Intermediate-term oncological and functional outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with perineal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A single center analysis

Objective: In the last 10 years, robotic platforms allowed to resume of some alternative surgical approaches, including perineal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (p-RARP). Herein, we present in detail the oncological and functional outcomes of patients who underwent p-RARP with a median follow-u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Umberto Carbonara, Giuseppe Lippolis, Luciano Rella, Paolo Minafra, Giuseppe Guglielmi, Antonio Vitarelli, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Pasquale Ditonno
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-10-01
Series:Asian Journal of Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214388223000826
_version_ 1827770240278200320
author Umberto Carbonara
Giuseppe Lippolis
Luciano Rella
Paolo Minafra
Giuseppe Guglielmi
Antonio Vitarelli
Giuseppe Lucarelli
Pasquale Ditonno
author_facet Umberto Carbonara
Giuseppe Lippolis
Luciano Rella
Paolo Minafra
Giuseppe Guglielmi
Antonio Vitarelli
Giuseppe Lucarelli
Pasquale Ditonno
author_sort Umberto Carbonara
collection DOAJ
description Objective: In the last 10 years, robotic platforms allowed to resume of some alternative surgical approaches, including perineal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (p-RARP). Herein, we present in detail the oncological and functional outcomes of patients who underwent p-RARP with a median follow-up of 30 months. Methods: Patients presenting low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer and prostate volume up to 60 mL who underwent p-RARP between November 2018 and November 2022 were selected. Baseline, intraoperative, pathological, and postoperative data were collected and then analyzed. Results: Thirty-seven p-RARP cases were included. Such patients presented mean age of 62 years and a mean Charlson comorbidity index of 4. Body mass index of ≥25 kg/m2 was reported by 24 (64.9%) patients, as well as 7 (18.9%) patients reported a past surgical history. Mean prostate volume and median prostate-specific antigen were 41 mL and 6.2 ng/mL, respectively. The median operative time was 242 min. The positive surgical margin rate was 45.9%. In terms of postoperative complications, 10 patients reported complications with any grade; however, a single case (2.7%) of major (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3) complication was observed. No patient with biochemical recurrence or distant metastasis was reported at 2 years of follow-up. Recovery of continence rates were 67.6%, 75.7%, and 92.9%, at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery, respectively. Conclusion: p-RARP is a challenging but safe minimally invasive approach for selected patients with prostate cancer suitable for radical prostatectomy, showing outstanding functional recovery. Despite positive surgical margin rates being relatively high, no cases of biochemical recurrence or distant metastasis were reported after a median follow-up of 30 months.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T12:35:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-833981c1883e4f718e8c8525bfdd5ebb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2214-3882
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T12:35:45Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Asian Journal of Urology
spelling doaj.art-833981c1883e4f718e8c8525bfdd5ebb2023-11-06T04:21:26ZengElsevierAsian Journal of Urology2214-38822023-10-01104423430Intermediate-term oncological and functional outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with perineal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A single center analysisUmberto Carbonara0Giuseppe Lippolis1Luciano Rella2Paolo Minafra3Giuseppe Guglielmi4Antonio Vitarelli5Giuseppe Lucarelli6Pasquale Ditonno7Corresponding author.; Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology Unit, Aldo Moro University, Bari, ItalyDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology Unit, Aldo Moro University, Bari, ItalyDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology Unit, Aldo Moro University, Bari, ItalyDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology Unit, Aldo Moro University, Bari, ItalyDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology Unit, Aldo Moro University, Bari, ItalyDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology Unit, Aldo Moro University, Bari, ItalyDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology Unit, Aldo Moro University, Bari, ItalyDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology Unit, Aldo Moro University, Bari, ItalyObjective: In the last 10 years, robotic platforms allowed to resume of some alternative surgical approaches, including perineal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (p-RARP). Herein, we present in detail the oncological and functional outcomes of patients who underwent p-RARP with a median follow-up of 30 months. Methods: Patients presenting low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer and prostate volume up to 60 mL who underwent p-RARP between November 2018 and November 2022 were selected. Baseline, intraoperative, pathological, and postoperative data were collected and then analyzed. Results: Thirty-seven p-RARP cases were included. Such patients presented mean age of 62 years and a mean Charlson comorbidity index of 4. Body mass index of ≥25 kg/m2 was reported by 24 (64.9%) patients, as well as 7 (18.9%) patients reported a past surgical history. Mean prostate volume and median prostate-specific antigen were 41 mL and 6.2 ng/mL, respectively. The median operative time was 242 min. The positive surgical margin rate was 45.9%. In terms of postoperative complications, 10 patients reported complications with any grade; however, a single case (2.7%) of major (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3) complication was observed. No patient with biochemical recurrence or distant metastasis was reported at 2 years of follow-up. Recovery of continence rates were 67.6%, 75.7%, and 92.9%, at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery, respectively. Conclusion: p-RARP is a challenging but safe minimally invasive approach for selected patients with prostate cancer suitable for radical prostatectomy, showing outstanding functional recovery. Despite positive surgical margin rates being relatively high, no cases of biochemical recurrence or distant metastasis were reported after a median follow-up of 30 months.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214388223000826Prostate cancerRoboticPerinealRadical prostatectomyContinenceRobot-assisted radical prostatectomy
spellingShingle Umberto Carbonara
Giuseppe Lippolis
Luciano Rella
Paolo Minafra
Giuseppe Guglielmi
Antonio Vitarelli
Giuseppe Lucarelli
Pasquale Ditonno
Intermediate-term oncological and functional outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with perineal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A single center analysis
Asian Journal of Urology
Prostate cancer
Robotic
Perineal
Radical prostatectomy
Continence
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
title Intermediate-term oncological and functional outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with perineal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A single center analysis
title_full Intermediate-term oncological and functional outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with perineal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A single center analysis
title_fullStr Intermediate-term oncological and functional outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with perineal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A single center analysis
title_full_unstemmed Intermediate-term oncological and functional outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with perineal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A single center analysis
title_short Intermediate-term oncological and functional outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with perineal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A single center analysis
title_sort intermediate term oncological and functional outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with perineal robot assisted radical prostatectomy a single center analysis
topic Prostate cancer
Robotic
Perineal
Radical prostatectomy
Continence
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214388223000826
work_keys_str_mv AT umbertocarbonara intermediatetermoncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesinprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithperinealrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyasinglecenteranalysis
AT giuseppelippolis intermediatetermoncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesinprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithperinealrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyasinglecenteranalysis
AT lucianorella intermediatetermoncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesinprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithperinealrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyasinglecenteranalysis
AT paolominafra intermediatetermoncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesinprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithperinealrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyasinglecenteranalysis
AT giuseppeguglielmi intermediatetermoncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesinprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithperinealrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyasinglecenteranalysis
AT antoniovitarelli intermediatetermoncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesinprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithperinealrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyasinglecenteranalysis
AT giuseppelucarelli intermediatetermoncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesinprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithperinealrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyasinglecenteranalysis
AT pasqualeditonno intermediatetermoncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesinprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithperinealrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyasinglecenteranalysis