Analysis of Solidarity Effect for Entropy, Pareto, and Gini Indices on Two-Class Society Using Kinetic Wealth Exchange Model

It is well known that two different underlying dynamics lead to different patterns of income/wealth distribution such as the Boltzmann–Gibbs form for the lower end and the Pareto-like power-law form for the higher-end. The Boltzmann–Gibbs distribution is naturally derived from maximizing the entropy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gyuchang Lim, Seungsik Min
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-03-01
Series:Entropy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/22/4/386
_version_ 1797626478472462336
author Gyuchang Lim
Seungsik Min
author_facet Gyuchang Lim
Seungsik Min
author_sort Gyuchang Lim
collection DOAJ
description It is well known that two different underlying dynamics lead to different patterns of income/wealth distribution such as the Boltzmann–Gibbs form for the lower end and the Pareto-like power-law form for the higher-end. The Boltzmann–Gibbs distribution is naturally derived from maximizing the entropy of random interactions among agents, whereas the Pareto distribution requires a rational approach of economics dependent on the wealth level. More interestingly, the Pareto regime is very dynamic, whereas the Boltzmann–Gibbs regime is stable over time. Also, there are some cases in which the distributions of income/wealth are bimodal or polymodal. In order to incorporate the dynamic aspects of the Pareto regime and the polymodal forms of income/wealth distribution into one stochastic model, we present a modified agent-based model based on classical kinetic wealth exchange models. First, we adopt a simple two-class society consisting of the rich and the poor where the agents in the same class engage in random exchanges while the agents in the different classes perform a wealth-dependent winner-takes-all trading. This modification leads the system to an extreme polarized society with preserving the Pareto exponent. Second, we incorporate a solidarity formation among agents belonging to the lower class in our model, in order to confront a super-rich agent. This modification leads the system to a drastic bimodal distribution of wealth with a varying Pareto exponent over varying the solidarity parameter, that is, the Pareto-regime becomes narrower and the Pareto exponent gets larger as the solidarity parameter increases. We argue that the solidarity formation is the key ingredient in the varying Pareto exponent and the polymodal distribution. Lastly, we take two approaches to evaluate the level of inequality of wealth such as Gini coefficients and the entropy measure. According to the numerical results, the increasing solidarity parameter leads to a decreasing Gini coefficient not linearly but nonlinearly, whereas the entropy measure is robust over varying solidarity parameters, implying that there is a trade-off between the intermediate party and the high end.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T10:10:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-83a75a0ea8e149a7bcd0dae17437e3cf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1099-4300
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T10:10:58Z
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Entropy
spelling doaj.art-83a75a0ea8e149a7bcd0dae17437e3cf2023-11-16T14:31:47ZengMDPI AGEntropy1099-43002020-03-0122438610.3390/e22040386Analysis of Solidarity Effect for Entropy, Pareto, and Gini Indices on Two-Class Society Using Kinetic Wealth Exchange ModelGyuchang Lim0Seungsik Min1Department of Natural Science, Korea Naval Academy, Changwon 51704, KoreaDepartment of Natural Science, Korea Naval Academy, Changwon 51704, KoreaIt is well known that two different underlying dynamics lead to different patterns of income/wealth distribution such as the Boltzmann–Gibbs form for the lower end and the Pareto-like power-law form for the higher-end. The Boltzmann–Gibbs distribution is naturally derived from maximizing the entropy of random interactions among agents, whereas the Pareto distribution requires a rational approach of economics dependent on the wealth level. More interestingly, the Pareto regime is very dynamic, whereas the Boltzmann–Gibbs regime is stable over time. Also, there are some cases in which the distributions of income/wealth are bimodal or polymodal. In order to incorporate the dynamic aspects of the Pareto regime and the polymodal forms of income/wealth distribution into one stochastic model, we present a modified agent-based model based on classical kinetic wealth exchange models. First, we adopt a simple two-class society consisting of the rich and the poor where the agents in the same class engage in random exchanges while the agents in the different classes perform a wealth-dependent winner-takes-all trading. This modification leads the system to an extreme polarized society with preserving the Pareto exponent. Second, we incorporate a solidarity formation among agents belonging to the lower class in our model, in order to confront a super-rich agent. This modification leads the system to a drastic bimodal distribution of wealth with a varying Pareto exponent over varying the solidarity parameter, that is, the Pareto-regime becomes narrower and the Pareto exponent gets larger as the solidarity parameter increases. We argue that the solidarity formation is the key ingredient in the varying Pareto exponent and the polymodal distribution. Lastly, we take two approaches to evaluate the level of inequality of wealth such as Gini coefficients and the entropy measure. According to the numerical results, the increasing solidarity parameter leads to a decreasing Gini coefficient not linearly but nonlinearly, whereas the entropy measure is robust over varying solidarity parameters, implying that there is a trade-off between the intermediate party and the high end.https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/22/4/386kinetic wealth exchange modelstratified societysolidarityPareto exponentGini coefficiententropy
spellingShingle Gyuchang Lim
Seungsik Min
Analysis of Solidarity Effect for Entropy, Pareto, and Gini Indices on Two-Class Society Using Kinetic Wealth Exchange Model
Entropy
kinetic wealth exchange model
stratified society
solidarity
Pareto exponent
Gini coefficient
entropy
title Analysis of Solidarity Effect for Entropy, Pareto, and Gini Indices on Two-Class Society Using Kinetic Wealth Exchange Model
title_full Analysis of Solidarity Effect for Entropy, Pareto, and Gini Indices on Two-Class Society Using Kinetic Wealth Exchange Model
title_fullStr Analysis of Solidarity Effect for Entropy, Pareto, and Gini Indices on Two-Class Society Using Kinetic Wealth Exchange Model
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Solidarity Effect for Entropy, Pareto, and Gini Indices on Two-Class Society Using Kinetic Wealth Exchange Model
title_short Analysis of Solidarity Effect for Entropy, Pareto, and Gini Indices on Two-Class Society Using Kinetic Wealth Exchange Model
title_sort analysis of solidarity effect for entropy pareto and gini indices on two class society using kinetic wealth exchange model
topic kinetic wealth exchange model
stratified society
solidarity
Pareto exponent
Gini coefficient
entropy
url https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/22/4/386
work_keys_str_mv AT gyuchanglim analysisofsolidarityeffectforentropyparetoandginiindicesontwoclasssocietyusingkineticwealthexchangemodel
AT seungsikmin analysisofsolidarityeffectforentropyparetoandginiindicesontwoclasssocietyusingkineticwealthexchangemodel