Reanalysis comparisons of upper tropospheric–lower stratospheric jets and multiple tropopauses

The representation of upper tropospheric–lower stratospheric (UTLS) jet and tropopause characteristics is compared in five modern high-resolution reanalyses for 1980 through 2014. Climatologies of upper tropospheric jet, subvortex jet (the lowermost part of the stratospheric vortex), and multipl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G. L. Manney, M. I. Hegglin, Z. D. Lawrence, K. Wargan, L. F. Millán, M. J. Schwartz, M. L. Santee, A. Lambert, S. Pawson, B. W. Knosp, R. A. Fuller, W. H. Daffer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2017-09-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/17/11541/2017/acp-17-11541-2017.pdf
_version_ 1818197095930134528
author G. L. Manney
G. L. Manney
M. I. Hegglin
Z. D. Lawrence
K. Wargan
K. Wargan
L. F. Millán
M. J. Schwartz
M. L. Santee
A. Lambert
S. Pawson
B. W. Knosp
R. A. Fuller
W. H. Daffer
author_facet G. L. Manney
G. L. Manney
M. I. Hegglin
Z. D. Lawrence
K. Wargan
K. Wargan
L. F. Millán
M. J. Schwartz
M. L. Santee
A. Lambert
S. Pawson
B. W. Knosp
R. A. Fuller
W. H. Daffer
author_sort G. L. Manney
collection DOAJ
description The representation of upper tropospheric–lower stratospheric (UTLS) jet and tropopause characteristics is compared in five modern high-resolution reanalyses for 1980 through 2014. Climatologies of upper tropospheric jet, subvortex jet (the lowermost part of the stratospheric vortex), and multiple tropopause frequency distributions in MERRA (Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications), ERA-I (ERA-Interim; the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, ECMWF, interim reanalysis), JRA-55 (the Japanese 55-year Reanalysis), and CFSR (the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis) are compared with those in MERRA-2. Differences between alternate products from individual reanalysis systems are assessed; in particular, a comparison of CFSR data on model and pressure levels highlights the importance of vertical grid spacing. Most of the differences in distributions of UTLS jets and multiple tropopauses are consistent with the differences in assimilation model grids and resolution – for example, ERA-I (with coarsest native horizontal resolution) typically shows a significant low bias in upper tropospheric jets with respect to MERRA-2, and JRA-55 (the Japanese 55-year Reanalysis) a more modest one, while CFSR (with finest native horizontal resolution) shows a high bias with respect to MERRA-2 in both upper tropospheric jets and multiple tropopauses. Vertical temperature structure and grid spacing are especially important for multiple tropopause characterizations. Substantial differences between MERRA and MERRA-2 are seen in mid- to high-latitude Southern Hemisphere (SH) winter upper tropospheric jets and multiple tropopauses as well as in the upper tropospheric jets associated with tropical circulations during the solstice seasons; some of the largest differences from the other reanalyses are seen in the same times and places. Very good qualitative agreement among the reanalyses is seen between the large-scale climatological features in UTLS jet and multiple tropopause distributions. Quantitative differences may, however, have important consequences for transport and variability studies. Our results highlight the importance of considering reanalyses differences in UTLS studies, especially in relation to resolution and model grids; this is particularly critical when using high-resolution reanalyses as an observational reference for evaluating global chemistry–climate models.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T01:44:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-837b3e5ee1694bf3afe5a455c50d6167
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T01:44:32Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
spelling doaj.art-837b3e5ee1694bf3afe5a455c50d61672022-12-22T00:42:37ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242017-09-0117115411156610.5194/acp-17-11541-2017Reanalysis comparisons of upper tropospheric–lower stratospheric jets and multiple tropopausesG. L. Manney0G. L. Manney1M. I. Hegglin2Z. D. Lawrence3K. Wargan4K. Wargan5L. F. Millán6M. J. Schwartz7M. L. Santee8A. Lambert9S. Pawson10B. W. Knosp11R. A. Fuller12W. H. Daffer13NorthWest Research Associates, Socorro, NM, USADepartment of Physics, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM, USADepartment of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UKDepartment of Physics, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM, USANASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USAScience Systems and Applications Inc., Lanham, Maryland, USAJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USAJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USAJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USAJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USANASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USAJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USAJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USAJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USAThe