Global emission estimates and radiative impact of C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub>, C<sub>5</sub>F<sub>12</sub>, C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>14</sub>, C<sub>7</sub>F<sub>16</sub> and C<sub>8</sub>F<sub>18</sub>

Global emission estimates based on new atmospheric observations are presented for the acylic high molecular weight perfluorocarbons (PFCs): decafluorobutane (C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub>), dodecafluoropentane (C<sub>5</sub>F<sub>12</sub>), tetradecafluo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. G. Prinn, J. B. Burkholder, M. Baasandorj, M. Rigby, D. J. Ivy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2012-08-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/7635/2012/acp-12-7635-2012.pdf
_version_ 1818550143064997888
author R. G. Prinn
J. B. Burkholder
M. Baasandorj
M. Rigby
D. J. Ivy
author_facet R. G. Prinn
J. B. Burkholder
M. Baasandorj
M. Rigby
D. J. Ivy
author_sort R. G. Prinn
collection DOAJ
description Global emission estimates based on new atmospheric observations are presented for the acylic high molecular weight perfluorocarbons (PFCs): decafluorobutane (C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub>), dodecafluoropentane (C<sub>5</sub>F<sub>12</sub>), tetradecafluorohexane (C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>14</sub>), hexadecafluoroheptane (C<sub>7</sub>F<sub>16</sub>) and octadecafluorooctane (C<sub>8</sub>F<sub>18</sub>). Emissions are estimated using a 3-dimensional chemical transport model and an inverse method that includes a growth constraint on emissions. The observations used in the inversion are based on newly measured archived air samples that cover a 39-yr period, from 1973 to 2011, and include 36 Northern Hemispheric and 46 Southern Hemispheric samples. The derived emission estimates show that global emission rates were largest in the 1980s and 1990s for C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub> and C<sub>5</sub>F<sub>12</sub>, and in the 1990s for C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>14</sub>, C<sub>7</sub>F<sub>16</sub> and C<sub>8</sub>F<sub>18</sub>. After a subsequent decline, emissions have remained relatively stable, within 20%, for the last 5 yr. Bottom-up emission estimates are available from the Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research version 4.2 (EDGARv4.2) for C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub>, C<sub>5</sub>F<sub>12</sub>, C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>14</sub> and C<sub>7</sub>F<sub>16</sub>, and inventories of C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub>, C<sub>5</sub>F<sub>12</sub> and C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>14</sub> are reported to the United Nations' Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) by Annex 1 countries that have ratified the Kyoto Protocol. The atmospheric measurement-based emission estimates are 20 times larger than EDGARv4.2 for C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub> and over three orders of magnitude larger for C<sub>5</sub>F<sub>12</sub> (with 2008 EDGARv4.2 estimates for C<sub>5</sub>F<sub>12</sub> at 9.6 kg yr<sup>−1</sup>, as compared to 67±53 t yr<sup>−1</sup> as derived in this study). The derived emission estimates for C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>14</sub> largely agree with the bottom-up estimates from EDGARv4.2. Moreover, the C<sub>7</sub>F<sub>16</sub> emission estimates are comparable to those of EDGARv4.2 at their peak in the 1990s, albeit significant underestimation for the other time periods. There are no bottom-up emission estimates for C<sub>8</sub>F<sub>18</sub>, thus the emission rates reported here are the first for C<sub>8</sub>F<sub>18</sub>. The reported inventories for C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub>, C<sub>5</sub>F<sub>12</sub> and C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>14</sub> to UNFCCC are five to ten times lower than those estimated in this study. <br><br> In addition, we present measured infrared absorption spectra for C<sub>7</sub>F<sub>16</sub> and C<sub>8</sub>F<sub>18</sub>, and estimate their radiative efficiencies and global warming potentials (GWPs). We find that C<sub>8</sub>F<sub>18</sub>'s radiative efficiency is similar to trifluoromethyl sulfur pentafluoride's (SF<sub>5</sub>F<sub>3</sub>) at 0.57 W m<sup>−2</sup> ppb<sup>−1</sup>, which is the highest radiative efficiency of any