Measuring precipitation with a geolysimeter

Using the relationship between measured groundwater pressures in deep observation wells and total surface loading, a geological weighing lysimeter (geolysimeter) has the capability of measuring precipitation event totals independently of conventional precipitation gauge observations. Correlations...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. D. Smith, G. van der Kamp, L. Arnold, R. Schmidt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2017-10-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/21/5263/2017/hess-21-5263-2017.pdf
_version_ 1811241401301598208
author C. D. Smith
G. van der Kamp
L. Arnold
R. Schmidt
author_facet C. D. Smith
G. van der Kamp
L. Arnold
R. Schmidt
author_sort C. D. Smith
collection DOAJ
description Using the relationship between measured groundwater pressures in deep observation wells and total surface loading, a geological weighing lysimeter (geolysimeter) has the capability of measuring precipitation event totals independently of conventional precipitation gauge observations. Correlations between groundwater pressure change and event precipitation were observed at a co-located site near Duck Lake, SK, over a multi-year and multi-season period. Correlation coefficients (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup>) varied from 0.99 for rainfall to 0.94 for snowfall. The geolysimeter was shown to underestimate rainfall by 7 % while overestimating snowfall by 9 % as compared to the unadjusted gauge precipitation. It is speculated that the underestimation of rainfall is due to unmeasured run-off and evapotranspiration within the response area of the geolysimeter during larger rainfall events, while the overestimation of snow is at least partially due to the systematic undercatch common to most precipitation gauges due to wind. Using recently developed transfer functions from the World Meteorological Organization's (WMO) Solid Precipitation Intercomparison Experiment (SPICE), bias adjustments were applied to the Alter-shielded, Geonor T-200B precipitation gauge measurements of snowfall to mitigate wind-induced errors. The bias between the gauge and geolysimeter measurements was reduced to 3 %. This suggests that the geolysimeter is capable of accurately measuring solid precipitation and can be used as an independent and representative reference of true precipitation.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T13:34:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-82d964a6d4f34abaabb06e2ce17d5390
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T13:34:42Z
publishDate 2017-10-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
spelling doaj.art-82d964a6d4f34abaabb06e2ce17d53902022-12-22T03:31:02ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382017-10-01215263527210.5194/hess-21-5263-2017Measuring precipitation with a geolysimeterC. D. Smith0G. van der Kamp1L. Arnold2R. Schmidt3Environment and Climate Change Canada, Climate Research Division, Saskatoon, S7N 3H5, CanadaEnvironment and Climate Change Canada, Watershed Hydrology and Ecology Research Division, Saskatoon, S7N 3H5, CanadaEnvironment and Climate Change Canada, Climate Research Division, Saskatoon, S7N 3H5, CanadaEnvironment and Climate Change Canada, Watershed Hydrology and Ecology Research Division, Saskatoon, S7N 3H5, CanadaUsing the relationship between measured groundwater pressures in deep observation wells and total surface loading, a geological weighing lysimeter (geolysimeter) has the capability of measuring precipitation event totals independently of conventional precipitation gauge observations. Correlations between groundwater pressure change and event precipitation were observed at a co-located site near Duck Lake, SK, over a multi-year and multi-season period. Correlation coefficients (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup>) varied from 0.99 for rainfall to 0.94 for snowfall. The geolysimeter was shown to underestimate rainfall by 7 % while overestimating snowfall by 9 % as compared to the unadjusted gauge precipitation. It is speculated that the underestimation of rainfall is due to unmeasured run-off and evapotranspiration within the response area of the geolysimeter during larger rainfall events, while the overestimation of snow is at least partially due to the systematic undercatch common to most precipitation gauges due to wind. Using recently developed transfer functions from the World Meteorological Organization's (WMO) Solid Precipitation Intercomparison Experiment (SPICE), bias adjustments were applied to the Alter-shielded, Geonor T-200B precipitation gauge measurements of snowfall to mitigate wind-induced errors. The bias between the gauge and geolysimeter measurements was reduced to 3 %. This suggests that the geolysimeter is capable of accurately measuring solid precipitation and can be used as an independent and representative reference of true precipitation.https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/21/5263/2017/hess-21-5263-2017.pdf
spellingShingle C. D. Smith
G. van der Kamp
L. Arnold
R. Schmidt
Measuring precipitation with a geolysimeter
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
title Measuring precipitation with a geolysimeter
title_full Measuring precipitation with a geolysimeter
title_fullStr Measuring precipitation with a geolysimeter
title_full_unstemmed Measuring precipitation with a geolysimeter
title_short Measuring precipitation with a geolysimeter
title_sort measuring precipitation with a geolysimeter
url https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/21/5263/2017/hess-21-5263-2017.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT cdsmith measuringprecipitationwithageolysimeter
AT gvanderkamp measuringprecipitationwithageolysimeter
AT larnold measuringprecipitationwithageolysimeter
AT rschmidt measuringprecipitationwithageolysimeter