The North Sea and Svalbard Fisheries Management Regimes in the Context of Brexit: Divergence and Implications

The North Sea fishery has maintained sound and stable cooperative management over the past four decades. European Union (EU) countries exchange quotas with Norway for fish stocks in their respective fisheries jurisdictions within the framework of the EU Common Fisheries Policy (EU CFP) and the Agree...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yitong Chen, Yinan Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-11-01
Series:Fishes
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2410-3888/7/6/351
_version_ 1827639718821494784
author Yitong Chen
Yinan Wang
author_facet Yitong Chen
Yinan Wang
author_sort Yitong Chen
collection DOAJ
description The North Sea fishery has maintained sound and stable cooperative management over the past four decades. European Union (EU) countries exchange quotas with Norway for fish stocks in their respective fisheries jurisdictions within the framework of the EU Common Fisheries Policy (EU CFP) and the Agreement on Fisheries between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Norway. After beginning the Brexit process with a concomitant transitional arrangement, the United Kingdom remained in the EU CFP until the end of 2020. From 2021 onward, the United Kingdom became a completely independent coastal state outside the EU CFP framework. In this context, the long-standing and stable fisheries access and quota exchange system between Norway and the EU will face tensions. The differences among the United Kingdom, the EU and Norway in fisheries also involve quotas and access to the Svalbard Protection Zone. Norway even intends to expand the fisheries conflict to the Arctic Council. To prevent the adverse consequences of conflict spillover and to achieve sustainable development of fisheries and win–win cooperation in fisheries management, the United Kingdom, the EU and Norway launched a series of actions on fisheries issues. In tripartite negotiations, each party has its advantages. Ultimately, win–win cooperation in the fisheries game is the three parties’ expected outcome.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T16:44:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-82cde02be5ff4b51b9b31b98c888f61f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2410-3888
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T16:44:06Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Fishes
spelling doaj.art-82cde02be5ff4b51b9b31b98c888f61f2023-11-24T14:48:13ZengMDPI AGFishes2410-38882022-11-017635110.3390/fishes7060351The North Sea and Svalbard Fisheries Management Regimes in the Context of Brexit: Divergence and ImplicationsYitong Chen0Yinan Wang1Law School, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, ChinaLaw School, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, ChinaThe North Sea fishery has maintained sound and stable cooperative management over the past four decades. European Union (EU) countries exchange quotas with Norway for fish stocks in their respective fisheries jurisdictions within the framework of the EU Common Fisheries Policy (EU CFP) and the Agreement on Fisheries between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Norway. After beginning the Brexit process with a concomitant transitional arrangement, the United Kingdom remained in the EU CFP until the end of 2020. From 2021 onward, the United Kingdom became a completely independent coastal state outside the EU CFP framework. In this context, the long-standing and stable fisheries access and quota exchange system between Norway and the EU will face tensions. The differences among the United Kingdom, the EU and Norway in fisheries also involve quotas and access to the Svalbard Protection Zone. Norway even intends to expand the fisheries conflict to the Arctic Council. To prevent the adverse consequences of conflict spillover and to achieve sustainable development of fisheries and win–win cooperation in fisheries management, the United Kingdom, the EU and Norway launched a series of actions on fisheries issues. In tripartite negotiations, each party has its advantages. Ultimately, win–win cooperation in the fisheries game is the three parties’ expected outcome.https://www.mdpi.com/2410-3888/7/6/351North Seafisheries managementEU Common Fisheries Policyquota systemfisheries agreementSvalbard Fisheries Protection Zone
spellingShingle Yitong Chen
Yinan Wang
The North Sea and Svalbard Fisheries Management Regimes in the Context of Brexit: Divergence and Implications
Fishes
North Sea
fisheries management
EU Common Fisheries Policy
quota system
fisheries agreement
Svalbard Fisheries Protection Zone
title The North Sea and Svalbard Fisheries Management Regimes in the Context of Brexit: Divergence and Implications
title_full The North Sea and Svalbard Fisheries Management Regimes in the Context of Brexit: Divergence and Implications
title_fullStr The North Sea and Svalbard Fisheries Management Regimes in the Context of Brexit: Divergence and Implications
title_full_unstemmed The North Sea and Svalbard Fisheries Management Regimes in the Context of Brexit: Divergence and Implications
title_short The North Sea and Svalbard Fisheries Management Regimes in the Context of Brexit: Divergence and Implications
title_sort north sea and svalbard fisheries management regimes in the context of brexit divergence and implications
topic North Sea
fisheries management
EU Common Fisheries Policy
quota system
fisheries agreement
Svalbard Fisheries Protection Zone
url https://www.mdpi.com/2410-3888/7/6/351
work_keys_str_mv AT yitongchen thenorthseaandsvalbardfisheriesmanagementregimesinthecontextofbrexitdivergenceandimplications
AT yinanwang thenorthseaandsvalbardfisheriesmanagementregimesinthecontextofbrexitdivergenceandimplications
AT yitongchen northseaandsvalbardfisheriesmanagementregimesinthecontextofbrexitdivergenceandimplications
AT yinanwang northseaandsvalbardfisheriesmanagementregimesinthecontextofbrexitdivergenceandimplications