representation of upper tropospheric–lower stratospheric (UTLS) jet and tropopause characteristics is compared in five modern high-resolution reanalyses for 1980 through 2014. Climatologies of upper tropospheric jet, subvortex jet (the lowermost part of the stratospheric vortex), and multiple tropopause frequency distributions in MERRA (Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications), ERA-I (ERA-Interim; the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, ECMWF, interim reanalysis), JRA-55 (the Japanese 55-year Reanalysis), and CFSR (the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis) are compared with those in MERRA-2. Differences between alternate products from individual reanalysis systems are assessed; in particular, a comparison of CFSR data on model and pressure levels highlights the importance of vertical grid spacing. Most of the differences in distributions of UTLS jets and multiple tropopauses are consistent with the differences in assimilation model grids and resolution – for example, ERA-I (with coarsest native horizontal resolution) typically shows a significant low bias in upper tropospheric jets with respect to MERRA-2, and JRA-55 (the Japanese 55-year Reanalysis) a more modest one, while CFSR (with finest native horizontal resolution) shows a high bias with respect to MERRA-2 in both upper tropospheric jets and multiple tropopauses. Vertical temperature structure and grid spacing are especially important for multiple tropopause characterizations. Substantial differences between MERRA and MERRA-2 are seen in mid- to high-latitude Southern Hemisphere (SH) winter upper tropospheric jets and multiple tropopauses as well as in the upper tropospheric jets associated with tropical circulations during the solstice seasons; some of the largest differences from the other reanalyses are seen in the same times and places. Very good qualitative agreement among the reanalyses is seen between the large-scale climatological features in UTLS jet and multiple tropopause distributions. Quantitative differences may, however, have important consequences for transport and variability studies. Our results highlight the importance of considering reanalyses differences in UTLS studies, especially in relation to resolution and model grids; this is particularly critical when using high-resolution reanalyses as an observational reference for evaluating global chemistry–climate models.https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/17/11541/2017/acp-17-11541-2017.pdf
spellingShingle G. L. Manney
G. L. Manney
M. I. Hegglin
Z. D. Lawrence
K. Wargan
K. Wargan
L. F. Millán
M. J. Schwartz
M. L. Santee
A. Lambert
S. Pawson
B. W. Knosp
R. A. Fuller
W. H. Daffer
Reanalysis comparisons of upper tropospheric–lower stratospheric jets and multiple tropopauses
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
title Reanalysis comparisons of upper tropospheric–lower stratospheric jets and multiple tropopauses
title_full Reanalysis comparisons of upper tropospheric–lower stratospheric jets and multiple tropopauses
title_fullStr Reanalysis comparisons of upper tropospheric–lower stratospheric jets and multiple tropopauses
title_full_unstemmed Reanalysis comparisons of upper tropospheric–lower stratospheric jets and multiple tropopauses
title_short Reanalysis comparisons of upper tropospheric–lower stratospheric jets and multiple tropopauses
title_sort reanalysis comparisons of upper tropospheric lower stratospheric jets and multiple tropopauses
url https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/17/11541/2017/acp-17-11541-2017.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT glmanney reanalysiscomparisonsofuppertroposphericlowerstratosphericjetsandmultipletropopauses
AT glmanney reanalysiscomparisonsofuppertroposphericlowerstratosphericjetsandmultipletropopauses
AT mihegglin reanalysiscomparisonsofuppertroposphericlowerstratosphericjetsandmultipletropopauses
AT zdlawrence reanalysiscomparisonsofuppertroposphericlowerstratosphericjetsandmultipletropopauses
AT kwargan reanalysiscomparisonsofuppertroposphericlowerstratosphericjetsandmultipletropopauses
AT kwargan reanalysiscomparisonsofuppertroposphericlowerstratosphericjetsandmultipletropopauses
AT lfmillan reanalysiscomparisonsofuppertroposphericlowerstratosphericjetsandmultipletropopauses
AT mjschwartz reanalysiscomparisonsofuppertroposphericlowerstratosphericjetsandmultipletropopauses
AT mlsantee reanalysiscomparisonsofuppertroposphericlowerstratosphericjetsandmultipletropopauses
AT alambert reanalysiscomparisonsofuppertroposphericlowerstratosphericjetsandmultipletropopauses
AT spawson reanalysiscomparisonsofuppertroposphericlowerstratosphericjetsandmultipletropopauses
AT bwknosp reanalysiscomparisonsofuppertroposphericlowerstratosphericjetsandmultipletropopauses
AT rafuller reanalysiscomparisonsofuppertroposphericlowerstratosphericjetsandmultipletropopauses
AT whdaffer reanalysiscomparisonsofuppertroposphericlowerstratosphericjetsandmultipletropopauses