A Method to Account for Personnel Risk Attitudes in System Design and Maintenance Activity Development
Systems engineering practices in the maritime industry and the Navy consider operational availability as a system attribute determined by system components and a maintenance concept. A better understanding of the risk attitudes of system operators and maintainers may be useful in understanding poten...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-08-01
|
Series: | Systems |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/8/3/26 |
_version_ | 1827711614686593024 |
---|---|
author | Benjamin W. Rathwell Douglas L. Van Bossuyt Anthony Pollman Joseph Sweeney |
author_facet | Benjamin W. Rathwell Douglas L. Van Bossuyt Anthony Pollman Joseph Sweeney |
author_sort | Benjamin W. Rathwell |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Systems engineering practices in the maritime industry and the Navy consider operational availability as a system attribute determined by system components and a maintenance concept. A better understanding of the risk attitudes of system operators and maintainers may be useful in understanding potential impacts the system operators and maintainers have on operational availability. This article contributes to the literature a method that synthesizes the concepts of system reliability, and operator and maintainer risk attitudes to provide insight into the effect that risk attitudes of systems operators and maintainers have on system operational availability. The method consists of four steps providing the engineer with a risk-attitude-adjusted insight into the system’s potential operational availability. Systems engineers may use the method to iterate a system’s design or maintenance concept to improve expected operational availability. If it is deemed necessary to redesign a system, systems engineers will likely choose new system components and/or alter their configuration; however, redesign is not limited to physical alteration of the system. Several other options may be more practical depending the system’s stage in the life cycle to address low risk-adjusted operational availability such as changes to maintenance programs and system supportability rather than on component and system reliability. A simple representative example implementation is provided to demonstrate the method and discussion of the potential implications for Navy ship availability are discussed. Potential future work is also discussed. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T17:58:48Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-8337de7ce16d42948b1b31517c36f724 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2079-8954 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T17:58:48Z |
publishDate | 2020-08-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Systems |
spelling | doaj.art-8337de7ce16d42948b1b31517c36f7242023-11-20T09:03:38ZengMDPI AGSystems2079-89542020-08-01832610.3390/systems8030026A Method to Account for Personnel Risk Attitudes in System Design and Maintenance Activity DevelopmentBenjamin W. Rathwell0Douglas L. Van Bossuyt1Anthony Pollman2Joseph Sweeney3Department of Systems Engineering, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 93943, USADepartment of Systems Engineering, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 93943, USADepartment of Systems Engineering, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 93943, USADepartment of Systems Engineering, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 93943, USASystems engineering practices in the maritime industry and the Navy consider operational availability as a system attribute determined by system components and a maintenance concept. A better understanding of the risk attitudes of system operators and maintainers may be useful in understanding potential impacts the system operators and maintainers have on operational availability. This article contributes to the literature a method that synthesizes the concepts of system reliability, and operator and maintainer risk attitudes to provide insight into the effect that risk attitudes of systems operators and maintainers have on system operational availability. The method consists of four steps providing the engineer with a risk-attitude-adjusted insight into the system’s potential operational availability. Systems engineers may use the method to iterate a system’s design or maintenance concept to improve expected operational availability. If it is deemed necessary to redesign a system, systems engineers will likely choose new system components and/or alter their configuration; however, redesign is not limited to physical alteration of the system. Several other options may be more practical depending the system’s stage in the life cycle to address low risk-adjusted operational availability such as changes to maintenance programs and system supportability rather than on component and system reliability. A simple representative example implementation is provided to demonstrate the method and discussion of the potential implications for Navy ship availability are discussed. Potential future work is also discussed.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/8/3/26availabilitydecision-makinghuman factors engineeringhuman systems integrationmaintenancereliability |
spellingShingle | Benjamin W. Rathwell Douglas L. Van Bossuyt Anthony Pollman Joseph Sweeney A Method to Account for Personnel Risk Attitudes in System Design and Maintenance Activity Development Systems availability decision-making human factors engineering human systems integration maintenance reliability |
title | A Method to Account for Personnel Risk Attitudes in System Design and Maintenance Activity Development |
title_full | A Method to Account for Personnel Risk Attitudes in System Design and Maintenance Activity Development |
title_fullStr | A Method to Account for Personnel Risk Attitudes in System Design and Maintenance Activity Development |
title_full_unstemmed | A Method to Account for Personnel Risk Attitudes in System Design and Maintenance Activity Development |
title_short | A Method to Account for Personnel Risk Attitudes in System Design and Maintenance Activity Development |
title_sort | method to account for personnel risk attitudes in system design and maintenance activity development |
topic | availability decision-making human factors engineering human systems integration maintenance reliability |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/8/3/26 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benjaminwrathwell amethodtoaccountforpersonnelriskattitudesinsystemdesignandmaintenanceactivitydevelopment AT douglaslvanbossuyt amethodtoaccountforpersonnelriskattitudesinsystemdesignandmaintenanceactivitydevelopment AT anthonypollman amethodtoaccountforpersonnelriskattitudesinsystemdesignandmaintenanceactivitydevelopment AT josephsweeney amethodtoaccountforpersonnelriskattitudesinsystemdesignandmaintenanceactivitydevelopment AT benjaminwrathwell methodtoaccountforpersonnelriskattitudesinsystemdesignandmaintenanceactivitydevelopment AT douglaslvanbossuyt methodtoaccountforpersonnelriskattitudesinsystemdesignandmaintenanceactivitydevelopment AT anthonypollman methodtoaccountforpersonnelriskattitudesinsystemdesignandmaintenanceactivitydevelopment AT josephsweeney methodtoaccountforpersonnelriskattitudesinsystemdesignandmaintenanceactivitydevelopment |