A comparative study of onlay and retrorectus mesh placement in incisional hernia repair

Introduction: Incisional hernia after abdominal surgery is a well-known complication and the incidence of incisional hernias continues to be 2-11% after laparotomy. The repair of incisional hernia has always been a challenge to the surgeon. Various operative techniques for the repair of incisional h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kundan Kharde, Bharat Bhushan Dogra, Sunil Panchabhai, Karan V. S. Rana, Srihari Sridharan, Sai Kalyan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2013-01-01
Series:Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil University
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mjdrdypu.org/article.asp?issn=0975-2870;year=2013;volume=6;issue=3;spage=258;epage=262;aulast=Kharde
_version_ 1811284309102821376
author Kundan Kharde
Bharat Bhushan Dogra
Sunil Panchabhai
Karan V. S. Rana
Srihari Sridharan
Sai Kalyan
author_facet Kundan Kharde
Bharat Bhushan Dogra
Sunil Panchabhai
Karan V. S. Rana
Srihari Sridharan
Sai Kalyan
author_sort Kundan Kharde
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Incisional hernia after abdominal surgery is a well-known complication and the incidence of incisional hernias continues to be 2-11% after laparotomy. The repair of incisional hernia has always been a challenge to the surgeon. Various operative techniques for the repair of incisional hernia are in practice; however, the management is not standardized. The retro-rectus mesh placement or the sub-lay technique, popularized by Rives and Stoppa in Europe, has been reported to be quite effective, with low recurrence rates (0-23%) and minimal complications. Aims and Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the traditional on-lay mesh and retro-rectus mesh placement in incisional hernia repairs in terms of time taken for surgery, early complications (wound infections, Mesh extrusion), and Delayed complications (Recurrence). Materials and Methods: This is a prospective study which was conducted in the surgical department of our hospital. A total of 50 cases were included in this study. Of these cases, 25 cases were operated by the on-lay mesh method and 25 by retro-rectus mesh placement. Only the patients with midline hernias up to 10 cm in diameter were included in the study. Result: The operative time for retro-rectus mesh placement was insignificantly higher than that of on-lay mesh repair, whereas, complications like superficial Surgical site infection SSI were identical in both the study groups, but deep SSI leading to infection of mesh was higher in on-lay mesh repair. The recurrence rate was found to be 4% in on-lay mesh repair and 0% in retro-rectus mesh repair. Conclusion: The follow-up period in this study was 6months; hence, late recurrences were not taken into account. However, the low rate of local complications and the low recurrence rate indicate that retro-rectus mesh repair has an advantage over traditional on-lay repair.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T02:26:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-832ec132916f49049a17c38b0799200e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0975-2870
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T02:26:44Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil University
spelling doaj.art-832ec132916f49049a17c38b0799200e2022-12-22T03:06:45ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsMedical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil University0975-28702013-01-016325826210.4103/0975-2870.114650A comparative study of onlay and retrorectus mesh placement in incisional hernia repairKundan KhardeBharat Bhushan DograSunil PanchabhaiKaran V. S. RanaSrihari SridharanSai KalyanIntroduction: Incisional hernia after abdominal surgery is a well-known complication and the incidence of incisional hernias continues to be 2-11% after laparotomy. The repair of incisional hernia has always been a challenge to the surgeon. Various operative techniques for the repair of incisional hernia are in practice; however, the management is not standardized. The retro-rectus mesh placement or the sub-lay technique, popularized by Rives and Stoppa in Europe, has been reported to be quite effective, with low recurrence rates (0-23%) and minimal complications. Aims and Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the traditional on-lay mesh and retro-rectus mesh placement in incisional hernia repairs in terms of time taken for surgery, early complications (wound infections, Mesh extrusion), and Delayed complications (Recurrence). Materials and Methods: This is a prospective study which was conducted in the surgical department of our hospital. A total of 50 cases were included in this study. Of these cases, 25 cases were operated by the on-lay mesh method and 25 by retro-rectus mesh placement. Only the patients with midline hernias up to 10 cm in diameter were included in the study. Result: The operative time for retro-rectus mesh placement was insignificantly higher than that of on-lay mesh repair, whereas, complications like superficial Surgical site infection SSI were identical in both the study groups, but deep SSI leading to infection of mesh was higher in on-lay mesh repair. The recurrence rate was found to be 4% in on-lay mesh repair and 0% in retro-rectus mesh repair. Conclusion: The follow-up period in this study was 6months; hence, late recurrences were not taken into account. However, the low rate of local complications and the low recurrence rate indicate that retro-rectus mesh repair has an advantage over traditional on-lay repair.http://www.mjdrdypu.org/article.asp?issn=0975-2870;year=2013;volume=6;issue=3;spage=258;epage=262;aulast=KhardeIncisional herniaonlay repairretrorectus mesh repair
spellingShingle Kundan Kharde
Bharat Bhushan Dogra
Sunil Panchabhai
Karan V. S. Rana
Srihari Sridharan
Sai Kalyan
A comparative study of onlay and retrorectus mesh placement in incisional hernia repair
Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil University
Incisional hernia
onlay repair
retrorectus mesh repair
title A comparative study of onlay and retrorectus mesh placement in incisional hernia repair
title_full A comparative study of onlay and retrorectus mesh placement in incisional hernia repair
title_fullStr A comparative study of onlay and retrorectus mesh placement in incisional hernia repair
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of onlay and retrorectus mesh placement in incisional hernia repair
title_short A comparative study of onlay and retrorectus mesh placement in incisional hernia repair
title_sort comparative study of onlay and retrorectus mesh placement in incisional hernia repair
topic Incisional hernia
onlay repair
retrorectus mesh repair
url http://www.mjdrdypu.org/article.asp?issn=0975-2870;year=2013;volume=6;issue=3;spage=258;epage=262;aulast=Kharde
work_keys_str_mv AT kundankharde acomparativestudyofonlayandretrorectusmeshplacementinincisionalherniarepair
AT bharatbhushandogra acomparativestudyofonlayandretrorectusmeshplacementinincisionalherniarepair
AT sunilpanchabhai acomparativestudyofonlayandretrorectusmeshplacementinincisionalherniarepair
AT karanvsrana acomparativestudyofonlayandretrorectusmeshplacementinincisionalherniarepair
AT sriharisridharan acomparativestudyofonlayandretrorectusmeshplacementinincisionalherniarepair
AT saikalyan acomparativestudyofonlayandretrorectusmeshplacementinincisionalherniarepair
AT kundankharde comparativestudyofonlayandretrorectusmeshplacementinincisionalherniarepair
AT bharatbhushandogra comparativestudyofonlayandretrorectusmeshplacementinincisionalherniarepair
AT sunilpanchabhai comparativestudyofonlayandretrorectusmeshplacementinincisionalherniarepair
AT karanvsrana comparativestudyofonlayandretrorectusmeshplacementinincisionalherniarepair
AT sriharisridharan comparativestudyofonlayandretrorectusmeshplacementinincisionalherniarepair
AT saikalyan comparativestudyofonlayandretrorectusmeshplacementinincisionalherniarepair