measured atmospheric species. Using the 100-yr time horizon GWPs, the total radiative impact of the high molecular weight perfluorocarbons emissions are also estimated; we find the high molecular weight PFCs peak contribution was in 1997 at 24 000 Gg of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) equivalents and has decreased by a factor of three to 7300 Gg of CO<sub>2</sub> equivalents in 2010. This 2010 cumulative emission rate for the high molecular weight PFCs is comparable to: 0.02% of the total CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, 0.81% of the total hydrofluorocarbon emissions, or 1.07% of the total chlorofluorocarbon emissions projected for 2010 (Velders et al., 2009). In terms of the total PFC emission budget, including the lower molecular weight PFCs, the high molecular weight PFCs peak contribution was also in 1997 at 15.4% and was 6% of the total PFC emissions in CO<sub>2</sub> equivalents in 2009.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T08:42:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8323afd0bc5c4cfd926b0d63dcc3a3e4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T08:42:31Z
publishDate 2012-08-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
spelling doaj.art-8323afd0bc5c4cfd926b0d63dcc3a3e42022-12-22T00:30:42ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242012-08-0112167635764510.5194/acp-12-7635-2012Global emission estimates and radiative impact of C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub>, C<sub>5</sub>F<sub>12</sub>, C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>14</sub>, C<sub>7</sub>F<sub>16</sub> and C<sub>8</sub>F<sub>18</sub>R. G. PrinnJ. B. BurkholderM. BaasandorjM. RigbyD. J. IvyGlobal emission estimates based on new atmospheric observations are presented for the acylic high molecular weight perfluorocarbons (PFCs): decafluorobutane (C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub>), dodecafluoropentane (C<sub>5</sub>F<sub>12</sub>), tetradecafluorohexane (C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>14</sub>), hexadecafluoroheptane (C<sub>7</sub>F<sub>16</sub>) and octadecafluorooctane (C<sub>8</sub>F<sub>18</sub>). Emissions are estimated using a 3-dimensional chemical transport model and an inverse method that includes a growth constraint on emissions. The observations used in the inversion are based on newly measured archived air samples that cover a 39-yr period, from 1973 to 2011, and include 36 Northern Hemispheric and 46 Southern Hemispheric samples. The derived emission estimates show that global emission rates were largest in the 1980s and 1990s for C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub> and C<sub>5</sub>F<sub>12</sub>, and in the 1990s for C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>14</sub>, C<sub>7</sub>F<sub>16</sub> and C<sub>8</sub>F<sub>18</sub>. After a subsequent decline, emissions have remained relatively stable, within 20%, for the last 5 yr. Bottom-up emission estimates are available from the Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research version 4.2 (EDGARv4.2) for C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub>, C<sub>5</sub>F<sub>12</sub>, C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>14</sub> and C<sub>7</sub>F<sub>16</sub>, and inventories of C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub>, C<sub>5</sub>F<sub>12</sub> and C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>14</sub> are reported to the United Nations' Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) by Annex 1 countries that have ratified the Kyoto Protocol. The atmospheric measurement-based emission estimates are 20 times larger than EDGARv4.2 for C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub> and over three orders of magnitude larger for C<sub>5</sub>F<sub>12</sub> (with 2008 EDGARv4.2 estimates for C<sub>5</sub>F<sub>12</sub> at 9.6 kg yr<sup>−1</sup>, as compared to 67±53 t yr<sup>−1</sup> as derived in this study). The derived emission estimates for C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>14</sub> largely agree with the bottom-up estimates from EDGARv4.2. Moreover, the C<sub>7</sub>F<sub>16</sub> emission estimates are comparable to those of EDGARv4.2 at their peak in the 1990s, albeit significant underestimation for the other time periods. There are no bottom-up emission estimates for C<sub>8</sub>F<sub>18</sub>, thus the emission rates reported here are the first for C<sub>8</sub>F<sub>18</sub>. The reported inventories