Video versus live lecture courses: a comparative evaluation of lecture types and results

Background: Video lectures are an increasingly popular format. They allow an individual choice of time, place and speed of learning. Objective: The aim of the present study was to compare whether video lectures are as effective as live lectures to impart the complete contents of the clinical part of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas Brockfeld, Bringfried Müller, Jan de Laffolie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018-01-01
Series:Medical Education Online
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2018.1555434
_version_ 1818927376974741504
author Thomas Brockfeld
Bringfried Müller
Jan de Laffolie
author_facet Thomas Brockfeld
Bringfried Müller
Jan de Laffolie
author_sort Thomas Brockfeld
collection DOAJ
description Background: Video lectures are an increasingly popular format. They allow an individual choice of time, place and speed of learning. Objective: The aim of the present study was to compare whether video lectures are as effective as live lectures to impart the complete contents of the clinical part of the medical exam. The study also examines whether students prefer live or video lectures and for what reason. Design: In 2014, a preparatory course was held at the University of Göttingen to train medical students for the clinical part of the medical exams. Three-quarters of the participants received 41 four-hour lessons live, while the same lessons were shown on video to the remaining quarter. The assignment to the video group changed daily, so that all students saw both live and video lectures. To compare the effectiveness, it was evaluated for 205 students how video and live students answered the 301 multiple choice questions of the medical exam. Results: There is hardly any difference regarding effectiveness. 36,735 of 46,926 questions (78.283%) were correctly answered by the live group, while 11,617 of 14,779 questions (78.605%) were correctly answered by the video group (n.s., p = 0.407, effect size ω = 0.003337). There were some differences in subjective evaluation: 48% of students preferred live lessons, 27% preferred video lessons and 25% stated ‘neutral’. The items ‘learning atmosphere’, ‘ability to concentrate’, ‘presence of other students’ and ‘acoustic intelligibility’ were assessed significantly better for the video courses than for the live courses. No item of the live course was rated better than in the video course. Conclusions: Video and live lectures are equally effective in preparation for the clinical part of the medical exams. Video lectures offer many benefits for the students and for the faculties, and may complement and partly replace conventional live events.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T03:12:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-834b37ca9e2e42b3a8b10616ab9a0771
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1087-2981
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T03:12:02Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Medical Education Online
spelling doaj.art-834b37ca9e2e42b3a8b10616ab9a07712022-12-21T19:55:27ZengTaylor & Francis GroupMedical Education Online1087-29812018-01-0123110.1080/10872981.2018.15554341555434Video versus live lecture courses: a comparative evaluation of lecture types and resultsThomas Brockfeld0Bringfried Müller1Jan de Laffolie2Justus-Liebig-UniversityPrivate Institute Offering Medical Revision Courses For Medical StudentsJustus-Liebig-UniversityBackground: Video lectures are an increasingly popular format. They allow an individual choice of time, place and speed of learning. Objective: The aim of the present study was to compare whether video lectures are as effective as live lectures to impart the complete contents of the clinical part of the medical exam. The study also examines whether students prefer live or video lectures and for what reason. Design: In 2014, a preparatory course was held at the University of Göttingen to train medical students for the clinical part of the medical exams. Three-quarters of the participants received 41 four-hour lessons live, while the same lessons were shown on video to the remaining quarter. The assignment to the video group changed daily, so that all students saw both live and video lectures. To compare the effectiveness, it was evaluated for 205 students how video and live students answered the 301 multiple choice questions of the medical exam. Results: There is hardly any difference regarding effectiveness. 36,735 of 46,926 questions (78.283%) were correctly answered by the live group, while 11,617 of 14,779 questions (78.605%) were correctly answered by the video group (n.s., p = 0.407, effect size ω = 0.003337). There were some differences in subjective evaluation: 48% of students preferred live lessons, 27% preferred video lessons and 25% stated ‘neutral’. The items ‘learning atmosphere’, ‘ability to concentrate’, ‘presence of other students’ and ‘acoustic intelligibility’ were assessed significantly better for the video courses than for the live courses. No item of the live course was rated better than in the video course. Conclusions: Video and live lectures are equally effective in preparation for the clinical part of the medical exams. Video lectures offer many benefits for the students and for the faculties, and may complement and partly replace conventional live events.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2018.1555434Lecture videosclinical educationeducational technologiesvideo-based teaching
spellingShingle Thomas Brockfeld
Bringfried Müller
Jan de Laffolie
Video versus live lecture courses: a comparative evaluation of lecture types and results
Medical Education Online
Lecture videos
clinical education
educational technologies
video-based teaching
title Video versus live lecture courses: a comparative evaluation of lecture types and results
title_full Video versus live lecture courses: a comparative evaluation of lecture types and results
title_fullStr Video versus live lecture courses: a comparative evaluation of lecture types and results
title_full_unstemmed Video versus live lecture courses: a comparative evaluation of lecture types and results
title_short Video versus live lecture courses: a comparative evaluation of lecture types and results
title_sort video versus live lecture courses a comparative evaluation of lecture types and results
topic Lecture videos
clinical education
educational technologies
video-based teaching
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2018.1555434
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasbrockfeld videoversuslivelecturecoursesacomparativeevaluationoflecturetypesandresults
AT bringfriedmuller videoversuslivelecturecoursesacomparativeevaluationoflecturetypesandresults
AT jandelaffolie videoversuslivelecturecoursesacomparativeevaluationoflecturetypesandresults