Impact of Molecular Diagnostics for Tuberculosis on Patient-Important Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Study Methodologies.

BACKGROUND:Several reviews on the accuracy of Tuberculosis (TB) Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) have been performed but the evidence on their impact on patient-important outcomes has not been systematically reviewed. Given the recent increase in research evaluating such outcomes and the gro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samuel G Schumacher, Hojoon Sohn, Zhi Zhen Qin, Genevieve Gore, J Lucian Davis, Claudia M Denkinger, Madhukar Pai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4783056?pdf=render
_version_ 1818144932045520896
author Samuel G Schumacher
Hojoon Sohn
Zhi Zhen Qin
Genevieve Gore
J Lucian Davis
Claudia M Denkinger
Madhukar Pai
author_facet Samuel G Schumacher
Hojoon Sohn
Zhi Zhen Qin
Genevieve Gore
J Lucian Davis
Claudia M Denkinger
Madhukar Pai
author_sort Samuel G Schumacher
collection DOAJ
description BACKGROUND:Several reviews on the accuracy of Tuberculosis (TB) Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) have been performed but the evidence on their impact on patient-important outcomes has not been systematically reviewed. Given the recent increase in research evaluating such outcomes and the growing list of TB NAATs that will reach the market over the coming years, there is a need to bring together the existing evidence on impact, rather than accuracy. We aimed to assess the approaches that have been employed to measure the impact of TB NAATs on patient-important outcomes in adults with possible pulmonary TB and/or drug-resistant TB. METHODS:We first develop a conceptual framework to clarify through which mechanisms the improved technical performance of a novel TB test may lead to improved patient outcomes and outline which designs may be used to measure them. We then systematically review the literature on studies attempting to assess the impact of molecular TB diagnostics on such outcomes and provide a narrative synthesis of designs used, outcomes assessed and risk of bias across different study designs. RESULTS:We found 25 eligible studies that assessed a wide range of outcomes and utilized a variety of experimental and observational study designs. Many potentially strong design options have never been used. We found that much of the available evidence on patient-important outcomes comes from a small number of settings with particular epidemiological and operational context and that confounding, time trends and incomplete outcome data receive insufficient attention. CONCLUSIONS:A broader range of designs should be considered when designing studies to assess the impact of TB diagnostics on patient outcomes and more attention needs to be paid to the analysis as concerns about confounding and selection bias become relevant in addition to those on measurement that are of greatest concern in accuracy studies.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T11:55:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-83a568425130433080a3b461e555af24
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T11:55:25Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-83a568425130433080a3b461e555af242022-12-22T01:08:14ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01113e015107310.1371/journal.pone.0151073Impact of Molecular Diagnostics for Tuberculosis on Patient-Important Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Study Methodologies.Samuel G SchumacherHojoon SohnZhi Zhen QinGenevieve GoreJ Lucian DavisClaudia M DenkingerMadhukar PaiBACKGROUND:Several reviews on the accuracy of Tuberculosis (TB) Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) have been performed but the evidence on their impact on patient-important outcomes has not been systematically reviewed. Given the recent increase in research evaluating such outcomes and the growing list of TB NAATs that will reach the market over the coming years, there is a need to bring together the existing evidence on impact, rather than accuracy. We aimed to assess the approaches that have been employed to measure the impact of TB NAATs on patient-important outcomes in adults with possible pulmonary TB and/or drug-resistant TB. METHODS:We first develop a conceptual framework to clarify through which mechanisms the improved technical performance of a novel TB test may lead to improved patient outcomes and outline which designs may be used to measure them. We then systematically review the literature on studies attempting to assess the impact of molecular TB diagnostics on such outcomes and provide a narrative synthesis of designs used, outcomes assessed and risk of bias across different study designs. RESULTS:We found 25 eligible studies that assessed a wide range of outcomes and utilized a variety of experimental and observational study designs. Many potentially strong design options have never been used. We found that much of the available evidence on patient-important outcomes comes from a small number of settings with particular epidemiological and operational context and that confounding, time trends and incomplete outcome data receive insufficient attention. CONCLUSIONS:A broader range of designs should be considered when designing studies to assess the impact of TB diagnostics on patient outcomes and more attention needs to be paid to the analysis as concerns about confounding and selection bias become relevant in addition to those on measurement that are of greatest concern in accuracy studies.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4783056?pdf=render
spellingShingle Samuel G Schumacher
Hojoon Sohn
Zhi Zhen Qin
Genevieve Gore
J Lucian Davis
Claudia M Denkinger
Madhukar Pai
Impact of Molecular Diagnostics for Tuberculosis on Patient-Important Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Study Methodologies.
PLoS ONE
title Impact of Molecular Diagnostics for Tuberculosis on Patient-Important Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Study Methodologies.
title_full Impact of Molecular Diagnostics for Tuberculosis on Patient-Important Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Study Methodologies.
title_fullStr Impact of Molecular Diagnostics for Tuberculosis on Patient-Important Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Study Methodologies.
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Molecular Diagnostics for Tuberculosis on Patient-Important Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Study Methodologies.
title_short Impact of Molecular Diagnostics for Tuberculosis on Patient-Important Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Study Methodologies.
title_sort impact of molecular diagnostics for tuberculosis on patient important outcomes a systematic review of study methodologies
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4783056?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT samuelgschumacher impactofmoleculardiagnosticsfortuberculosisonpatientimportantoutcomesasystematicreviewofstudymethodologies
AT hojoonsohn impactofmoleculardiagnosticsfortuberculosisonpatientimportantoutcomesasystematicreviewofstudymethodologies
AT zhizhenqin impactofmoleculardiagnosticsfortuberculosisonpatientimportantoutcomesasystematicreviewofstudymethodologies
AT genevievegore impactofmoleculardiagnosticsfortuberculosisonpatientimportantoutcomesasystematicreviewofstudymethodologies
AT jluciandavis impactofmoleculardiagnosticsfortuberculosisonpatientimportantoutcomesasystematicreviewofstudymethodologies
AT claudiamdenkinger impactofmoleculardiagnosticsfortuberculosisonpatientimportantoutcomesasystematicreviewofstudymethodologies
AT madhukarpai impactofmoleculardiagnosticsfortuberculosisonpatientimportantoutcomesasystematicreviewofstudymethodologies