How effective is Philosophy for Children in contributing to the affective engagement of pupils in the context of secondary Religious Education?

This paper reports the findings of a predominantly qualitative study that explored the effects of the practice of Philosophy for Children (P4C) on pupils’ affective engagement.[1] From its conception, the practice of P4C has been linked to the development of caring and collaborative thinking and the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Asha Lancaster-Thomas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Birmingham Library Services 2017-05-01
Series:Journal of Philosophy in Schools
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jps.bham.ac.uk/articles/69
_version_ 1818650600311619584
author Asha Lancaster-Thomas
author_facet Asha Lancaster-Thomas
author_sort Asha Lancaster-Thomas
collection DOAJ
description This paper reports the findings of a predominantly qualitative study that explored the effects of the practice of Philosophy for Children (P4C) on pupils’ affective engagement.[1] From its conception, the practice of P4C has been linked to the development of caring and collaborative thinking and the study aimed to closely consider that relationship. An appropriate self-designed P4C program was implemented with 75 Year 9 pupils (aged 14 and 15) of Religious Education (a compulsory subject in the British education system in which pupils explore world religions in a non-confessional manner) at an independent secondary school in the United Kingdom. An interpretive research approach was taken and thematic analysis was appropriated to analyse the data. Findings supported the claims of previous research that P4C can foster affective engagement in many pupils, particularly those pupils who find emotional expression and interpersonal interactions challenging. A tentative conclusion reached supposes that P4C has the potential to contribute to the affective engagement of pupils, but with the recommendation that implementing a P4C program must be executed carefully and with the mindfulness that it may not have the same potential or usefulness for all pupils universally.[1] This research was conducted at the University College London. The author is currently a doctoral candidate at the University of Birmingham.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T01:52:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8341054ba0de4f4383533931799d5602
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2204-2482
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T01:52:48Z
publishDate 2017-05-01
publisher University of Birmingham Library Services
record_format Article
series Journal of Philosophy in Schools
spelling doaj.art-8341054ba0de4f4383533931799d56022022-12-21T22:08:02ZengUniversity of Birmingham Library ServicesJournal of Philosophy in Schools2204-24822017-05-014110212210.21913/jps.v4i1.142169How effective is Philosophy for Children in contributing to the affective engagement of pupils in the context of secondary Religious Education?Asha Lancaster-Thomas0University College LondonThis paper reports the findings of a predominantly qualitative study that explored the effects of the practice of Philosophy for Children (P4C) on pupils’ affective engagement.[1] From its conception, the practice of P4C has been linked to the development of caring and collaborative thinking and the study aimed to closely consider that relationship. An appropriate self-designed P4C program was implemented with 75 Year 9 pupils (aged 14 and 15) of Religious Education (a compulsory subject in the British education system in which pupils explore world religions in a non-confessional manner) at an independent secondary school in the United Kingdom. An interpretive research approach was taken and thematic analysis was appropriated to analyse the data. Findings supported the claims of previous research that P4C can foster affective engagement in many pupils, particularly those pupils who find emotional expression and interpersonal interactions challenging. A tentative conclusion reached supposes that P4C has the potential to contribute to the affective engagement of pupils, but with the recommendation that implementing a P4C program must be executed carefully and with the mindfulness that it may not have the same potential or usefulness for all pupils universally.[1] This research was conducted at the University College London. The author is currently a doctoral candidate at the University of Birmingham.https://jps.bham.ac.uk/articles/69affective domaincaring thinkingcollaborative thinkingcommunity of inquiryphilosophy for children
spellingShingle Asha Lancaster-Thomas
How effective is Philosophy for Children in contributing to the affective engagement of pupils in the context of secondary Religious Education?
Journal of Philosophy in Schools
affective domain
caring thinking
collaborative thinking
community of inquiry
philosophy for children
title How effective is Philosophy for Children in contributing to the affective engagement of pupils in the context of secondary Religious Education?
title_full How effective is Philosophy for Children in contributing to the affective engagement of pupils in the context of secondary Religious Education?
title_fullStr How effective is Philosophy for Children in contributing to the affective engagement of pupils in the context of secondary Religious Education?
title_full_unstemmed How effective is Philosophy for Children in contributing to the affective engagement of pupils in the context of secondary Religious Education?
title_short How effective is Philosophy for Children in contributing to the affective engagement of pupils in the context of secondary Religious Education?
title_sort how effective is philosophy for children in contributing to the affective engagement of pupils in the context of secondary religious education
topic affective domain
caring thinking
collaborative thinking
community of inquiry
philosophy for children
url https://jps.bham.ac.uk/articles/69
work_keys_str_mv AT ashalancasterthomas howeffectiveisphilosophyforchildrenincontributingtotheaffectiveengagementofpupilsinthecontextofsecondaryreligiouseducation