How Should One Write about Masters?
The aim of the paper is to answer the question: how should one write about masters? It is a question about the narrative strategies of authors writing about masters. The presented analysis is based on five examples: (1) John A. Hall’s Ernest Gellner: An Intellectual Biography, (2) Anita Burdman Fefe...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Lodz University Press
2019-06-01
|
Series: | Nauki o Wychowaniu |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/wychow/article/view/6069 |
_version_ | 1818980983491264512 |
---|---|
author | Adam F. Kola |
author_facet | Adam F. Kola |
author_sort | Adam F. Kola |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The aim of the paper is to answer the question: how should one write about masters? It is a question about the narrative strategies of authors writing about masters. The presented analysis is based on five examples: (1) John A. Hall’s Ernest Gellner: An Intellectual Biography, (2) Anita Burdman Feferman and Solomon Feferman’s Alfred Tarski: Life and Logic, (3) Edmund Leach’s Lévi-Strauss, (4) Andrzej Walicki’s Idee i ludzie. Próba autobiografii [Ideas and People. An Attempt at an Autobiography], and (5) Dialogues by Roman Jakobson and Krystyna Pomorska. Each text presents different rhetorical devices, authorial relations to the master, and academic aims. The paper concludes with a critical comparison of the five examples (with the addition of some other minor cases also discussed in the paper). |
first_indexed | 2024-12-20T17:24:05Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-830e53b4958643159d626cb59c91614c |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2450-4491 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-20T17:24:05Z |
publishDate | 2019-06-01 |
publisher | Lodz University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Nauki o Wychowaniu |
spelling | doaj.art-830e53b4958643159d626cb59c91614c2022-12-21T19:31:39ZengLodz University PressNauki o Wychowaniu2450-44912019-06-0181708910.18778/2450-4491.08.066069How Should One Write about Masters?Adam F. Kola0Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, University of Chicago, Visiting ScholarThe aim of the paper is to answer the question: how should one write about masters? It is a question about the narrative strategies of authors writing about masters. The presented analysis is based on five examples: (1) John A. Hall’s Ernest Gellner: An Intellectual Biography, (2) Anita Burdman Feferman and Solomon Feferman’s Alfred Tarski: Life and Logic, (3) Edmund Leach’s Lévi-Strauss, (4) Andrzej Walicki’s Idee i ludzie. Próba autobiografii [Ideas and People. An Attempt at an Autobiography], and (5) Dialogues by Roman Jakobson and Krystyna Pomorska. Each text presents different rhetorical devices, authorial relations to the master, and academic aims. The paper concludes with a critical comparison of the five examples (with the addition of some other minor cases also discussed in the paper).https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/wychow/article/view/6069mastermasterystudentmaster-disciple relationandrzej de lazariernest gellneralfred tarskiclaude lévi-straussandrzej walickiroman jakobsonrhetoricnarration |
spellingShingle | Adam F. Kola How Should One Write about Masters? Nauki o Wychowaniu master mastery student master-disciple relation andrzej de lazari ernest gellner alfred tarski claude lévi-strauss andrzej walicki roman jakobson rhetoric narration |
title | How Should One Write about Masters? |
title_full | How Should One Write about Masters? |
title_fullStr | How Should One Write about Masters? |
title_full_unstemmed | How Should One Write about Masters? |
title_short | How Should One Write about Masters? |
title_sort | how should one write about masters |
topic | master mastery student master-disciple relation andrzej de lazari ernest gellner alfred tarski claude lévi-strauss andrzej walicki roman jakobson rhetoric narration |
url | https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/wychow/article/view/6069 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adamfkola howshouldonewriteaboutmasters |