Performance, intake and feed efficiency of Nellore young bulls housed in individual or group pens

Feed is the most expensive input in any livestock production system including beef cattle, therefore feed efficiency improvements can contribute to cost reduction. Residual feed intake (RFI) is one of the important measures of animal efficiency and can be defined as the difference between actual fee...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: André Lasmar Guimarães, Thaís Matos Ceacero, Welder Angelo Baldassini, Thiago Martins Pivaro, Lucia Galvão de Albuquerque, Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Instituto de Zootecnia 2015-02-01
Series:Boletim de Indústria Animal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://10.153.18.28/index.php/bia/article/view/440
_version_ 1797744700645441536
author André Lasmar Guimarães
Thaís Matos Ceacero
Welder Angelo Baldassini
Thiago Martins Pivaro
Lucia Galvão de Albuquerque
Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante
author_facet André Lasmar Guimarães
Thaís Matos Ceacero
Welder Angelo Baldassini
Thiago Martins Pivaro
Lucia Galvão de Albuquerque
Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante
author_sort André Lasmar Guimarães
collection DOAJ
description Feed is the most expensive input in any livestock production system including beef cattle, therefore feed efficiency improvements can contribute to cost reduction. Residual feed intake (RFI) is one of the important measures of animal efficiency and can be defined as the difference between actual feed intake (measure at individual or group pens) and predicted feed intake that is required for the observed rate of gain and body weight (BW). The objective here was to evaluate the housing type (individual or group) on variation of traits such as dry matter intake (DMI, kg/d and %BW), average daily gain (ADG), RFI and gain:feed (G:F) in a dataset of Nellore young bulls obtained from performance tests of 83±16 days long after adaptation period, conducted between 2007 and 2013. The animals (273 ± 27 days of age at the beginning of the test) were obtained from selected, traditional and control Nellore lines of Instituto de Zootecnia. The animals were housed in individuals pens (IP) (2007-2012) or group pens (GP) (2012-2013) equipped with the GrowSafe® system (voluntary intake calculated automatically by the system). In IP, animals were fed twice a day and had water available all the time. Voluntary food intake was calculated as the difference between supplied and refused food. Leftovers were collected daily, weighed, and then adjusted to correspond to 10% of the total supplied. A mixed model including housing type as fixed effect and year of test as random effect was fitted. Different residual variances for housing type effect was considered using GROUP option of REPEATED command (PROC MIXED, SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC), and AIC and BIC values were substantially lower compared to model with homogeneous residual variance. No differences (P‰¥0.05) were observed in Nellore young bulls housed in IP or GP on DMI (kg/d) and RFI (Table 1). However, difference occurred for G:F (P=0.0018) and DMI (%BW; P=0.0146), and ADG tended to show difference (P=0.0692) between housing types. In this context, IP seems to provide more precise measures for DMI (%BW) and G:F than GP.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T15:14:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-82bfb48d3fb84f28830ecad2e0256ef4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1981-4100
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T15:14:09Z
publishDate 2015-02-01
publisher Instituto de Zootecnia
record_format Article
series Boletim de Indústria Animal
spelling doaj.art-82bfb48d3fb84f28830ecad2e0256ef42023-08-11T17:41:04ZengInstituto de ZootecniaBoletim de Indústria Animal1981-41002015-02-0171Performance, intake and feed efficiency of Nellore young bulls housed in individual or group pensAndré Lasmar GuimarãesThaís Matos CeaceroWelder Angelo BaldassiniThiago Martins PivaroLucia Galvão de AlbuquerqueMaria Eugênia Zerlotti MercadanteFeed is the most expensive input in any livestock production system including beef cattle, therefore feed efficiency improvements can contribute to cost reduction. Residual feed intake (RFI) is one of the important measures of animal efficiency and can be defined as the difference between actual feed intake (measure at individual or group pens) and predicted feed intake that is required for the observed rate of gain and body weight (BW). The objective here was to evaluate the housing type (individual or group) on variation of traits such as dry matter intake (DMI, kg/d and %BW), average daily gain (ADG), RFI and gain:feed (G:F) in a dataset of Nellore young bulls obtained from performance tests of 83±16 days long after adaptation period, conducted between 2007 and 2013. The animals (273 ± 27 days of age at the beginning of the test) were obtained from selected, traditional and control Nellore lines of Instituto de Zootecnia. The animals were housed in individuals pens (IP) (2007-2012) or group pens (GP) (2012-2013) equipped with the GrowSafe® system (voluntary intake calculated automatically by the system). In IP, animals were fed twice a day and had water available all the time. Voluntary food intake was calculated as the difference between supplied and refused food. Leftovers were collected daily, weighed, and then adjusted to correspond to 10% of the total supplied. A mixed model including housing type as fixed effect and year of test as random effect was fitted. Different residual variances for housing type effect was considered using GROUP option of REPEATED command (PROC MIXED, SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC), and AIC and BIC values were substantially lower compared to model with homogeneous residual variance. No differences (P‰¥0.05) were observed in Nellore young bulls housed in IP or GP on DMI (kg/d) and RFI (Table 1). However, difference occurred for G:F (P=0.0018) and DMI (%BW; P=0.0146), and ADG tended to show difference (P=0.0692) between housing types. In this context, IP seems to provide more precise measures for DMI (%BW) and G:F than GP.http://10.153.18.28/index.php/bia/article/view/440beef cattlehousing typeresidual feed intake
spellingShingle André Lasmar Guimarães
Thaís Matos Ceacero
Welder Angelo Baldassini
Thiago Martins Pivaro
Lucia Galvão de Albuquerque
Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante
Performance, intake and feed efficiency of Nellore young bulls housed in individual or group pens
Boletim de Indústria Animal
beef cattle
housing type
residual feed intake
title Performance, intake and feed efficiency of Nellore young bulls housed in individual or group pens
title_full Performance, intake and feed efficiency of Nellore young bulls housed in individual or group pens
title_fullStr Performance, intake and feed efficiency of Nellore young bulls housed in individual or group pens
title_full_unstemmed Performance, intake and feed efficiency of Nellore young bulls housed in individual or group pens
title_short Performance, intake and feed efficiency of Nellore young bulls housed in individual or group pens
title_sort performance intake and feed efficiency of nellore young bulls housed in individual or group pens
topic beef cattle
housing type
residual feed intake
url http://10.153.18.28/index.php/bia/article/view/440
work_keys_str_mv AT andrelasmarguimaraes performanceintakeandfeedefficiencyofnelloreyoungbullshousedinindividualorgrouppens
AT thaismatosceacero performanceintakeandfeedefficiencyofnelloreyoungbullshousedinindividualorgrouppens
AT welderangelobaldassini performanceintakeandfeedefficiencyofnelloreyoungbullshousedinindividualorgrouppens
AT thiagomartinspivaro performanceintakeandfeedefficiencyofnelloreyoungbullshousedinindividualorgrouppens
AT luciagalvaodealbuquerque performanceintakeandfeedefficiencyofnelloreyoungbullshousedinindividualorgrouppens
AT mariaeugeniazerlottimercadante performanceintakeandfeedefficiencyofnelloreyoungbullshousedinindividualorgrouppens