for C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub>, C<sub>5</sub>F<sub>12</sub> and C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>14</sub> to UNFCCC are five to ten times lower than those estimated in this study. <br><br> In addition, we present measured infrared absorption spectra for C<sub>7</sub>F<sub>16</sub> and C<sub>8</sub>F<sub>18</sub>, and estimate their radiative efficiencies and global warming potentials (GWPs). We find that C<sub>8</sub>F<sub>18</sub>'s radiative efficiency is similar to trifluoromethyl sulfur pentafluoride's (SF<sub>5</sub>F<sub>3</sub>) at 0.57 W m<sup>−2</sup> ppb<sup>−1</sup>, which is the highest radiative efficiency of any measured atmospheric species. Using the 100-yr time horizon GWPs, the total radiative impact of the high molecular weight perfluorocarbons emissions are also estimated; we find the high molecular weight PFCs peak contribution was in 1997 at 24 000 Gg of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) equivalents and has decreased by a factor of three to 7300 Gg of CO<sub>2</sub> equivalents in 2010. This 2010 cumulative emission rate for the high molecular weight PFCs is comparable to: 0.02% of the total CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, 0.81% of the total hydrofluorocarbon emissions, or 1.07% of the total chlorofluorocarbon emissions projected for 2010 (Velders et al., 2009). In terms of the total PFC emission budget, including the lower molecular weight PFCs, the high molecular weight PFCs peak contribution was also in 1997 at 15.4% and was 6% of the total PFC emissions in CO<sub>2</sub> equivalents in 2009.http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/7635/2012/acp-12-7635-2012.pdf
spellingShingle R. G. Prinn
J. B. Burkholder
M. Baasandorj
M. Rigby
D. J. Ivy
Global emission estimates and radiative impact of C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub>, C<sub>5</sub>F<sub>12</sub>, C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>14</sub>, C<sub>7</sub>F<sub>16</sub> and C<sub>8</sub>F<sub>18</sub>
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
title Global emission estimates and radiative impact of C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub>, C<sub>5</sub>F<sub>12</sub>, C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>14</sub>, C<sub>7</sub>F<sub>16</sub> and C<sub>8</sub>F<sub>18</sub>
title_full Global emission estimates and radiative impact of C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub>, C<sub>5</sub>F<sub>12</sub>, C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>14</sub>, C<sub>7</sub>F<sub>16</sub> and C<sub>8</sub>F<sub>18</sub>
title_fullStr Global emission estimates and radiative impact of C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub>, C<sub>5</sub>F<sub>12</sub>, C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>14</sub>, C<sub>7</sub>F<sub>16</sub> and C<sub>8</sub>F<sub>18</sub>
title_full_unstemmed Global emission estimates and radiative impact of C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub>, C<sub>5</sub>F<sub>12</sub>, C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>14</sub>, C<sub>7</sub>F<sub>16</sub> and C<sub>8</sub>F<sub>18</sub>
title_short Global emission estimates and radiative impact of C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub>, C<sub>5</sub>F<sub>12</sub>, C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>14</sub>, C<sub>7</sub>F<sub>16</sub> and C<sub>8</sub>F<sub>18</sub>
title_sort global emission estimates and radiative impact of c sub 4 sub f sub 10 sub c sub 5 sub f sub 12 sub c sub 6 sub f sub 14 sub c sub 7 sub f sub 16 sub and c sub 8 sub f sub 18 sub
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/7635/2012/acp-12-7635-2012.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT rgprinn globalemissionestimatesandradiativeimpactofcsub4subfsub10subcsub5subfsub12subcsub6subfsub14subcsub7subfsub16subandcsub8subfsub18sub
AT jbburkholder globalemissionestimatesandradiativeimpactofcsub4subfsub10subcsub5subfsub12subcsub6subfsub14subcsub7subfsub16subandcsub8subfsub18sub
AT mbaasandorj globalemissionestimatesandradiativeimpactofcsub4subfsub10subcsub5subfsub12subcsub6subfsub14subcsub7subfsub16subandcsub8subfsub18sub
AT mrigby globalemissionestimatesandradiativeimpactofcsub4subfsub10subcsub5subfsub12subcsub6subfsub14subcsub7subfsub16subandcsub8subfsub18sub
AT djivy globalemissionestimatesandradiativeimpactofcsub4subfsub10subcsub5subfsub12subcsub6subfsub14subcsub7subfsub16subandcsub8subfsub18sub