Discourse organization of argumentative speeches: Implications for teaching argumentative writing
This paper examines the discourse organization of argumentative speeches of the debaters of Ateneo de Manila University (ADMU). A total of 20 constructive speeches were used as sources of data for this study. These speeches were taken from the following debate programs: ANC Square Off: The Philippin...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Department of English, Faculty of Arts and Letters, University of Santo Tomas
2013-10-01
|
Series: | Asian Journal of English Language Studies (AJELS) |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ajels.ust.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/5-Discourse-organization-of-argumentative-speeches-Implications-for-teaching-argumentative-writing.pdf |
_version_ | 1818128990499504128 |
---|---|
author | Marie Claire Timbreza Duque |
author_facet | Marie Claire Timbreza Duque |
author_sort | Marie Claire Timbreza Duque |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This paper examines the discourse organization of argumentative speeches of the debaters of Ateneo de Manila University (ADMU). A total of 20 constructive speeches were used as sources of data for this study. These speeches were taken from the following debate programs: ANC Square Off: The Philippine Debate Championships; ANC Square Off: The AUDC; and ANC Frank-ahan: The Drilon Debates. Frequency and percentage distributions were used to determine the discourse organization found in the argumentative speeches. Findings revealed that the debaters use two-move patterns in the orientation, exposition, and summation blocks of their speeches, namely “orientation” and “focusing,” “inquiry” and “response,” and “rounding-off” and “final stance,” respectively. This study offers a more detailed explanation on how argumentative essays may be structured through studying spoken discourse. Thus, student writers may benefit from a more specific instruction in the discrete elements of an argument, including how to formulate an effective claim, how to support a claim with evidence effectively, and how to reach the requirements of the argumentative genre. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-11T07:42:02Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-82b14e9c0b5a449ea0b317f30dc1561a |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2619-7219 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-11T07:42:02Z |
publishDate | 2013-10-01 |
publisher | Department of English, Faculty of Arts and Letters, University of Santo Tomas |
record_format | Article |
series | Asian Journal of English Language Studies (AJELS) |
spelling | doaj.art-82b14e9c0b5a449ea0b317f30dc1561a2022-12-22T01:15:32ZengDepartment of English, Faculty of Arts and Letters, University of Santo TomasAsian Journal of English Language Studies (AJELS)2619-72192013-10-01186116Discourse organization of argumentative speeches: Implications for teaching argumentative writingMarie Claire Timbreza Duque0Polytechnic University of the Philippines, ManilaThis paper examines the discourse organization of argumentative speeches of the debaters of Ateneo de Manila University (ADMU). A total of 20 constructive speeches were used as sources of data for this study. These speeches were taken from the following debate programs: ANC Square Off: The Philippine Debate Championships; ANC Square Off: The AUDC; and ANC Frank-ahan: The Drilon Debates. Frequency and percentage distributions were used to determine the discourse organization found in the argumentative speeches. Findings revealed that the debaters use two-move patterns in the orientation, exposition, and summation blocks of their speeches, namely “orientation” and “focusing,” “inquiry” and “response,” and “rounding-off” and “final stance,” respectively. This study offers a more detailed explanation on how argumentative essays may be structured through studying spoken discourse. Thus, student writers may benefit from a more specific instruction in the discrete elements of an argument, including how to formulate an effective claim, how to support a claim with evidence effectively, and how to reach the requirements of the argumentative genre.https://ajels.ust.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/5-Discourse-organization-of-argumentative-speeches-Implications-for-teaching-argumentative-writing.pdfdiscourse organizationargumentative speechdebateargumentative writingmoves and steps in writing |
spellingShingle | Marie Claire Timbreza Duque Discourse organization of argumentative speeches: Implications for teaching argumentative writing Asian Journal of English Language Studies (AJELS) discourse organization argumentative speech debate argumentative writing moves and steps in writing |
title | Discourse organization of argumentative speeches: Implications for teaching argumentative writing |
title_full | Discourse organization of argumentative speeches: Implications for teaching argumentative writing |
title_fullStr | Discourse organization of argumentative speeches: Implications for teaching argumentative writing |
title_full_unstemmed | Discourse organization of argumentative speeches: Implications for teaching argumentative writing |
title_short | Discourse organization of argumentative speeches: Implications for teaching argumentative writing |
title_sort | discourse organization of argumentative speeches implications for teaching argumentative writing |
topic | discourse organization argumentative speech debate argumentative writing moves and steps in writing |
url | https://ajels.ust.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/5-Discourse-organization-of-argumentative-speeches-Implications-for-teaching-argumentative-writing.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marieclairetimbrezaduque discourseorganizationofargumentativespeechesimplicationsforteachingargumentativewriting |