Continental vs. Global Niche-Based Modelling of Freshwater Species’ Distributions: How Big Are the Differences in the Estimated Climate Change Effects?

Thermal response curves that depict the probability of occurrence along a thermal gradient are used to derive various species’ thermal properties and abilities to cope with warming. However, different thermal responses can be expected for different portions of a species range. We focus on difference...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Danijela Markovic, Jörg Freyhof, Oskar Kärcher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/6/816
_version_ 1797541123299737600
author Danijela Markovic
Jörg Freyhof
Oskar Kärcher
author_facet Danijela Markovic
Jörg Freyhof
Oskar Kärcher
author_sort Danijela Markovic
collection DOAJ
description Thermal response curves that depict the probability of occurrence along a thermal gradient are used to derive various species’ thermal properties and abilities to cope with warming. However, different thermal responses can be expected for different portions of a species range. We focus on differences in thermal response curves (TRCs) and thermal niche requirements for four freshwater fishes (<i>Coregonus sardinella</i>, <i>Pungitius pungitius</i>, <i>Rutilus rutilus</i>, <i>Salvelinus alpinus</i>) native to Europe at (1) the global and (2) European continental scale. European ranges captured only a portion of the global thermal range with major differences in the minimum (T<sub>min</sub>), maximum (T<sub>max</sub>) and average temperature (T<sub>av</sub>) of the respective distributions. Further investigations of the model-derived preferred temperature (T<sub>pref</sub>), warming tolerance (WT = T<sub>max</sub> − T<sub>pref</sub>), safety margin (SM = T<sub>pref</sub> − T<sub>av</sub>) and the future climatic impact showed substantially differing results. All considered thermal properties either were under- or overestimated at the European level. Our results highlight that, although continental analyses have an impressive spatial extent, they might deliver misleading estimates of species thermal niches and future climate change impacts, if they do not cover the full species ranges. Studies and management actions should therefore favor whole global range distribution data for analyzing species responses to environmental gradients.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T13:11:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-830251b87c7d41038ec3a5d2562cebb3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4441
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T13:11:43Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Water
spelling doaj.art-830251b87c7d41038ec3a5d2562cebb32023-11-21T10:44:51ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412021-03-0113681610.3390/w13060816Continental vs. Global Niche-Based Modelling of Freshwater Species’ Distributions: How Big Are the Differences in the Estimated Climate Change Effects?Danijela Markovic0Jörg Freyhof1Oskar Kärcher2Faculty of Business Management and Social Sciences, Osnabrück University of Applied Sciences, Caprivistr. 30A, 49076 Osnabrück, GermanyMuseum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Invalidenstraße 43, 10115 Berlin, GermanyFaculty of Business Management and Social Sciences, Osnabrück University of Applied Sciences, Caprivistr. 30A, 49076 Osnabrück, GermanyThermal response curves that depict the probability of occurrence along a thermal gradient are used to derive various species’ thermal properties and abilities to cope with warming. However, different thermal responses can be expected for different portions of a species range. We focus on differences in thermal response curves (TRCs) and thermal niche requirements for four freshwater fishes (<i>Coregonus sardinella</i>, <i>Pungitius pungitius</i>, <i>Rutilus rutilus</i>, <i>Salvelinus alpinus</i>) native to Europe at (1) the global and (2) European continental scale. European ranges captured only a portion of the global thermal range with major differences in the minimum (T<sub>min</sub>), maximum (T<sub>max</sub>) and average temperature (T<sub>av</sub>) of the respective distributions. Further investigations of the model-derived preferred temperature (T<sub>pref</sub>), warming tolerance (WT = T<sub>max</sub> − T<sub>pref</sub>), safety margin (SM = T<sub>pref</sub> − T<sub>av</sub>) and the future climatic impact showed substantially differing results. All considered thermal properties either were under- or overestimated at the European level. Our results highlight that, although continental analyses have an impressive spatial extent, they might deliver misleading estimates of species thermal niches and future climate change impacts, if they do not cover the full species ranges. Studies and management actions should therefore favor whole global range distribution data for analyzing species responses to environmental gradients.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/6/816freshwaterpreferred temperatureclimate changesafety marginthermal response curveswarming tolerance
spellingShingle Danijela Markovic
Jörg Freyhof
Oskar Kärcher
Continental vs. Global Niche-Based Modelling of Freshwater Species’ Distributions: How Big Are the Differences in the Estimated Climate Change Effects?
Water
freshwater
preferred temperature
climate change
safety margin
thermal response curves
warming tolerance
title Continental vs. Global Niche-Based Modelling of Freshwater Species’ Distributions: How Big Are the Differences in the Estimated Climate Change Effects?
title_full Continental vs. Global Niche-Based Modelling of Freshwater Species’ Distributions: How Big Are the Differences in the Estimated Climate Change Effects?
title_fullStr Continental vs. Global Niche-Based Modelling of Freshwater Species’ Distributions: How Big Are the Differences in the Estimated Climate Change Effects?
title_full_unstemmed Continental vs. Global Niche-Based Modelling of Freshwater Species’ Distributions: How Big Are the Differences in the Estimated Climate Change Effects?
title_short Continental vs. Global Niche-Based Modelling of Freshwater Species’ Distributions: How Big Are the Differences in the Estimated Climate Change Effects?
title_sort continental vs global niche based modelling of freshwater species distributions how big are the differences in the estimated climate change effects
topic freshwater
preferred temperature
climate change
safety margin
thermal response curves
warming tolerance
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/6/816
work_keys_str_mv AT danijelamarkovic continentalvsglobalnichebasedmodellingoffreshwaterspeciesdistributionshowbigarethedifferencesintheestimatedclimatechangeeffects
AT jorgfreyhof continentalvsglobalnichebasedmodellingoffreshwaterspeciesdistributionshowbigarethedifferencesintheestimatedclimatechangeeffects
AT oskarkarcher continentalvsglobalnichebasedmodellingoffreshwaterspeciesdistributionshowbigarethedifferencesintheestimatedclimatechangeeffects