Comparison of dry and gel based electrodes for P300 brain-computer interfaces

Most brain-computer interfaces (BCI) rely on one of three types of signals in the electroencephalogram (EEG): P300s, steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEP), and event-related desynchronization (ERD). EEG is typically recorded non-invasively with electrodes mounted on the human scalp using c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christoph eGuger, Gunther eKrausz, Brendan Z Allison, Guenter eEdlinger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2012.00060/full
_version_ 1828472887397318656
author Christoph eGuger
Gunther eKrausz
Brendan Z Allison
Guenter eEdlinger
author_facet Christoph eGuger
Gunther eKrausz
Brendan Z Allison
Guenter eEdlinger
author_sort Christoph eGuger
collection DOAJ
description Most brain-computer interfaces (BCI) rely on one of three types of signals in the electroencephalogram (EEG): P300s, steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEP), and event-related desynchronization (ERD). EEG is typically recorded non-invasively with electrodes mounted on the human scalp using conductive electrode gel for optimal impedance and data quality. The use of electrode gel entails serious problems that are especially pronounced in real-world settings when experts are not available. Some recent work has introduced dry electrode systems that do not require gel, but often introduce new problems such as comfort and signal quality. The principal goal of this study was to assess a new dry electrode BCI system in a very common task: spelling with a P300 BCI. A total of 23 subjects used a P300 BCI to spell the word LUCAS while receiving realtime, closed-loop feedback. The dry system yielded classification accuracies that were similar to those obtained with gel systems. All subjects completed a questionnaire after data recording, and all subjects stated that the dry system was not uncomfortable. This is the first field validation of a dry electrode P300 BCI system, and paves the way for new research and development with EEG recording systems that are much more practical and convenient in field settings than conventional systems.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T05:36:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8359a11a200d433bbed244d85ab149ea
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-453X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T05:36:22Z
publishDate 2012-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-8359a11a200d433bbed244d85ab149ea2022-12-22T01:19:16ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2012-05-01610.3389/fnins.2012.0006025155Comparison of dry and gel based electrodes for P300 brain-computer interfacesChristoph eGuger0Gunther eKrausz1Brendan Z Allison2Guenter eEdlinger3Guger Technologies OEG/g.tec medical engineering GmbHGuger Technologies OEG/g.tec medical engineering GmbHUniversity of California at San DiegoGuger Technologies OEG/g.tec medical engineering GmbHMost brain-computer interfaces (BCI) rely on one of three types of signals in the electroencephalogram (EEG): P300s, steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEP), and event-related desynchronization (ERD). EEG is typically recorded non-invasively with electrodes mounted on the human scalp using conductive electrode gel for optimal impedance and data quality. The use of electrode gel entails serious problems that are especially pronounced in real-world settings when experts are not available. Some recent work has introduced dry electrode systems that do not require gel, but often introduce new problems such as comfort and signal quality. The principal goal of this study was to assess a new dry electrode BCI system in a very common task: spelling with a P300 BCI. A total of 23 subjects used a P300 BCI to spell the word LUCAS while receiving realtime, closed-loop feedback. The dry system yielded classification accuracies that were similar to those obtained with gel systems. All subjects completed a questionnaire after data recording, and all subjects stated that the dry system was not uncomfortable. This is the first field validation of a dry electrode P300 BCI system, and paves the way for new research and development with EEG recording systems that are much more practical and convenient in field settings than conventional systems.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2012.00060/fullEEGERPP300brain-computer interface (BCI)Brain-machine interface (BMI)dry electrodes
spellingShingle Christoph eGuger
Gunther eKrausz
Brendan Z Allison
Guenter eEdlinger
Comparison of dry and gel based electrodes for P300 brain-computer interfaces
Frontiers in Neuroscience
EEG
ERP
P300
brain-computer interface (BCI)
Brain-machine interface (BMI)
dry electrodes
title Comparison of dry and gel based electrodes for P300 brain-computer interfaces
title_full Comparison of dry and gel based electrodes for P300 brain-computer interfaces
title_fullStr Comparison of dry and gel based electrodes for P300 brain-computer interfaces
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of dry and gel based electrodes for P300 brain-computer interfaces
title_short Comparison of dry and gel based electrodes for P300 brain-computer interfaces
title_sort comparison of dry and gel based electrodes for p300 brain computer interfaces
topic EEG
ERP
P300
brain-computer interface (BCI)
Brain-machine interface (BMI)
dry electrodes
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2012.00060/full
work_keys_str_mv AT christopheguger comparisonofdryandgelbasedelectrodesforp300braincomputerinterfaces
AT guntherekrausz comparisonofdryandgelbasedelectrodesforp300braincomputerinterfaces
AT brendanzallison comparisonofdryandgelbasedelectrodesforp300braincomputerinterfaces
AT guentereedlinger comparisonofdryandgelbasedelectrodesforp300braincomputerinterfaces