EU–Canada Comprehensive and Economic Trade Agreement (CETA), with EU law. At a time when judicial independence has arisen as one of the main challenges for the rule of law in the EU, this article discusses the Court’s findings in relation to the compatibility of the ICS with the right of access to an independent and impartial tribunal. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T07:38:00Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-82a7170d896840df828817dc2fcdc30d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2399-2875 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T07:38:00Z |
| publishDate | 2020-08-01 |
| publisher | UCL Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Europe and the World |
| spelling | doaj.art-82a7170d896840df828817dc2fcdc30d2023-02-23T12:25:57ZengUCL PressEurope and the World2399-28752020-08-01410.14324/111.444.ewlj.2020.26The independence and impartiality of the hybrid CETA Investment Court System: Reflections in the aftermath of Opinion 1/17Maria FanouIn its recent Opinion 1/17, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) examined the compatibility of an external judicial body, the Investment Court System (ICS) under the EU–Canada Comprehensive and Economic Trade Agreement (CETA), with EU law. At a time when judicial independence has arisen as one of the main challenges for the rule of law in the EU, this article discusses the Court’s findings in relation to the compatibility of the ICS with the right of access to an independent and impartial tribunal.https://uclpress.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2020.26 |
| spellingShingle | Maria Fanou The independence and impartiality of the hybrid CETA Investment Court System: Reflections in the aftermath of Opinion 1/17 Europe and the World |
| title | The independence and impartiality of the hybrid CETA Investment Court System: Reflections in the aftermath of Opinion 1/17 |
| title_full | The independence and impartiality of the hybrid CETA Investment Court System: Reflections in the aftermath of Opinion 1/17 |
| title_fullStr | The independence and impartiality of the hybrid CETA Investment Court System: Reflections in the aftermath of Opinion 1/17 |
| title_full_unstemmed | The independence and impartiality of the hybrid CETA Investment Court System: Reflections in the aftermath of Opinion 1/17 |
| title_short | The independence and impartiality of the hybrid CETA Investment Court System: Reflections in the aftermath of Opinion 1/17 |
| title_sort | independence and impartiality of the hybrid ceta investment court system reflections in the aftermath of opinion 1 17 |
| url | https://uclpress.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2020.26 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mariafanou theindependenceandimpartialityofthehybridcetainvestmentcourtsystemreflectionsintheaftermathofopinion117 AT mariafanou independenceandimpartialityofthehybridcetainvestmentcourtsystemreflectionsintheaftermathofopinion117 |