Impact of intrafraction changes in delivered dose of the day for prostate cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy via MR-Linac
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of intrafraction pelvic motion by comparing the adapted plan dose (APD) and the computed delivered dose of the day (DDOTD) for patients with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with SBRT on the MR-Linac. Methods: Twenty patients with PCa treated...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2022-09-01
|
| Series: | Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632422000257 |
| _version_ | 1828419050205609984 |
|---|---|
| author | Jennifer Dang Vickie Kong Winnie Li Inmaculada Navarro Jeff D. Winter Victor Malkov Alejandro Berlin Charles Catton Jerusha Padayachee Srinivas Raman Padraig Warde Peter Chung |
| author_facet | Jennifer Dang Vickie Kong Winnie Li Inmaculada Navarro Jeff D. Winter Victor Malkov Alejandro Berlin Charles Catton Jerusha Padayachee Srinivas Raman Padraig Warde Peter Chung |
| author_sort | Jennifer Dang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of intrafraction pelvic motion by comparing the adapted plan dose (APD) and the computed delivered dose of the day (DDOTD) for patients with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with SBRT on the MR-Linac. Methods: Twenty patients with PCa treated with MR-guided adaptive SBRT were included. A 9-field IMRT distribution was adapted based on the anatomy of the day to deliver a total prescription dose of 3000 cGy in 5 fractions to the prostate plus a 5 mm isotropic margin. Prostate, bladder, and rectum were re-contoured on the MR-image acquired during treatment delivery (MRBO). DDOTD was computed by propagating the dose from the daily adapted plan generated during treatment onto the MRBO. Results: Target coverage was met for all fractions, however, computed DDOTD was significantly less than the APD (p < 0.05). During an average treatment of 53 min, mean bladder volume increased by 116%, which led to a significant decrease in the DDOTD bladder D40% (p < 0.001). However, DDOTD to bladder 5 cc was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than APD. Rectum intrafraction changes were observed based on a volume change of −20% to 83% and presence of significant dose changes from APD to DDOTD for rectum D20% (p < 0.05) and D1cc (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Intrafraction motion observed during prostate SBRT treatment on the MR-Linac have dosimetric impacts on both the target and organs at risk. Post-treatment computation using DDOTD may inform adaptation beyond anatomic changes in subsequent treatment fractions to best capitalize on MR-Linac technology and widen the therapeutic index of SBRT for PCa. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-10T14:45:53Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-82e83e5f7eb545ba8c797d77c30c46f7 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2405-6324 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-10T14:45:53Z |
| publishDate | 2022-09-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology |
| spelling | doaj.art-82e83e5f7eb545ba8c797d77c30c46f72022-12-22T01:44:34ZengElsevierTechnical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology2405-63242022-09-01234146Impact of intrafraction changes in delivered dose of the day for prostate cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy via MR-LinacJennifer Dang0Vickie Kong1Winnie Li2Inmaculada Navarro3Jeff D. Winter4Victor Malkov5Alejandro Berlin6Charles Catton7Jerusha Padayachee8Srinivas Raman9Padraig Warde10Peter Chung11Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Corresponding author at: Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, Canada.Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, CanadaRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaPurpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of intrafraction pelvic motion by comparing the adapted plan dose (APD) and the computed delivered dose of the day (DDOTD) for patients with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with SBRT on the MR-Linac. Methods: Twenty patients with PCa treated with MR-guided adaptive SBRT were included. A 9-field IMRT distribution was adapted based on the anatomy of the day to deliver a total prescription dose of 3000 cGy in 5 fractions to the prostate plus a 5 mm isotropic margin. Prostate, bladder, and rectum were re-contoured on the MR-image acquired during treatment delivery (MRBO). DDOTD was computed by propagating the dose from the daily adapted plan generated during treatment onto the MRBO. Results: Target coverage was met for all fractions, however, computed DDOTD was significantly less than the APD (p < 0.05). During an average treatment of 53 min, mean bladder volume increased by 116%, which led to a significant decrease in the DDOTD bladder D40% (p < 0.001). However, DDOTD to bladder 5 cc was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than APD. Rectum intrafraction changes were observed based on a volume change of −20% to 83% and presence of significant dose changes from APD to DDOTD for rectum D20% (p < 0.05) and D1cc (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Intrafraction motion observed during prostate SBRT treatment on the MR-Linac have dosimetric impacts on both the target and organs at risk. Post-treatment computation using DDOTD may inform adaptation beyond anatomic changes in subsequent treatment fractions to best capitalize on MR-Linac technology and widen the therapeutic index of SBRT for PCa.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632422000257Intra-fraction motionAdaptive radiotherapyDDOTDMR-LinacProstate SBRT |
| spellingShingle | Jennifer Dang Vickie Kong Winnie Li Inmaculada Navarro Jeff D. Winter Victor Malkov Alejandro Berlin Charles Catton Jerusha Padayachee Srinivas Raman Padraig Warde Peter Chung Impact of intrafraction changes in delivered dose of the day for prostate cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy via MR-Linac Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology Intra-fraction motion Adaptive radiotherapy DDOTD MR-Linac Prostate SBRT |
| title | Impact of intrafraction changes in delivered dose of the day for prostate cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy via MR-Linac |
| title_full | Impact of intrafraction changes in delivered dose of the day for prostate cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy via MR-Linac |
| title_fullStr | Impact of intrafraction changes in delivered dose of the day for prostate cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy via MR-Linac |
| title_full_unstemmed | Impact of intrafraction changes in delivered dose of the day for prostate cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy via MR-Linac |
| title_short | Impact of intrafraction changes in delivered dose of the day for prostate cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy via MR-Linac |
| title_sort | impact of intrafraction changes in delivered dose of the day for prostate cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy via mr linac |
| topic | Intra-fraction motion Adaptive radiotherapy DDOTD MR-Linac Prostate SBRT |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632422000257 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jenniferdang impactofintrafractionchangesindelivereddoseofthedayforprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiotherapyviamrlinac AT vickiekong impactofintrafractionchangesindelivereddoseofthedayforprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiotherapyviamrlinac AT winnieli impactofintrafractionchangesindelivereddoseofthedayforprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiotherapyviamrlinac AT inmaculadanavarro impactofintrafractionchangesindelivereddoseofthedayforprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiotherapyviamrlinac AT jeffdwinter impactofintrafractionchangesindelivereddoseofthedayforprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiotherapyviamrlinac AT victormalkov impactofintrafractionchangesindelivereddoseofthedayforprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiotherapyviamrlinac AT alejandroberlin impactofintrafractionchangesindelivereddoseofthedayforprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiotherapyviamrlinac AT charlescatton impactofintrafractionchangesindelivereddoseofthedayforprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiotherapyviamrlinac AT jerushapadayachee impactofintrafractionchangesindelivereddoseofthedayforprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiotherapyviamrlinac AT srinivasraman impactofintrafractionchangesindelivereddoseofthedayforprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiotherapyviamrlinac AT padraigwarde impactofintrafractionchangesindelivereddoseofthedayforprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiotherapyviamrlinac AT peterchung impactofintrafractionchangesindelivereddoseofthedayforprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiotherapyviamrlinac |