Conometric Connection for Implant-Supported Crowns: A Prospective Clinical Cohort Study

Background: Traditional screw or cemented connections in dental implants present limitations, prompting the exploration of alternative methods. This study assesses the clinical outcomes of single crowns and fixed partial prostheses supported by conometric connections after one year of follow-up. Met...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saturnino Marco Lupi, Dario De Martis, Claudia Todaro, Gaetano Isola, Mario Beretta, Ruggero Rodriguez y Baena
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-12-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/24/7647
_version_ 1797380554710056960
author Saturnino Marco Lupi
Dario De Martis
Claudia Todaro
Gaetano Isola
Mario Beretta
Ruggero Rodriguez y Baena
author_facet Saturnino Marco Lupi
Dario De Martis
Claudia Todaro
Gaetano Isola
Mario Beretta
Ruggero Rodriguez y Baena
author_sort Saturnino Marco Lupi
collection DOAJ
description Background: Traditional screw or cemented connections in dental implants present limitations, prompting the exploration of alternative methods. This study assesses the clinical outcomes of single crowns and fixed partial prostheses supported by conometric connections after one year of follow-up. Methods: Twenty-two patients received 70 implants, supporting 33 rehabilitations. Biological responses and prosthodontic complications were evaluated at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Results: All implants exhibited successful osseointegration, with no losses or peri-implant inflammation. Marginal bone levels showed minimal changes, well below pathological thresholds. The difference in marginal bone loss (MBL) was −0.27 ± 0.79 mm between T0 and T1, and −0.51 ± 0.93 mm between T0 and T2. No abutment screw loosening or crown chipping occurred. However, coupling stability loss was observed in nine cases. Conclusions: The conometric connection demonstrated successful integration and minimal complications after one year. This alternative shows promise, particularly in simplifying handling and improving marginal adaptation. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up is warranted for comprehensive validation.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T20:38:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-83b9ba2c82a344859c85c69428ba1ba3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T20:38:58Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-83b9ba2c82a344859c85c69428ba1ba32023-12-22T14:17:19ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832023-12-011224764710.3390/jcm12247647Conometric Connection for Implant-Supported Crowns: A Prospective Clinical Cohort StudySaturnino Marco Lupi0Dario De Martis1Claudia Todaro2Gaetano Isola3Mario Beretta4Ruggero Rodriguez y Baena5Department of Clinical Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, ItalyDepartment of Clinical Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, ItalyDepartment of Clinical Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, ItalyDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, ItalyDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, ItalyDepartment of Clinical Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, ItalyBackground: Traditional screw or cemented connections in dental implants present limitations, prompting the exploration of alternative methods. This study assesses the clinical outcomes of single crowns and fixed partial prostheses supported by conometric connections after one year of follow-up. Methods: Twenty-two patients received 70 implants, supporting 33 rehabilitations. Biological responses and prosthodontic complications were evaluated at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Results: All implants exhibited successful osseointegration, with no losses or peri-implant inflammation. Marginal bone levels showed minimal changes, well below pathological thresholds. The difference in marginal bone loss (MBL) was −0.27 ± 0.79 mm between T0 and T1, and −0.51 ± 0.93 mm between T0 and T2. No abutment screw loosening or crown chipping occurred. However, coupling stability loss was observed in nine cases. Conclusions: The conometric connection demonstrated successful integration and minimal complications after one year. This alternative shows promise, particularly in simplifying handling and improving marginal adaptation. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up is warranted for comprehensive validation.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/24/7647conometric connectiondental implantsfixed dental prosthesisclinical outcome
spellingShingle Saturnino Marco Lupi
Dario De Martis
Claudia Todaro
Gaetano Isola
Mario Beretta
Ruggero Rodriguez y Baena
Conometric Connection for Implant-Supported Crowns: A Prospective Clinical Cohort Study
Journal of Clinical Medicine
conometric connection
dental implants
fixed dental prosthesis
clinical outcome
title Conometric Connection for Implant-Supported Crowns: A Prospective Clinical Cohort Study
title_full Conometric Connection for Implant-Supported Crowns: A Prospective Clinical Cohort Study
title_fullStr Conometric Connection for Implant-Supported Crowns: A Prospective Clinical Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Conometric Connection for Implant-Supported Crowns: A Prospective Clinical Cohort Study
title_short Conometric Connection for Implant-Supported Crowns: A Prospective Clinical Cohort Study
title_sort conometric connection for implant supported crowns a prospective clinical cohort study
topic conometric connection
dental implants
fixed dental prosthesis
clinical outcome
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/24/7647
work_keys_str_mv AT saturninomarcolupi conometricconnectionforimplantsupportedcrownsaprospectiveclinicalcohortstudy
AT dariodemartis conometricconnectionforimplantsupportedcrownsaprospectiveclinicalcohortstudy
AT claudiatodaro conometricconnectionforimplantsupportedcrownsaprospectiveclinicalcohortstudy
AT gaetanoisola conometricconnectionforimplantsupportedcrownsaprospectiveclinicalcohortstudy
AT marioberetta conometricconnectionforimplantsupportedcrownsaprospectiveclinicalcohortstudy
AT ruggerorodriguezybaena conometricconnectionforimplantsupportedcrownsaprospectiveclinicalcohortstudy