A Method to Account for Personnel Risk Attitudes in System Design and Maintenance Activity Development

Systems engineering practices in the maritime industry and the Navy consider operational availability as a system attribute determined by system components and a maintenance concept. A better understanding of the risk attitudes of system operators and maintainers may be useful in understanding poten...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin W. Rathwell, Douglas L. Van Bossuyt, Anthony Pollman, Joseph Sweeney
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-08-01
Series:Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/8/3/26
_version_ 1827711614686593024
author Benjamin W. Rathwell
Douglas L. Van Bossuyt
Anthony Pollman
Joseph Sweeney
author_facet Benjamin W. Rathwell
Douglas L. Van Bossuyt
Anthony Pollman
Joseph Sweeney
author_sort Benjamin W. Rathwell
collection DOAJ
description Systems engineering practices in the maritime industry and the Navy consider operational availability as a system attribute determined by system components and a maintenance concept. A better understanding of the risk attitudes of system operators and maintainers may be useful in understanding potential impacts the system operators and maintainers have on operational availability. This article contributes to the literature a method that synthesizes the concepts of system reliability, and operator and maintainer risk attitudes to provide insight into the effect that risk attitudes of systems operators and maintainers have on system operational availability. The method consists of four steps providing the engineer with a risk-attitude-adjusted insight into the system’s potential operational availability. Systems engineers may use the method to iterate a system’s design or maintenance concept to improve expected operational availability. If it is deemed necessary to redesign a system, systems engineers will likely choose new system components and/or alter their configuration; however, redesign is not limited to physical alteration of the system. Several other options may be more practical depending the system’s stage in the life cycle to address low risk-adjusted operational availability such as changes to maintenance programs and system supportability rather than on component and system reliability. A simple representative example implementation is provided to demonstrate the method and discussion of the potential implications for Navy ship availability are discussed. Potential future work is also discussed.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T17:58:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8337de7ce16d42948b1b31517c36f724
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-8954
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T17:58:48Z
publishDate 2020-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Systems
spelling doaj.art-8337de7ce16d42948b1b31517c36f7242023-11-20T09:03:38ZengMDPI AGSystems2079-89542020-08-01832610.3390/systems8030026A Method to Account for Personnel Risk Attitudes in System Design and Maintenance Activity DevelopmentBenjamin W. Rathwell0Douglas L. Van Bossuyt1Anthony Pollman2Joseph Sweeney3Department of Systems Engineering, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 93943, USADepartment of Systems Engineering, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 93943, USADepartment of Systems Engineering, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 93943, USADepartment of Systems Engineering, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 93943, USASystems engineering practices in the maritime industry and the Navy consider operational availability as a system attribute determined by system components and a maintenance concept. A better understanding of the risk attitudes of system operators and maintainers may be useful in understanding potential impacts the system operators and maintainers have on operational availability. This article contributes to the literature a method that synthesizes the concepts of system reliability, and operator and maintainer risk attitudes to provide insight into the effect that risk attitudes of systems operators and maintainers have on system operational availability. The method consists of four steps providing the engineer with a risk-attitude-adjusted insight into the system’s potential operational availability. Systems engineers may use the method to iterate a system’s design or maintenance concept to improve expected operational availability. If it is deemed necessary to redesign a system, systems engineers will likely choose new system components and/or alter their configuration; however, redesign is not limited to physical alteration of the system. Several other options may be more practical depending the system’s stage in the life cycle to address low risk-adjusted operational availability such as changes to maintenance programs and system supportability rather than on component and system reliability. A simple representative example implementation is provided to demonstrate the method and discussion of the potential implications for Navy ship availability are discussed. Potential future work is also discussed.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/8/3/26availabilitydecision-makinghuman factors engineeringhuman systems integrationmaintenancereliability
spellingShingle Benjamin W. Rathwell
Douglas L. Van Bossuyt
Anthony Pollman
Joseph Sweeney
A Method to Account for Personnel Risk Attitudes in System Design and Maintenance Activity Development
Systems
availability
decision-making
human factors engineering
human systems integration
maintenance
reliability
title A Method to Account for Personnel Risk Attitudes in System Design and Maintenance Activity Development
title_full A Method to Account for Personnel Risk Attitudes in System Design and Maintenance Activity Development
title_fullStr A Method to Account for Personnel Risk Attitudes in System Design and Maintenance Activity Development
title_full_unstemmed A Method to Account for Personnel Risk Attitudes in System Design and Maintenance Activity Development
title_short A Method to Account for Personnel Risk Attitudes in System Design and Maintenance Activity Development
title_sort method to account for personnel risk attitudes in system design and maintenance activity development
topic availability
decision-making
human factors engineering
human systems integration
maintenance
reliability
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/8/3/26
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminwrathwell amethodtoaccountforpersonnelriskattitudesinsystemdesignandmaintenanceactivitydevelopment
AT douglaslvanbossuyt amethodtoaccountforpersonnelriskattitudesinsystemdesignandmaintenanceactivitydevelopment
AT anthonypollman amethodtoaccountforpersonnelriskattitudesinsystemdesignandmaintenanceactivitydevelopment
AT josephsweeney amethodtoaccountforpersonnelriskattitudesinsystemdesignandmaintenanceactivitydevelopment
AT benjaminwrathwell methodtoaccountforpersonnelriskattitudesinsystemdesignandmaintenanceactivitydevelopment
AT douglaslvanbossuyt methodtoaccountforpersonnelriskattitudesinsystemdesignandmaintenanceactivitydevelopment
AT anthonypollman methodtoaccountforpersonnelriskattitudesinsystemdesignandmaintenanceactivitydevelopment
AT josephsweeney methodtoaccountforpersonnelriskattitudesinsystemdesignandmaintenanceactivitydevelopment