Monitoring the mind: the neurocognitive correlates of metamemory.

Memory performance in everyday life is often far from perfect and therefore needs to be monitored and controlled by metamemory evaluations, such as judgments of learning (JOLs). JOLs support monitoring for goal-directed modification of learning. Behavioral studies suggested retrieval processes as pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne T A Do Lam, Nikolai Axmacher, Juergen Fell, Bernhard P Staresina, Siegfried Gauggel, Tobias Wagner, Jan Olligs, Susanne Weis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3252366?pdf=render
_version_ 1818947939728359424
author Anne T A Do Lam
Nikolai Axmacher
Juergen Fell
Bernhard P Staresina
Siegfried Gauggel
Tobias Wagner
Jan Olligs
Susanne Weis
author_facet Anne T A Do Lam
Nikolai Axmacher
Juergen Fell
Bernhard P Staresina
Siegfried Gauggel
Tobias Wagner
Jan Olligs
Susanne Weis
author_sort Anne T A Do Lam
collection DOAJ
description Memory performance in everyday life is often far from perfect and therefore needs to be monitored and controlled by metamemory evaluations, such as judgments of learning (JOLs). JOLs support monitoring for goal-directed modification of learning. Behavioral studies suggested retrieval processes as providing a basis for JOLs. Previous functional imaging research on JOLs found a dissociation between processes underlying memory prediction, located in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), and actual encoding success, located in the medial temporal lobe. However, JOL-specific neural correlates could not be identified unequivocally, since JOLs were given simultaneously with encoding. Here, we aimed to identify the neurocognitive basis of JOLs, i.e., the cognitive processes and neural correlates of JOL, separate from initial encoding. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we implemented a face-name paired associative design. In general, we found that actual memory success was associated with increased brain activation of the hippocampi bilaterally, whereas predicted memory success was accompanied by increased activation in mPFC, orbital frontal and anterior cingulate cortices. Masking brain activation during predicted memory success with activation during retrieval success revealed BOLD increases of the mPFC. Our findings indicate that JOLs actually incorporate retrieval processes.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T08:38:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-837d2701f95b4c5a971fde5f20ae7b0a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T08:38:52Z
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-837d2701f95b4c5a971fde5f20ae7b0a2022-12-21T19:46:27ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0171e3000910.1371/journal.pone.0030009Monitoring the mind: the neurocognitive correlates of metamemory.Anne T A Do LamNikolai AxmacherJuergen FellBernhard P StaresinaSiegfried GauggelTobias WagnerJan OlligsSusanne WeisMemory performance in everyday life is often far from perfect and therefore needs to be monitored and controlled by metamemory evaluations, such as judgments of learning (JOLs). JOLs support monitoring for goal-directed modification of learning. Behavioral studies suggested retrieval processes as providing a basis for JOLs. Previous functional imaging research on JOLs found a dissociation between processes underlying memory prediction, located in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), and actual encoding success, located in the medial temporal lobe. However, JOL-specific neural correlates could not be identified unequivocally, since JOLs were given simultaneously with encoding. Here, we aimed to identify the neurocognitive basis of JOLs, i.e., the cognitive processes and neural correlates of JOL, separate from initial encoding. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we implemented a face-name paired associative design. In general, we found that actual memory success was associated with increased brain activation of the hippocampi bilaterally, whereas predicted memory success was accompanied by increased activation in mPFC, orbital frontal and anterior cingulate cortices. Masking brain activation during predicted memory success with activation during retrieval success revealed BOLD increases of the mPFC. Our findings indicate that JOLs actually incorporate retrieval processes.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3252366?pdf=render
spellingShingle Anne T A Do Lam
Nikolai Axmacher
Juergen Fell
Bernhard P Staresina
Siegfried Gauggel
Tobias Wagner
Jan Olligs
Susanne Weis
Monitoring the mind: the neurocognitive correlates of metamemory.
PLoS ONE
title Monitoring the mind: the neurocognitive correlates of metamemory.
title_full Monitoring the mind: the neurocognitive correlates of metamemory.
title_fullStr Monitoring the mind: the neurocognitive correlates of metamemory.
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring the mind: the neurocognitive correlates of metamemory.
title_short Monitoring the mind: the neurocognitive correlates of metamemory.
title_sort monitoring the mind the neurocognitive correlates of metamemory
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3252366?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT annetadolam monitoringthemindtheneurocognitivecorrelatesofmetamemory
AT nikolaiaxmacher monitoringthemindtheneurocognitivecorrelatesofmetamemory
AT juergenfell monitoringthemindtheneurocognitivecorrelatesofmetamemory
AT bernhardpstaresina monitoringthemindtheneurocognitivecorrelatesofmetamemory
AT siegfriedgauggel monitoringthemindtheneurocognitivecorrelatesofmetamemory
AT tobiaswagner monitoringthemindtheneurocognitivecorrelatesofmetamemory
AT janolligs monitoringthemindtheneurocognitivecorrelatesofmetamemory
AT susanneweis monitoringthemindtheneurocognitivecorrelatesofmetamemory