A budget optimisation model for road safety infrastructure countermeasures

The requirements and modifications to the road infrastructure to achieve high levels of safety require different countermeasures that are not directly comparable considering their life span. It is felt that the effectiveness of a road safety programme highly depends on the best mix between capital a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chris Bic Byaruhanga, Harry Evdorides
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2022-12-01
Series:Cogent Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23311916.2022.2129363
_version_ 1797759459304407040
author Chris Bic Byaruhanga
Harry Evdorides
author_facet Chris Bic Byaruhanga
Harry Evdorides
author_sort Chris Bic Byaruhanga
collection DOAJ
description The requirements and modifications to the road infrastructure to achieve high levels of safety require different countermeasures that are not directly comparable considering their life span. It is felt that the effectiveness of a road safety programme highly depends on the best mix between capital and maintenance work measures. To this end, this article introduces a novel methodology that prioritises countermeasures by considering their effectiveness over their life span together with budget constraints, based on a mixed integer linear programming model with an objective function to maximise their economic safety benefits. To illustrate the application of the proposed model developed using the LINGO software, a case study from the Netherlands, Utrecht provincial roads, was used. The results show that this approach seems to enhance both the prioritisation and the number of countermeasures selected for implementation. Furthermore, the method can compute the minimum budget required to maximise the economic benefits from capital work measures. It may also prioritise road safety-related maintenance work programmes and offer a plan for capital works if funds are below the minimum budget. Consequently, this approach appears to enhance the non-life span approach due to an improved mix between capital and maintenance work programmes for road safety.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T18:44:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-833491ae8179413f930371e865060090
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2331-1916
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T18:44:46Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Cogent Engineering
spelling doaj.art-833491ae8179413f930371e8650600902023-08-02T07:46:31ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Engineering2331-19162022-12-019110.1080/23311916.2022.2129363A budget optimisation model for road safety infrastructure countermeasuresChris Bic Byaruhanga0Harry Evdorides1Department of Civil Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKThe requirements and modifications to the road infrastructure to achieve high levels of safety require different countermeasures that are not directly comparable considering their life span. It is felt that the effectiveness of a road safety programme highly depends on the best mix between capital and maintenance work measures. To this end, this article introduces a novel methodology that prioritises countermeasures by considering their effectiveness over their life span together with budget constraints, based on a mixed integer linear programming model with an objective function to maximise their economic safety benefits. To illustrate the application of the proposed model developed using the LINGO software, a case study from the Netherlands, Utrecht provincial roads, was used. The results show that this approach seems to enhance both the prioritisation and the number of countermeasures selected for implementation. Furthermore, the method can compute the minimum budget required to maximise the economic benefits from capital work measures. It may also prioritise road safety-related maintenance work programmes and offer a plan for capital works if funds are below the minimum budget. Consequently, this approach appears to enhance the non-life span approach due to an improved mix between capital and maintenance work programmes for road safety.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23311916.2022.2129363life spanmodelinfrastructure countermeasuresroad safetybudget optimisationeconomic benefits
spellingShingle Chris Bic Byaruhanga
Harry Evdorides
A budget optimisation model for road safety infrastructure countermeasures
Cogent Engineering
life span
model
infrastructure countermeasures
road safety
budget optimisation
economic benefits
title A budget optimisation model for road safety infrastructure countermeasures
title_full A budget optimisation model for road safety infrastructure countermeasures
title_fullStr A budget optimisation model for road safety infrastructure countermeasures
title_full_unstemmed A budget optimisation model for road safety infrastructure countermeasures
title_short A budget optimisation model for road safety infrastructure countermeasures
title_sort budget optimisation model for road safety infrastructure countermeasures
topic life span
model
infrastructure countermeasures
road safety
budget optimisation
economic benefits
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23311916.2022.2129363
work_keys_str_mv AT chrisbicbyaruhanga abudgetoptimisationmodelforroadsafetyinfrastructurecountermeasures
AT harryevdorides abudgetoptimisationmodelforroadsafetyinfrastructurecountermeasures
AT chrisbicbyaruhanga budgetoptimisationmodelforroadsafetyinfrastructurecountermeasures
AT harryevdorides budgetoptimisationmodelforroadsafetyinfrastructurecountermeasures