Predictive Equations Overestimate Resting Metabolic Rate in Young Chilean Women with Excess Body Fat

Underestimating/overestimating resting metabolic rate (RMR) affects energy prescription. The objective was to compare RMR by indirect calorimetry (RMR IC) and RMR estimated by predictive equations in women with excess body fat. This was an analytical cross-sectional study with 41 women aged 18–28 wi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eduard Maury-Sintjago, Alejandra Rodríguez-Fernández, Marcela Ruíz-De la Fuente
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-01-01
Series:Metabolites
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/13/2/188
_version_ 1797619381281226752
author Eduard Maury-Sintjago
Alejandra Rodríguez-Fernández
Marcela Ruíz-De la Fuente
author_facet Eduard Maury-Sintjago
Alejandra Rodríguez-Fernández
Marcela Ruíz-De la Fuente
author_sort Eduard Maury-Sintjago
collection DOAJ
description Underestimating/overestimating resting metabolic rate (RMR) affects energy prescription. The objective was to compare RMR by indirect calorimetry (RMR IC) and RMR estimated by predictive equations in women with excess body fat. This was an analytical cross-sectional study with 41 women aged 18–28 with overnutrition according to body composition. The RMR IC was measured and RMR estimated using the FAO/WHO/UNU (1985), FAO/WHO/UNU (2004), Harris–Benedict, and Mifflin–St Jeor equations. The percentage of adequacy (90–110%), overestimation (>110%), and underestimation (<90%) were evaluated for RMR IC. Data were described by percentiles because of non-normal distribution according to the Shapiro–Wilk test. The Kruskal–Wallis test and Bland–Altman analysis were applied at a significance level of α < 0.05. The RMR IC was 1192 and 1183 calories/day (<i>p</i> = 0.429) in women with obesity and overweight, respectively. The FAO/WHO/UNU (1985), FAO/WHO/UNU (2004), Harris–Benedict, and Mifflin–St Jeor equations overestimated the RMR IC by 283.2, 311.2, 292.7, and 203.0 calories/day and by 296.7, 413.8, 280.0, and 176.6 calories/day for women with overweight and obesity (<i>p</i> < 0.001), respectively. The Harris–Benedict adjusted weight (0.5) equation underestimated RMR IC by 254.7 calories/day. The predictive equations overestimated RMR IC in women with excess body fat. The Mifflin–St Jeor equation showed less overestimation and better adequacy, but was not exempt from inaccuracy.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T08:26:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-82f6d49a4ad04f62bb0cc1825f16f63b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2218-1989
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T08:26:22Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Metabolites
spelling doaj.art-82f6d49a4ad04f62bb0cc1825f16f63b2023-11-16T22:04:07ZengMDPI AGMetabolites2218-19892023-01-0113218810.3390/metabo13020188Predictive Equations Overestimate Resting Metabolic Rate in Young Chilean Women with Excess Body FatEduard Maury-Sintjago0Alejandra Rodríguez-Fernández1Marcela Ruíz-De la Fuente2Department of Nutrition and Public Health, Universidad del Bío-Bío, Chillan 3780000, ChileDepartment of Nutrition and Public Health, Universidad del Bío-Bío, Chillan 3780000, ChileDepartment of Nutrition and Public Health, Universidad del Bío-Bío, Chillan 3780000, ChileUnderestimating/overestimating resting metabolic rate (RMR) affects energy prescription. The objective was to compare RMR by indirect calorimetry (RMR IC) and RMR estimated by predictive equations in women with excess body fat. This was an analytical cross-sectional study with 41 women aged 18–28 with overnutrition according to body composition. The RMR IC was measured and RMR estimated using the FAO/WHO/UNU (1985), FAO/WHO/UNU (2004), Harris–Benedict, and Mifflin–St Jeor equations. The percentage of adequacy (90–110%), overestimation (>110%), and underestimation (<90%) were evaluated for RMR IC. Data were described by percentiles because of non-normal distribution according to the Shapiro–Wilk test. The Kruskal–Wallis test and Bland–Altman analysis were applied at a significance level of α < 0.05. The RMR IC was 1192 and 1183 calories/day (<i>p</i> = 0.429) in women with obesity and overweight, respectively. The FAO/WHO/UNU (1985), FAO/WHO/UNU (2004), Harris–Benedict, and Mifflin–St Jeor equations overestimated the RMR IC by 283.2, 311.2, 292.7, and 203.0 calories/day and by 296.7, 413.8, 280.0, and 176.6 calories/day for women with overweight and obesity (<i>p</i> < 0.001), respectively. The Harris–Benedict adjusted weight (0.5) equation underestimated RMR IC by 254.7 calories/day. The predictive equations overestimated RMR IC in women with excess body fat. The Mifflin–St Jeor equation showed less overestimation and better adequacy, but was not exempt from inaccuracy.https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/13/2/188resting metabolic ratepredictive equationsindirect calorimetrywomenbody fat
spellingShingle Eduard Maury-Sintjago
Alejandra Rodríguez-Fernández
Marcela Ruíz-De la Fuente
Predictive Equations Overestimate Resting Metabolic Rate in Young Chilean Women with Excess Body Fat
Metabolites
resting metabolic rate
predictive equations
indirect calorimetry
women
body fat
title Predictive Equations Overestimate Resting Metabolic Rate in Young Chilean Women with Excess Body Fat
title_full Predictive Equations Overestimate Resting Metabolic Rate in Young Chilean Women with Excess Body Fat
title_fullStr Predictive Equations Overestimate Resting Metabolic Rate in Young Chilean Women with Excess Body Fat
title_full_unstemmed Predictive Equations Overestimate Resting Metabolic Rate in Young Chilean Women with Excess Body Fat
title_short Predictive Equations Overestimate Resting Metabolic Rate in Young Chilean Women with Excess Body Fat
title_sort predictive equations overestimate resting metabolic rate in young chilean women with excess body fat
topic resting metabolic rate
predictive equations
indirect calorimetry
women
body fat
url https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/13/2/188
work_keys_str_mv AT eduardmaurysintjago predictiveequationsoverestimaterestingmetabolicrateinyoungchileanwomenwithexcessbodyfat
AT alejandrarodriguezfernandez predictiveequationsoverestimaterestingmetabolicrateinyoungchileanwomenwithexcessbodyfat
AT marcelaruizdelafuente predictiveequationsoverestimaterestingmetabolicrateinyoungchileanwomenwithexcessbodyfat